{"title":"测定夹芯板剪切性能的试验方法","authors":"Shekhar Silwal, Kristo Mela, Zhongcheng Ma","doi":"10.1177/10996362241278234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents analysis and comparison of test methods for determining transverse shear strength and shear modulus of steel-faced sandwich panels commonly used in construction. The test methods are taken from the governing European standard EN 14509:2013. Two-point loading and four-point loading test methods as well as a full-scale test method are examined. Based on extensive experimental work on sandwich panels with varying core thickness, comprising mineral wool (MW) and polyisocyanurate (PIR) and encompassing both roof and wall panels, this study provides details of the test setup for the four-point loading and vacuum box methods with which a pure shear failure is obtained. Such details are missing from EN 14509. This paper highlights that the two-point loading method fails to consistently produce shear failure, especially in thicker panels, indicating it does not accurately measure transverse shear strength. The results of the experiments conducted in this study indicate that the four-point loading and full-scale test methods provide consistent shear failure for thicker panels while yielding greater transverse shear strength than the two-point loading test in general.","PeriodicalId":17215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test methods for determination of shear properties of sandwich panels\",\"authors\":\"Shekhar Silwal, Kristo Mela, Zhongcheng Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10996362241278234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents analysis and comparison of test methods for determining transverse shear strength and shear modulus of steel-faced sandwich panels commonly used in construction. The test methods are taken from the governing European standard EN 14509:2013. Two-point loading and four-point loading test methods as well as a full-scale test method are examined. Based on extensive experimental work on sandwich panels with varying core thickness, comprising mineral wool (MW) and polyisocyanurate (PIR) and encompassing both roof and wall panels, this study provides details of the test setup for the four-point loading and vacuum box methods with which a pure shear failure is obtained. Such details are missing from EN 14509. This paper highlights that the two-point loading method fails to consistently produce shear failure, especially in thicker panels, indicating it does not accurately measure transverse shear strength. The results of the experiments conducted in this study indicate that the four-point loading and full-scale test methods provide consistent shear failure for thicker panels while yielding greater transverse shear strength than the two-point loading test in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362241278234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10996362241278234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对建筑中常用的钢面夹芯板横向抗剪强度和抗剪模量的测试方法进行了分析和比较。测试方法来自欧洲标准 EN 14509:2013。对两点加载和四点加载测试方法以及全尺寸测试方法进行了研究。本研究基于对不同夹芯厚度的夹芯板(包括矿棉(MW)和聚异氰尿酸酯(PIR))以及屋顶板和墙板的大量实验工作,提供了四点加载和真空箱方法的详细测试设置,通过这些方法可获得纯剪切破坏。EN 14509 中没有这些细节。本文强调了两点加载法无法持续产生剪切破坏,尤其是在较厚的板材中,这表明该方法无法准确测量横向剪切强度。本研究中进行的实验结果表明,四点加载和全尺寸试验方法可为较厚的面板提供一致的剪切破坏,同时产生的横向剪切强度一般比两点加载试验更大。
Test methods for determination of shear properties of sandwich panels
This paper presents analysis and comparison of test methods for determining transverse shear strength and shear modulus of steel-faced sandwich panels commonly used in construction. The test methods are taken from the governing European standard EN 14509:2013. Two-point loading and four-point loading test methods as well as a full-scale test method are examined. Based on extensive experimental work on sandwich panels with varying core thickness, comprising mineral wool (MW) and polyisocyanurate (PIR) and encompassing both roof and wall panels, this study provides details of the test setup for the four-point loading and vacuum box methods with which a pure shear failure is obtained. Such details are missing from EN 14509. This paper highlights that the two-point loading method fails to consistently produce shear failure, especially in thicker panels, indicating it does not accurately measure transverse shear strength. The results of the experiments conducted in this study indicate that the four-point loading and full-scale test methods provide consistent shear failure for thicker panels while yielding greater transverse shear strength than the two-point loading test in general.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials is an international peer reviewed journal that provides a means of communication to fellow engineers and scientists by providing an archival record of developments in the science, technology, and professional practices of sandwich construction throughout the world. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).