{"title":"论高斯基集在核心相关特性方面的特殊化","authors":"Robbie T. Ireland, Laura K. McKemmish","doi":"arxiv-2409.03994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that most quantum chemistry basis sets are designed for\naccurately modelling valence chemistry, these general-purpose basis sets\ncontinue to be widely used to model core-dependent properties. Core-specialised\nbasis sets are designed with specific features to accurately represent the\nbehaviour of the core region. This design typically incorporates Gaussian\nprimitives with higher exponents to capture core behaviour effectively, as well\nas some decontraction of basis functions to provide flexibility in describing\nthe core electronic wave function. The highest Gaussian exponent and the degree\nof contraction for both $s$- and $p$-basis functions effectively characterise\nthese design aspects. In this study, we compare the design and performance of general-purpose basis\nsets against several literature basis sets specifically designed for three\ncore-dependent properties: J coupling constants, hyperfine coupling constants,\nand magnetic shielding constants (used for calculating chemical shifts). Our\nfindings consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in error when\nemploying core-specialised basis sets, often at a marginal increase in\ncomputational cost compared to the popular 6-31G** basis set. Notably, for\nexpedient calculations of J coupling, hyperfine coupling and magnetic shielding\nconstants, we recommend the use of the pcJ-1, EPR-II, and pcSseg-1, basis sets\nrespectively. For higher accuracy, the pcJ-2, EPR-III, and pcSseg-2 basis sets\nare recommended.","PeriodicalId":501304,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Specialisation of Gaussian Basis Sets for Core-Dependent Properties\",\"authors\":\"Robbie T. Ireland, Laura K. McKemmish\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.03994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the fact that most quantum chemistry basis sets are designed for\\naccurately modelling valence chemistry, these general-purpose basis sets\\ncontinue to be widely used to model core-dependent properties. Core-specialised\\nbasis sets are designed with specific features to accurately represent the\\nbehaviour of the core region. This design typically incorporates Gaussian\\nprimitives with higher exponents to capture core behaviour effectively, as well\\nas some decontraction of basis functions to provide flexibility in describing\\nthe core electronic wave function. The highest Gaussian exponent and the degree\\nof contraction for both $s$- and $p$-basis functions effectively characterise\\nthese design aspects. In this study, we compare the design and performance of general-purpose basis\\nsets against several literature basis sets specifically designed for three\\ncore-dependent properties: J coupling constants, hyperfine coupling constants,\\nand magnetic shielding constants (used for calculating chemical shifts). Our\\nfindings consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in error when\\nemploying core-specialised basis sets, often at a marginal increase in\\ncomputational cost compared to the popular 6-31G** basis set. Notably, for\\nexpedient calculations of J coupling, hyperfine coupling and magnetic shielding\\nconstants, we recommend the use of the pcJ-1, EPR-II, and pcSseg-1, basis sets\\nrespectively. For higher accuracy, the pcJ-2, EPR-III, and pcSseg-2 basis sets\\nare recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the Specialisation of Gaussian Basis Sets for Core-Dependent Properties
Despite the fact that most quantum chemistry basis sets are designed for
accurately modelling valence chemistry, these general-purpose basis sets
continue to be widely used to model core-dependent properties. Core-specialised
basis sets are designed with specific features to accurately represent the
behaviour of the core region. This design typically incorporates Gaussian
primitives with higher exponents to capture core behaviour effectively, as well
as some decontraction of basis functions to provide flexibility in describing
the core electronic wave function. The highest Gaussian exponent and the degree
of contraction for both $s$- and $p$-basis functions effectively characterise
these design aspects. In this study, we compare the design and performance of general-purpose basis
sets against several literature basis sets specifically designed for three
core-dependent properties: J coupling constants, hyperfine coupling constants,
and magnetic shielding constants (used for calculating chemical shifts). Our
findings consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in error when
employing core-specialised basis sets, often at a marginal increase in
computational cost compared to the popular 6-31G** basis set. Notably, for
expedient calculations of J coupling, hyperfine coupling and magnetic shielding
constants, we recommend the use of the pcJ-1, EPR-II, and pcSseg-1, basis sets
respectively. For higher accuracy, the pcJ-2, EPR-III, and pcSseg-2 basis sets
are recommended.