Boon Chong Kwok, Helen Elizabeth Smith, Pui Wah Kong
{"title":"通过单腿深蹲和腘绳肌柔韧性确定有问题的一侧,治疗非特异性慢性腰痛","authors":"Boon Chong Kwok, Helen Elizabeth Smith, Pui Wah Kong","doi":"10.3390/medicina60091428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: In patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP), their pain and problem sides can differ. Clinical Pilates assessment provides an approach to identify the problem side, but this approach requires experience and can be subjective. This study aimed to investigate if objective measures of single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility could identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP. Materials and Methods: Forty adults with non-specific chronic LBP were tested on single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility. The problem side of participants was assessed with the Clinical Pilates method. Paired t-tests were used to compare the postural sway parameters of the single-leg squat and hamstrings flexibility between the problem and non-problem sides. Cohen’s kappa was then used to assess the agreement of postural sway and flexibility measures with the Clinical Pilates method. Results: The problem side showed smaller vertical force variance, larger sway path distances, lower peak vertical force, smaller terminal knee flexion angle, longer time to complete the five single-leg squats, and tighter hamstrings as compared to the non-problem side. However, only the overall and anteroposterior sway path distances, terminal knee flexion angle, total squat duration, and hamstrings flexibility yielded moderate to strong agreement with the Clinical Pilates method. Conclusions: Single-leg squat postural sway parameters and hamstrings flexibility can objectively identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP.","PeriodicalId":18512,"journal":{"name":"Medicina","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the Problem Side with Single-Leg Squat and Hamstrings Flexibility for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"Boon Chong Kwok, Helen Elizabeth Smith, Pui Wah Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina60091428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: In patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP), their pain and problem sides can differ. Clinical Pilates assessment provides an approach to identify the problem side, but this approach requires experience and can be subjective. This study aimed to investigate if objective measures of single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility could identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP. Materials and Methods: Forty adults with non-specific chronic LBP were tested on single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility. The problem side of participants was assessed with the Clinical Pilates method. Paired t-tests were used to compare the postural sway parameters of the single-leg squat and hamstrings flexibility between the problem and non-problem sides. Cohen’s kappa was then used to assess the agreement of postural sway and flexibility measures with the Clinical Pilates method. Results: The problem side showed smaller vertical force variance, larger sway path distances, lower peak vertical force, smaller terminal knee flexion angle, longer time to complete the five single-leg squats, and tighter hamstrings as compared to the non-problem side. However, only the overall and anteroposterior sway path distances, terminal knee flexion angle, total squat duration, and hamstrings flexibility yielded moderate to strong agreement with the Clinical Pilates method. Conclusions: Single-leg squat postural sway parameters and hamstrings flexibility can objectively identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:非特异性慢性腰背痛(LBP)患者的疼痛侧和问题侧可能有所不同。临床普拉提评估提供了一种识别问题侧的方法,但这种方法需要经验,而且可能很主观。本研究旨在探讨单腿深蹲姿势控制和腘绳肌灵活性的客观测量是否能识别非特异性慢性腰背痛成人的问题侧。材料和方法:对 40 名患有非特异性慢性腰痛的成人进行了单腿深蹲姿势控制和腘绳肌灵活性测试。采用临床普拉提方法对参与者的问题侧进行评估。采用配对 t 检验比较问题侧和非问题侧的单腿深蹲姿势摇摆参数和腘绳肌灵活性。然后使用 Cohen's kappa 评估姿势摇摆和柔韧性测量与临床普拉提方法的一致性。结果显示与没有问题的一侧相比,有问题的一侧显示出较小的垂直力方差、较大的摇摆路径距离、较低的垂直力峰值、较小的膝关节末端屈曲角、完成五个单腿深蹲的时间较长以及较紧的腘绳肌。然而,只有整体和前后摇摆路径距离、膝关节末端屈曲角度、深蹲总时间和腘绳肌柔韧性与临床普拉提方法有中度到高度的一致性。结论单腿深蹲姿势摇摆参数和腘绳肌柔韧性可以客观地识别非特异性慢性腰痛成人的问题侧。
Identifying the Problem Side with Single-Leg Squat and Hamstrings Flexibility for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
Background and Objectives: In patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP), their pain and problem sides can differ. Clinical Pilates assessment provides an approach to identify the problem side, but this approach requires experience and can be subjective. This study aimed to investigate if objective measures of single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility could identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP. Materials and Methods: Forty adults with non-specific chronic LBP were tested on single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility. The problem side of participants was assessed with the Clinical Pilates method. Paired t-tests were used to compare the postural sway parameters of the single-leg squat and hamstrings flexibility between the problem and non-problem sides. Cohen’s kappa was then used to assess the agreement of postural sway and flexibility measures with the Clinical Pilates method. Results: The problem side showed smaller vertical force variance, larger sway path distances, lower peak vertical force, smaller terminal knee flexion angle, longer time to complete the five single-leg squats, and tighter hamstrings as compared to the non-problem side. However, only the overall and anteroposterior sway path distances, terminal knee flexion angle, total squat duration, and hamstrings flexibility yielded moderate to strong agreement with the Clinical Pilates method. Conclusions: Single-leg squat postural sway parameters and hamstrings flexibility can objectively identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP.
期刊介绍:
Publicada con el apoyo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva. Medicina no tiene propósitos comerciales. El objeto de su creación ha sido propender al adelanto de la medicina argentina. Los beneficios que pudieran obtenerse serán aplicados exclusivamente a ese fin.