关于成对比较方法中不一致指数特性的公理化结构概述与比较

Sangeeta Pant, Anuj Kumar, Jiří Mazurek
{"title":"关于成对比较方法中不一致指数特性的公理化结构概述与比较","authors":"Sangeeta Pant, Anuj Kumar, Jiří Mazurek","doi":"arxiv-2408.13297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematical analysis of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) led to the\ndevelopment of a mathematical function, usually called the inconsistency index,\nwhich has the center role in measuring the inconsistency of the judgements in\nAHP. Inconsistency index is a mathematical function which maps every pairwise\ncomparison matrix (PCM) into a real number. An inconsistency index can be\nconsidered more trustworthy when it satisfies a set of suitable properties.\nTherefore, the research community has been trying to postulate a set of\ndesirable rules (axioms, properties) for inconsistency indices. Subsequently,\nmany axiomatic frameworks for these functions have been suggested\nindependently, however, the literature on the topic is fragmented and missing a\nbroader framework. Therefore, the objective of this article is twofold.\nFirstly, we provide a comprehensive review of the advancements in the\naxiomatization of inconsistency indices' properties during the last decade.\nSecondly, we provide a comparison and discussion of the aforementioned\naxiomatic structures along with directions of the future research.","PeriodicalId":501208,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Overview and Comparison of Axiomatization Structures Regarding Inconsistency Indices' Properties in Pairwise Comparisons Methods\",\"authors\":\"Sangeeta Pant, Anuj Kumar, Jiří Mazurek\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.13297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mathematical analysis of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) led to the\\ndevelopment of a mathematical function, usually called the inconsistency index,\\nwhich has the center role in measuring the inconsistency of the judgements in\\nAHP. Inconsistency index is a mathematical function which maps every pairwise\\ncomparison matrix (PCM) into a real number. An inconsistency index can be\\nconsidered more trustworthy when it satisfies a set of suitable properties.\\nTherefore, the research community has been trying to postulate a set of\\ndesirable rules (axioms, properties) for inconsistency indices. Subsequently,\\nmany axiomatic frameworks for these functions have been suggested\\nindependently, however, the literature on the topic is fragmented and missing a\\nbroader framework. Therefore, the objective of this article is twofold.\\nFirstly, we provide a comprehensive review of the advancements in the\\naxiomatization of inconsistency indices' properties during the last decade.\\nSecondly, we provide a comparison and discussion of the aforementioned\\naxiomatic structures along with directions of the future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对层次分析法(AHP)进行数学分析,人们开发出了一种数学函数,通常称为不一致指数,它在衡量 AHP 中判断的不一致性方面起着核心作用。不一致指数是一个数学函数,它将每个成对比较矩阵(PCM)映射成一个实数。因此,研究界一直试图为不一致指数提出一套理想的规则(公理、属性)。因此,研究界一直在试图为不一致指数提出一套理想的规则(公理、属性)。随后,人们又为这些函数提出了许多独立的公理框架,然而,关于这一主题的文献支离破碎,缺少国外的框架。因此,本文的目的有二:第一,全面回顾过去十年中不一致指数性质公理化的进展;第二,对上述公理化结构进行比较和讨论,并提出未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Overview and Comparison of Axiomatization Structures Regarding Inconsistency Indices' Properties in Pairwise Comparisons Methods
Mathematical analysis of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) led to the development of a mathematical function, usually called the inconsistency index, which has the center role in measuring the inconsistency of the judgements in AHP. Inconsistency index is a mathematical function which maps every pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) into a real number. An inconsistency index can be considered more trustworthy when it satisfies a set of suitable properties. Therefore, the research community has been trying to postulate a set of desirable rules (axioms, properties) for inconsistency indices. Subsequently, many axiomatic frameworks for these functions have been suggested independently, however, the literature on the topic is fragmented and missing a broader framework. Therefore, the objective of this article is twofold. Firstly, we provide a comprehensive review of the advancements in the axiomatization of inconsistency indices' properties during the last decade. Secondly, we provide a comparison and discussion of the aforementioned axiomatic structures along with directions of the future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信