增强心电图数据分类的可信度:鲁棒高斯过程方法 (MuyGPs)

Ukamaka V. Nnyaba, Hewan M. Shemtaga, David W. Collins, Amanda L. Muyskens, Benjamin W. Priest, Nedret Billor
{"title":"增强心电图数据分类的可信度:鲁棒高斯过程方法 (MuyGPs)","authors":"Ukamaka V. Nnyaba, Hewan M. Shemtaga, David W. Collins, Amanda L. Muyskens, Benjamin W. Priest, Nedret Billor","doi":"arxiv-2409.04642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing electrocardiography (ECG) data is essential for diagnosing and\nmonitoring various heart diseases. The clinical adoption of automated methods\nrequires accurate confidence measurements, which are largely absent from\nexisting classification methods. In this paper, we present a robust Gaussian\nProcess classification hyperparameter training model (MuyGPs) for discerning\nnormal heartbeat signals from the signals affected by different arrhythmias and\nmyocardial infarction. We compare the performance of MuyGPs with traditional\nGaussian process classifier as well as conventional machine learning models,\nsuch as, Random Forest, Extra Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors and Convolutional\nNeural Network. Comparing these models reveals MuyGPs as the most performant\nmodel for making confident predictions on individual patient ECGs. Furthermore,\nwe explore the posterior distribution obtained from the Gaussian process to\ninterpret the prediction and quantify uncertainty. In addition, we provide a\nguideline on obtaining the prediction confidence of the machine learning models\nand quantitatively compare the uncertainty measures of these models.\nParticularly, we identify a class of less-accurate (ambiguous) signals for\nfurther diagnosis by an expert.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Electrocardiography Data Classification Confidence: A Robust Gaussian Process Approach (MuyGPs)\",\"authors\":\"Ukamaka V. Nnyaba, Hewan M. Shemtaga, David W. Collins, Amanda L. Muyskens, Benjamin W. Priest, Nedret Billor\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analyzing electrocardiography (ECG) data is essential for diagnosing and\\nmonitoring various heart diseases. The clinical adoption of automated methods\\nrequires accurate confidence measurements, which are largely absent from\\nexisting classification methods. In this paper, we present a robust Gaussian\\nProcess classification hyperparameter training model (MuyGPs) for discerning\\nnormal heartbeat signals from the signals affected by different arrhythmias and\\nmyocardial infarction. We compare the performance of MuyGPs with traditional\\nGaussian process classifier as well as conventional machine learning models,\\nsuch as, Random Forest, Extra Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors and Convolutional\\nNeural Network. Comparing these models reveals MuyGPs as the most performant\\nmodel for making confident predictions on individual patient ECGs. Furthermore,\\nwe explore the posterior distribution obtained from the Gaussian process to\\ninterpret the prediction and quantify uncertainty. In addition, we provide a\\nguideline on obtaining the prediction confidence of the machine learning models\\nand quantitatively compare the uncertainty measures of these models.\\nParticularly, we identify a class of less-accurate (ambiguous) signals for\\nfurther diagnosis by an expert.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析心电图(ECG)数据对于诊断和监测各种心脏疾病至关重要。自动方法的临床应用需要精确的置信度测量,而现有的分类方法大多不具备这种能力。在本文中,我们提出了一种鲁棒高斯过程分类超参数训练模型(MuyGPs),用于从受不同心律失常和心肌梗塞影响的信号中分辨出正常心跳信号。我们将 MuyGPs 的性能与传统高斯过程分类器以及随机森林、额外树、k-近邻和卷积神经网络等传统机器学习模型进行了比较。对这些模型进行比较后发现,MuyGPs 是对单个患者心电图进行可靠预测的性能最好的模型。此外,我们还探索了从高斯过程中获得的后验分布,以解释预测结果并量化不确定性。此外,我们还提供了获得机器学习模型预测置信度的指南,并定量比较了这些模型的不确定性度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Electrocardiography Data Classification Confidence: A Robust Gaussian Process Approach (MuyGPs)
Analyzing electrocardiography (ECG) data is essential for diagnosing and monitoring various heart diseases. The clinical adoption of automated methods requires accurate confidence measurements, which are largely absent from existing classification methods. In this paper, we present a robust Gaussian Process classification hyperparameter training model (MuyGPs) for discerning normal heartbeat signals from the signals affected by different arrhythmias and myocardial infarction. We compare the performance of MuyGPs with traditional Gaussian process classifier as well as conventional machine learning models, such as, Random Forest, Extra Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors and Convolutional Neural Network. Comparing these models reveals MuyGPs as the most performant model for making confident predictions on individual patient ECGs. Furthermore, we explore the posterior distribution obtained from the Gaussian process to interpret the prediction and quantify uncertainty. In addition, we provide a guideline on obtaining the prediction confidence of the machine learning models and quantitatively compare the uncertainty measures of these models. Particularly, we identify a class of less-accurate (ambiguous) signals for further diagnosis by an expert.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信