N. Prasad Rao, R. Balagopal, R. P. Rokade, G. S. Palani
{"title":"输电线路塔架的冗余诱导支撑故障","authors":"N. Prasad Rao, R. Balagopal, R. P. Rokade, G. S. Palani","doi":"10.1007/s13296-024-00897-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transmission line towers designed based on the provisions of different standards may fail during mandatory testing for many reasons. Two different types of premature failures observed during full-scale testing at Tower Testing and Research Station, Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai (CSIR-SERC), are studied in this paper. These towers failed prematurely due to improper design assumptions secondary to the primary bracing connection. The failures are modelled using general-purpose finite element software. The test and analytical results are compared with various codal provisions. Hip bracing connected to primary bracing with a single bolt acts as a hinge and fails to provide adequate restraint. The assumption that hip bracing provides restraint to the primary bracing against the in-plane deformation is invalid, and it can only prevent the primary member’s displacement along the hip’s axis due to its axial stiffness. This study recommends a double bolt connection for redundant members.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":596,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Steel Structures","volume":"24 5","pages":"1154 - 1164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redundant Induced Bracing Failures in Transmission Line Towers\",\"authors\":\"N. Prasad Rao, R. Balagopal, R. P. Rokade, G. S. Palani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13296-024-00897-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Transmission line towers designed based on the provisions of different standards may fail during mandatory testing for many reasons. Two different types of premature failures observed during full-scale testing at Tower Testing and Research Station, Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai (CSIR-SERC), are studied in this paper. These towers failed prematurely due to improper design assumptions secondary to the primary bracing connection. The failures are modelled using general-purpose finite element software. The test and analytical results are compared with various codal provisions. Hip bracing connected to primary bracing with a single bolt acts as a hinge and fails to provide adequate restraint. The assumption that hip bracing provides restraint to the primary bracing against the in-plane deformation is invalid, and it can only prevent the primary member’s displacement along the hip’s axis due to its axial stiffness. This study recommends a double bolt connection for redundant members.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Steel Structures\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"1154 - 1164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Steel Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13296-024-00897-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Steel Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13296-024-00897-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Redundant Induced Bracing Failures in Transmission Line Towers
Transmission line towers designed based on the provisions of different standards may fail during mandatory testing for many reasons. Two different types of premature failures observed during full-scale testing at Tower Testing and Research Station, Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai (CSIR-SERC), are studied in this paper. These towers failed prematurely due to improper design assumptions secondary to the primary bracing connection. The failures are modelled using general-purpose finite element software. The test and analytical results are compared with various codal provisions. Hip bracing connected to primary bracing with a single bolt acts as a hinge and fails to provide adequate restraint. The assumption that hip bracing provides restraint to the primary bracing against the in-plane deformation is invalid, and it can only prevent the primary member’s displacement along the hip’s axis due to its axial stiffness. This study recommends a double bolt connection for redundant members.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Steel Structures provides an international forum for a broad classification of technical papers in steel structural research and its applications. The journal aims to reach not only researchers, but also practicing engineers. Coverage encompasses such topics as stability, fatigue, non-linear behavior, dynamics, reliability, fire, design codes, computer-aided analysis and design, optimization, expert systems, connections, fabrications, maintenance, bridges, off-shore structures, jetties, stadiums, transmission towers, marine vessels, storage tanks, pressure vessels, aerospace, and pipelines and more.