具有二义性检验的单计数器自动机的不变式

Dmitry Chistikov, Jérôme Leroux, Henry Sinclair-Banks, Nicolas Waldburger
{"title":"具有二义性检验的单计数器自动机的不变式","authors":"Dmitry Chistikov, Jérôme Leroux, Henry Sinclair-Banks, Nicolas Waldburger","doi":"arxiv-2408.11908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the reachability problem for one-counter automata in which\ntransitions can carry disequality tests. A disequality test is a guard that\nprohibits a specified counter value. This reachability problem has been known\nto be NP-hard and in PSPACE, and characterising its computational complexity\nhas been left as a challenging open question by Almagor, Cohen, P\\'erez,\nShirmohammadi, and Worrell (2020). We reduce the complexity gap, placing the\nproblem into the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, namely into the\nclass $\\mathsf{coNP}^{\\mathsf{NP}}$. In the presence of both equality and\ndisequality tests, our upper bound is at the third level,\n$\\mathsf{P}^{\\mathsf{NP}^{\\mathsf{NP}}}$. To prove this result, we show that non-reachability can be witnessed by a\npair of invariants (forward and backward). These invariants are almost\ninductive. They aim to over-approximate only a \"core\" of the reachability set\ninstead of the entire set. The invariants are also leaky: it is possible to\nescape the set. We complement this with separate checks as the leaks can only\noccur in a controlled way.","PeriodicalId":501208,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invariants for One-Counter Automata with Disequality Tests\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry Chistikov, Jérôme Leroux, Henry Sinclair-Banks, Nicolas Waldburger\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.11908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the reachability problem for one-counter automata in which\\ntransitions can carry disequality tests. A disequality test is a guard that\\nprohibits a specified counter value. This reachability problem has been known\\nto be NP-hard and in PSPACE, and characterising its computational complexity\\nhas been left as a challenging open question by Almagor, Cohen, P\\\\'erez,\\nShirmohammadi, and Worrell (2020). We reduce the complexity gap, placing the\\nproblem into the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, namely into the\\nclass $\\\\mathsf{coNP}^{\\\\mathsf{NP}}$. In the presence of both equality and\\ndisequality tests, our upper bound is at the third level,\\n$\\\\mathsf{P}^{\\\\mathsf{NP}^{\\\\mathsf{NP}}}$. To prove this result, we show that non-reachability can be witnessed by a\\npair of invariants (forward and backward). These invariants are almost\\ninductive. They aim to over-approximate only a \\\"core\\\" of the reachability set\\ninstead of the entire set. The invariants are also leaky: it is possible to\\nescape the set. We complement this with separate checks as the leaks can only\\noccur in a controlled way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了单计数器自动机的可达性问题,在这种自动机中,转场可以携带不等式检验。不等式检验是一个禁止指定计数器值的防护装置。这个可达性问题已知是 NP-hard(NP-hard)的,而且在 PSPACE 中,Almagor、Cohen、P\'erez、Shirmohammadi 和 Worrell(2020 年)将其计算复杂性的特征描述作为一个具有挑战性的开放问题。我们缩小了复杂度的差距,把这个问题放到了多项式层次结构的第二级,即$\mathsf{coNP}^{mathsf{NP}}$类。在同时存在相等和不相等检验的情况下,我们的上限是第三级,即 $/mathsf{P}^{mathsf{NP}^{mathsf{NP}}$。为了证明这个结果,我们证明了不可达性可以通过一对不变式(前向和后向)来证明。这些不变式几乎是推导式的。它们的目的只是过度逼近可达性集合的一个 "核心",而不是整个集合。这些不变式也是有漏洞的:有可能超越集合。由于泄漏只能以受控的方式发生,我们对此进行了单独检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invariants for One-Counter Automata with Disequality Tests
We study the reachability problem for one-counter automata in which transitions can carry disequality tests. A disequality test is a guard that prohibits a specified counter value. This reachability problem has been known to be NP-hard and in PSPACE, and characterising its computational complexity has been left as a challenging open question by Almagor, Cohen, P\'erez, Shirmohammadi, and Worrell (2020). We reduce the complexity gap, placing the problem into the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, namely into the class $\mathsf{coNP}^{\mathsf{NP}}$. In the presence of both equality and disequality tests, our upper bound is at the third level, $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{NP}^{\mathsf{NP}}}$. To prove this result, we show that non-reachability can be witnessed by a pair of invariants (forward and backward). These invariants are almost inductive. They aim to over-approximate only a "core" of the reachability set instead of the entire set. The invariants are also leaky: it is possible to escape the set. We complement this with separate checks as the leaks can only occur in a controlled way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信