分散借贷合同的定价和套期保值

Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabaté Vidales, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang
{"title":"分散借贷合同的定价和套期保值","authors":"Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabaté Vidales, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2409.04233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the loan contracts offered by decentralised loan protocols (DLPs)\nthrough the lens of financial derivatives. DLPs, which effectively are\nclearinghouses, facilitate transactions between option buyers (i.e. borrowers)\nand option sellers (i.e. lenders). The loan-to-value at which the contract is\ninitiated determines the option premium borrowers pay for entering the\ncontract, and this can be deduced from the non-arbitrage pricing theory. We\nshow that when there are no market frictions, and there is no spread between\nlending and borrowing rates, it is optimal to never enter the lending contract. Next, by accounting for the spread between rates and transactional costs, we\ndevelop a deep neural network-based algorithm for learning trading strategies\non the external markets that allow us to replicate the payoff of the lending\ncontracts that are not necessarily optimally exercised. This allows hedge the\nrisk lenders carry by issuing options sold to the borrowers, which can\ncomplement (or even replace) the liquidations mechanism used to protect\nlenders' capital. Our approach can also be used to exploit (statistical)\narbitrage opportunities that may arise when DLP allow users to enter lending\ncontracts with loan-to-value, which is not appropriately calibrated to market\nconditions or/and when different markets price risk differently. We present\nthorough simulation experiments using historical data and simulations to\nvalidate our approach.","PeriodicalId":501128,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing and hedging of decentralised lending contracts\",\"authors\":\"Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabaté Vidales, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the loan contracts offered by decentralised loan protocols (DLPs)\\nthrough the lens of financial derivatives. DLPs, which effectively are\\nclearinghouses, facilitate transactions between option buyers (i.e. borrowers)\\nand option sellers (i.e. lenders). The loan-to-value at which the contract is\\ninitiated determines the option premium borrowers pay for entering the\\ncontract, and this can be deduced from the non-arbitrage pricing theory. We\\nshow that when there are no market frictions, and there is no spread between\\nlending and borrowing rates, it is optimal to never enter the lending contract. Next, by accounting for the spread between rates and transactional costs, we\\ndevelop a deep neural network-based algorithm for learning trading strategies\\non the external markets that allow us to replicate the payoff of the lending\\ncontracts that are not necessarily optimally exercised. This allows hedge the\\nrisk lenders carry by issuing options sold to the borrowers, which can\\ncomplement (or even replace) the liquidations mechanism used to protect\\nlenders' capital. Our approach can also be used to exploit (statistical)\\narbitrage opportunities that may arise when DLP allow users to enter lending\\ncontracts with loan-to-value, which is not appropriately calibrated to market\\nconditions or/and when different markets price risk differently. We present\\nthorough simulation experiments using historical data and simulations to\\nvalidate our approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们从金融衍生品的角度研究分散贷款协议(DLPs)提供的贷款合同。DLP 实际上就是清算所,为期权买方(即借款人)和期权卖方(即贷款人)之间的交易提供便利。合约启动时的贷款价值决定了借款人签订合约时所支付的期权溢价,这可以从非套利定价理论中推导出来。我们可以看到,在没有市场摩擦、贷款利率与借款利率之间没有利差的情况下,永远不签订借贷合同是最优选择。接下来,通过考虑利率差和交易成本,我们开发了一种基于深度神经网络的算法,用于学习外部市场上的交易策略,使我们能够复制不一定以最优方式执行的借贷合约的回报。这样就可以通过向借款人出售期权来对冲贷款人的风险,从而补充(甚至替代)用于保护贷款人资本的清算机制。我们的方法还可用于利用(统计)套利机会,当 DLP 允许用户签订贷款与价值比率的借贷合同时,可能会出现(统计)套利机会。我们利用历史数据和模拟实验来验证我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pricing and hedging of decentralised lending contracts
We study the loan contracts offered by decentralised loan protocols (DLPs) through the lens of financial derivatives. DLPs, which effectively are clearinghouses, facilitate transactions between option buyers (i.e. borrowers) and option sellers (i.e. lenders). The loan-to-value at which the contract is initiated determines the option premium borrowers pay for entering the contract, and this can be deduced from the non-arbitrage pricing theory. We show that when there are no market frictions, and there is no spread between lending and borrowing rates, it is optimal to never enter the lending contract. Next, by accounting for the spread between rates and transactional costs, we develop a deep neural network-based algorithm for learning trading strategies on the external markets that allow us to replicate the payoff of the lending contracts that are not necessarily optimally exercised. This allows hedge the risk lenders carry by issuing options sold to the borrowers, which can complement (or even replace) the liquidations mechanism used to protect lenders' capital. Our approach can also be used to exploit (statistical) arbitrage opportunities that may arise when DLP allow users to enter lending contracts with loan-to-value, which is not appropriately calibrated to market conditions or/and when different markets price risk differently. We present thorough simulation experiments using historical data and simulations to validate our approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信