Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabaté Vidales, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang
{"title":"分散借贷合同的定价和套期保值","authors":"Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabaté Vidales, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2409.04233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the loan contracts offered by decentralised loan protocols (DLPs)\nthrough the lens of financial derivatives. DLPs, which effectively are\nclearinghouses, facilitate transactions between option buyers (i.e. borrowers)\nand option sellers (i.e. lenders). The loan-to-value at which the contract is\ninitiated determines the option premium borrowers pay for entering the\ncontract, and this can be deduced from the non-arbitrage pricing theory. We\nshow that when there are no market frictions, and there is no spread between\nlending and borrowing rates, it is optimal to never enter the lending contract. Next, by accounting for the spread between rates and transactional costs, we\ndevelop a deep neural network-based algorithm for learning trading strategies\non the external markets that allow us to replicate the payoff of the lending\ncontracts that are not necessarily optimally exercised. This allows hedge the\nrisk lenders carry by issuing options sold to the borrowers, which can\ncomplement (or even replace) the liquidations mechanism used to protect\nlenders' capital. Our approach can also be used to exploit (statistical)\narbitrage opportunities that may arise when DLP allow users to enter lending\ncontracts with loan-to-value, which is not appropriately calibrated to market\nconditions or/and when different markets price risk differently. We present\nthorough simulation experiments using historical data and simulations to\nvalidate our approach.","PeriodicalId":501128,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing and hedging of decentralised lending contracts\",\"authors\":\"Lukasz Szpruch, Marc Sabaté Vidales, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the loan contracts offered by decentralised loan protocols (DLPs)\\nthrough the lens of financial derivatives. DLPs, which effectively are\\nclearinghouses, facilitate transactions between option buyers (i.e. borrowers)\\nand option sellers (i.e. lenders). The loan-to-value at which the contract is\\ninitiated determines the option premium borrowers pay for entering the\\ncontract, and this can be deduced from the non-arbitrage pricing theory. We\\nshow that when there are no market frictions, and there is no spread between\\nlending and borrowing rates, it is optimal to never enter the lending contract. Next, by accounting for the spread between rates and transactional costs, we\\ndevelop a deep neural network-based algorithm for learning trading strategies\\non the external markets that allow us to replicate the payoff of the lending\\ncontracts that are not necessarily optimally exercised. This allows hedge the\\nrisk lenders carry by issuing options sold to the borrowers, which can\\ncomplement (or even replace) the liquidations mechanism used to protect\\nlenders' capital. Our approach can also be used to exploit (statistical)\\narbitrage opportunities that may arise when DLP allow users to enter lending\\ncontracts with loan-to-value, which is not appropriately calibrated to market\\nconditions or/and when different markets price risk differently. We present\\nthorough simulation experiments using historical data and simulations to\\nvalidate our approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pricing and hedging of decentralised lending contracts
We study the loan contracts offered by decentralised loan protocols (DLPs)
through the lens of financial derivatives. DLPs, which effectively are
clearinghouses, facilitate transactions between option buyers (i.e. borrowers)
and option sellers (i.e. lenders). The loan-to-value at which the contract is
initiated determines the option premium borrowers pay for entering the
contract, and this can be deduced from the non-arbitrage pricing theory. We
show that when there are no market frictions, and there is no spread between
lending and borrowing rates, it is optimal to never enter the lending contract. Next, by accounting for the spread between rates and transactional costs, we
develop a deep neural network-based algorithm for learning trading strategies
on the external markets that allow us to replicate the payoff of the lending
contracts that are not necessarily optimally exercised. This allows hedge the
risk lenders carry by issuing options sold to the borrowers, which can
complement (or even replace) the liquidations mechanism used to protect
lenders' capital. Our approach can also be used to exploit (statistical)
arbitrage opportunities that may arise when DLP allow users to enter lending
contracts with loan-to-value, which is not appropriately calibrated to market
conditions or/and when different markets price risk differently. We present
thorough simulation experiments using historical data and simulations to
validate our approach.