设计脊柱关节炎综合护理路径:精益思维方法

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David Lobo‐Prat, Luis Sainz, Ana Laiz, Anna De Dios, Lalis Fontcuberta, Susana Fernández, Montserrat Masip, Pau Riera, Neus Pagès‐Puigdemont, Sandra Ros, Mar Gomis‐Pastor, Hèctor Corominas
{"title":"设计脊柱关节炎综合护理路径:精益思维方法","authors":"David Lobo‐Prat, Luis Sainz, Ana Laiz, Anna De Dios, Lalis Fontcuberta, Susana Fernández, Montserrat Masip, Pau Riera, Neus Pagès‐Puigdemont, Sandra Ros, Mar Gomis‐Pastor, Hèctor Corominas","doi":"10.1111/jep.14132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionIntegrated care pathways (ICPs) are crucial for delivering individualised care. However, the development of ICPs is challenging and must be well designed to provide the expected benefits. Regarding this, healthcare organisations are increasingly adopting management systems based on Lean Thinking to improve their organisational processes by eliminating non‐value‐added steps. This study elucidates the process and evaluates the impact of applying Lean Thinking to redesign an ICP for patients with spondyloarthritis, a chronic inflammatory disease affecting young adults.MethodsA multidisciplinary team was assembled and trained in Lean Thinking. Patient's perspective was gathered through a focus group. Guided by an expert methodologist, the team constructed a value stream map of the entire care pathway and analysed each step. Five work streams were defined to increase value at each step, leading to targeted process improvements. Key process and outcome metrics were collected and compared in 2‐month baseline and post‐implementation audits.ResultsA total of 118 patients were included in the baseline audit (September–October 2022), and 116 in the post‐implementation audit (January–February 2023). Process redesign resulted in statistically significant improvements (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05), including a reduction in the mean number of hospital visits per patient over a 2‐month period from 2.54 (SD = 0.93) to 1.84 (SD = 0.79), an increase in complementary exams scheduled on the same day (81.4% to 94.8%) and an increase in baseline disease and treatment education (from 22.2% to 84.2% and from 18.2% to 84.6%, respectively). Regarding standardisation of clinical practice, there were significant increases in collecting data for medical records on composite activity indices (76.3% to 95.7%), reporting of pharmacological treatment adherence (68.6% to 94%) and providing nonpharmacological recommendations (31.3% to 95.7%).ConclusionsThe application of Lean Thinking to redesign the spondyloarthritis ICP led to significant improvements in outpatient appointment scheduling, reduced patient hospital visits, improved interdepartmental coordination and standardised clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing an integrated care pathway for spondyloarthritis: A Lean Thinking approach\",\"authors\":\"David Lobo‐Prat, Luis Sainz, Ana Laiz, Anna De Dios, Lalis Fontcuberta, Susana Fernández, Montserrat Masip, Pau Riera, Neus Pagès‐Puigdemont, Sandra Ros, Mar Gomis‐Pastor, Hèctor Corominas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionIntegrated care pathways (ICPs) are crucial for delivering individualised care. However, the development of ICPs is challenging and must be well designed to provide the expected benefits. Regarding this, healthcare organisations are increasingly adopting management systems based on Lean Thinking to improve their organisational processes by eliminating non‐value‐added steps. This study elucidates the process and evaluates the impact of applying Lean Thinking to redesign an ICP for patients with spondyloarthritis, a chronic inflammatory disease affecting young adults.MethodsA multidisciplinary team was assembled and trained in Lean Thinking. Patient's perspective was gathered through a focus group. Guided by an expert methodologist, the team constructed a value stream map of the entire care pathway and analysed each step. Five work streams were defined to increase value at each step, leading to targeted process improvements. Key process and outcome metrics were collected and compared in 2‐month baseline and post‐implementation audits.ResultsA total of 118 patients were included in the baseline audit (September–October 2022), and 116 in the post‐implementation audit (January–February 2023). Process redesign resulted in statistically significant improvements (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05), including a reduction in the mean number of hospital visits per patient over a 2‐month period from 2.54 (SD = 0.93) to 1.84 (SD = 0.79), an increase in complementary exams scheduled on the same day (81.4% to 94.8%) and an increase in baseline disease and treatment education (from 22.2% to 84.2% and from 18.2% to 84.6%, respectively). Regarding standardisation of clinical practice, there were significant increases in collecting data for medical records on composite activity indices (76.3% to 95.7%), reporting of pharmacological treatment adherence (68.6% to 94%) and providing nonpharmacological recommendations (31.3% to 95.7%).ConclusionsThe application of Lean Thinking to redesign the spondyloarthritis ICP led to significant improvements in outpatient appointment scheduling, reduced patient hospital visits, improved interdepartmental coordination and standardised clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言综合护理路径(ICP)对于提供个性化护理至关重要。然而,ICP 的开发具有挑战性,必须经过精心设计才能实现预期效益。为此,医疗机构越来越多地采用基于精益思想的管理系统,通过消除非增值步骤来改善组织流程。本研究阐明了应用精益思维重新设计脊柱关节炎(一种影响青壮年的慢性炎症性疾病)患者 ICP 的过程,并评估了其影响。通过焦点小组收集患者的观点。在一位方法论专家的指导下,团队绘制了整个护理路径的价值流图,并对每个步骤进行了分析。确定了五个工作流,以提高每个步骤的价值,从而有针对性地改进流程。在为期 2 个月的基线审计和实施后审计中,收集并比较了关键流程和结果指标。结果 共有 118 名患者参与了基线审计(2022 年 9 月至 10 月),116 名患者参与了实施后审计(2023 年 1 月至 2 月)。流程重新设计带来了统计学意义上的显著改善(p < 0.05),包括每位患者在两个月内的平均医院就诊次数从2.54次(SD = 0.93)减少到1.84次(SD = 0.79),同一天安排的辅助检查增加(81.4%增加到94.8%),基线疾病和治疗教育增加(分别从22.2%增加到84.2%和从18.2%增加到84.6%)。在临床实践标准化方面,在收集综合活动指数的医疗记录数据(从 76.3% 提高到 95.7%)、报告药物治疗依从性(从 68.6% 提高到 94%)和提供非药物治疗建议(从 31.3% 提高到 95.7%)方面均有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing an integrated care pathway for spondyloarthritis: A Lean Thinking approach
IntroductionIntegrated care pathways (ICPs) are crucial for delivering individualised care. However, the development of ICPs is challenging and must be well designed to provide the expected benefits. Regarding this, healthcare organisations are increasingly adopting management systems based on Lean Thinking to improve their organisational processes by eliminating non‐value‐added steps. This study elucidates the process and evaluates the impact of applying Lean Thinking to redesign an ICP for patients with spondyloarthritis, a chronic inflammatory disease affecting young adults.MethodsA multidisciplinary team was assembled and trained in Lean Thinking. Patient's perspective was gathered through a focus group. Guided by an expert methodologist, the team constructed a value stream map of the entire care pathway and analysed each step. Five work streams were defined to increase value at each step, leading to targeted process improvements. Key process and outcome metrics were collected and compared in 2‐month baseline and post‐implementation audits.ResultsA total of 118 patients were included in the baseline audit (September–October 2022), and 116 in the post‐implementation audit (January–February 2023). Process redesign resulted in statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05), including a reduction in the mean number of hospital visits per patient over a 2‐month period from 2.54 (SD = 0.93) to 1.84 (SD = 0.79), an increase in complementary exams scheduled on the same day (81.4% to 94.8%) and an increase in baseline disease and treatment education (from 22.2% to 84.2% and from 18.2% to 84.6%, respectively). Regarding standardisation of clinical practice, there were significant increases in collecting data for medical records on composite activity indices (76.3% to 95.7%), reporting of pharmacological treatment adherence (68.6% to 94%) and providing nonpharmacological recommendations (31.3% to 95.7%).ConclusionsThe application of Lean Thinking to redesign the spondyloarthritis ICP led to significant improvements in outpatient appointment scheduling, reduced patient hospital visits, improved interdepartmental coordination and standardised clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信