探索动手化学实验室和虚拟化学实验室在学生学习和探究技能方面的差异

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shuangshuang Chen, Song Xue, Dan Yang, Liying Zhu, Mingzhan Ye
{"title":"探索动手化学实验室和虚拟化学实验室在学生学习和探究技能方面的差异","authors":"Shuangshuang Chen, Song Xue, Dan Yang, Liying Zhu, Mingzhan Ye","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories\",\"authors\":\"Shuangshuang Chen, Song Xue, Dan Yang, Liying Zhu, Mingzhan Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在数字时代,人们越来越提倡将技术融入教育实践,尤其是化学教育。然而,探索虚拟实验室(VL)环境与动手实验室(HL)环境的相对有效性,特别是在提高学生的知识和探究技能方面的有效性的研究却很少见。本研究针对这一空白,在质量守恒定律的特定背景下,评估了虚拟实验室和实践实验室对初中学生学习的影响。通过对学生在知识测试和探究任务中的表现进行定量和定性评估分析,得出了重要发现。结果表明,与高年级组相比,低年级组在知识方面的表现更胜一筹。在探究技能方面,虽然高年级组的整体表现更好,特别是在计划和证据收集方面,但自愿学习组在解释和评价技能方面表现出色。这些结果表明,在化学教育的各个领域实施混合式教学法,将虚拟语言和普通语言结合起来,可能会带来益处。这种方法可以利用每种实验室类型的独特优势,最大限度地提高学生的学习和参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories

Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories
In the digital age, the integration of technology in educational practices, especially in chemistry, is increasingly advocated. However, research exploring the relative effectiveness of virtual laboratory (VL) environments compared to hands-on laboratory (HL) environments, particularly in enhancing students’ knowledge and inquiry skills, is rare. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of VL and HL on junior high school students’ learning within the specific context of the Law of Conservation of Mass. By analyzing students’ performance through quantitative and qualitative assessments in knowledge tests and inquiry tasks, significant findings emerged. It was observed that the VL group demonstrated superior knowledge performance compared with the HL group. In terms of inquiry skills, while the overall performance was better in the HL group, particularly in planning and evidence collection, the VL group excelled in explanation and evaluation skills. These results suggest the potential benefit of implementing a blended approach, integrating both VL and HL, across various domains in chemistry education. Such an approach could leverage the unique advantages of each laboratory type to maximize student learning and engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信