回归本源!法定审计在法国、德国和英国的独特引入(1844-1935 年)

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Christine Fournès, Helena Karjalainen, Laurent Beduneau-Wang
{"title":"回归本源!法定审计在法国、德国和英国的独特引入(1844-1935 年)","authors":"Christine Fournès, Helena Karjalainen, Laurent Beduneau-Wang","doi":"10.1108/jmh-03-2024-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to better understand auditing practices as a social phenomenon and management practice through a comparative historical analysis of the emergence of statutory auditing in three European countries, namely, France, Great Britain and Germany between 1844 and 1935.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors’ approach is a comparative history relying on a literature review, books pertaining to the period of interest and relevant archives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The three countries’ trajectories were similar. All featured the promulgation of acts at the second half of the 19th century, the development of the accounting profession and the introduction of new acts to further strengthen statutory auditing around the Great Depression. However, each country took a different path because of the degree of regulation. For instance, the regulation strength and the degree of professionalism differed considerably by country. Business secrecy was also a departure point; it ranged from the rejection of auditors as intruders in France to Germany’s exclusively internal auditing and the UK’s peer auditing. The countries also differed on perceptions of the auditor’s role. Auditors were seen through the lens of a general interest mission in France, as advisors to internal governance bodies in Germany and as shareholders’ agents in Great Britain.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper compares three main European countries in the specific context of the introduction of statutory auditing. The findings of this paper are helpful for the international harmonization of auditing standards, as the derived insights provide a better understanding of the differences in the standards’ implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935)\",\"authors\":\"Christine Fournès, Helena Karjalainen, Laurent Beduneau-Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmh-03-2024-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to better understand auditing practices as a social phenomenon and management practice through a comparative historical analysis of the emergence of statutory auditing in three European countries, namely, France, Great Britain and Germany between 1844 and 1935.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors’ approach is a comparative history relying on a literature review, books pertaining to the period of interest and relevant archives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The three countries’ trajectories were similar. All featured the promulgation of acts at the second half of the 19th century, the development of the accounting profession and the introduction of new acts to further strengthen statutory auditing around the Great Depression. However, each country took a different path because of the degree of regulation. For instance, the regulation strength and the degree of professionalism differed considerably by country. Business secrecy was also a departure point; it ranged from the rejection of auditors as intruders in France to Germany’s exclusively internal auditing and the UK’s peer auditing. The countries also differed on perceptions of the auditor’s role. Auditors were seen through the lens of a general interest mission in France, as advisors to internal governance bodies in Germany and as shareholders’ agents in Great Britain.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper compares three main European countries in the specific context of the introduction of statutory auditing. The findings of this paper are helpful for the international harmonization of auditing standards, as the derived insights provide a better understanding of the differences in the standards’ implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management History\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-03-2024-0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-03-2024-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在通过对 1844 年至 1935 年间法定审计在法国、英国和德国这三个欧洲国家的兴起进行历史比较分析,更好地理解作为一种社会现象和管理实践的审计实践。三个国家的发展轨迹相似,都是在 19 世纪下半叶颁布法案,发展会计职业,并在大萧条前后出台新法案进一步加强法定审计。然而,由于监管程度不同,各国的发展道路也不尽相同。例如,各国的监管力度和专业化程度大不相同。商业机密也是一个出发点;从法国拒绝审计师作为入侵者,到德国的完全内部审计和英国的同级审计,不一而足。各国对审计师作用的认识也不尽相同。在法国,审计师被视为普遍利益的使命;在德国,审计师被视为内部治理机构的顾问;在英国,审计师被视为股东的代理人。本文的研究结果有助于审计准则的国际协调,因为本文得出的见解有助于更好地理解准则实施中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935)

Purpose

This paper aims to better understand auditing practices as a social phenomenon and management practice through a comparative historical analysis of the emergence of statutory auditing in three European countries, namely, France, Great Britain and Germany between 1844 and 1935.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors’ approach is a comparative history relying on a literature review, books pertaining to the period of interest and relevant archives.

Findings

The three countries’ trajectories were similar. All featured the promulgation of acts at the second half of the 19th century, the development of the accounting profession and the introduction of new acts to further strengthen statutory auditing around the Great Depression. However, each country took a different path because of the degree of regulation. For instance, the regulation strength and the degree of professionalism differed considerably by country. Business secrecy was also a departure point; it ranged from the rejection of auditors as intruders in France to Germany’s exclusively internal auditing and the UK’s peer auditing. The countries also differed on perceptions of the auditor’s role. Auditors were seen through the lens of a general interest mission in France, as advisors to internal governance bodies in Germany and as shareholders’ agents in Great Britain.

Originality/value

This paper compares three main European countries in the specific context of the introduction of statutory auditing. The findings of this paper are helpful for the international harmonization of auditing standards, as the derived insights provide a better understanding of the differences in the standards’ implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信