基于物理化学检测和模拟建模了解穿孔引爆失效机理

IF 2.8 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Processes Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.3390/pr12091971
Chaofeng Chen, Xihe Liu, Dong Ruan, Xueru Chen, Xiangtong Yang, Kun Ning, Zhilong Lian
{"title":"基于物理化学检测和模拟建模了解穿孔引爆失效机理","authors":"Chaofeng Chen, Xihe Liu, Dong Ruan, Xueru Chen, Xiangtong Yang, Kun Ning, Zhilong Lian","doi":"10.3390/pr12091971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With advancements in the exploration and development of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas resources, the number of ultra-deep wells continues to rise globally. This trend places higher demands on testing technology. The combined perforating and testing technique, an established method for deep and ultra-deep wells, faces challenges. Frequent test operation failures due to perforation detonation failure increase down-hole complexity, restricting the timeliness of testing operations. Current methods use mechanical calibration software to calculate the minimum safety factor of the tubing string for safety assessments. However, without a thorough understanding of perforation detonation failure theory, existing mechanical analysis software remains unreliable for assessing well safety during operations. Simply using the safety factor method lacks reliability and cannot explain the causes of perforation detonation failure. This paper examines an ultra-deep well, referred to as TW1, to analyze perforation detonation failure mechanisms. Through metal microstructure examinations, chemical composition analysis, electron microscope scanning, and numerical simulation, the study yields the following insights: (1) The packer mandrel of Well TW1 fractured due to overstress from the detonation waves. (2) Detonation wave propagation patterns along the tubing string during perforation become apparent. (3) Simulation methods reconstruct the perforation detonation process, calculating effective stress at different tubing string positions over time. (4) It introduces an innovative approach for assessing perforation detonation failure mechanisms through a combination of laboratory testing and simulation modeling.","PeriodicalId":20597,"journal":{"name":"Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Perforation Detonation Failure Mechanisms Based on Physicochemical Detection and Simulation Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Chaofeng Chen, Xihe Liu, Dong Ruan, Xueru Chen, Xiangtong Yang, Kun Ning, Zhilong Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pr12091971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With advancements in the exploration and development of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas resources, the number of ultra-deep wells continues to rise globally. This trend places higher demands on testing technology. The combined perforating and testing technique, an established method for deep and ultra-deep wells, faces challenges. Frequent test operation failures due to perforation detonation failure increase down-hole complexity, restricting the timeliness of testing operations. Current methods use mechanical calibration software to calculate the minimum safety factor of the tubing string for safety assessments. However, without a thorough understanding of perforation detonation failure theory, existing mechanical analysis software remains unreliable for assessing well safety during operations. Simply using the safety factor method lacks reliability and cannot explain the causes of perforation detonation failure. This paper examines an ultra-deep well, referred to as TW1, to analyze perforation detonation failure mechanisms. Through metal microstructure examinations, chemical composition analysis, electron microscope scanning, and numerical simulation, the study yields the following insights: (1) The packer mandrel of Well TW1 fractured due to overstress from the detonation waves. (2) Detonation wave propagation patterns along the tubing string during perforation become apparent. (3) Simulation methods reconstruct the perforation detonation process, calculating effective stress at different tubing string positions over time. (4) It introduces an innovative approach for assessing perforation detonation failure mechanisms through a combination of laboratory testing and simulation modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Processes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着深层和超深层油气资源勘探和开发的进展,全球超深井的数量不断增加。这一趋势对测试技术提出了更高的要求。射孔与测试相结合的技术是深井和超深井的既定方法,但也面临着挑战。由于射孔起爆失败导致的测试操作失败频发,增加了井下的复杂性,限制了测试操作的及时性。目前的方法使用机械校准软件来计算油管串的最小安全系数,以进行安全评估。然而,由于对射孔爆破失效理论缺乏透彻的了解,现有的机械分析软件在评估作业期间的油井安全方面仍然不可靠。简单地使用安全系数方法缺乏可靠性,也无法解释射孔起爆失效的原因。本文研究了一口超深井(简称 TW1),以分析射孔爆燃失效机理。通过金属微观结构检查、化学成分分析、电子显微镜扫描和数值模拟,研究得出以下结论:(1)TW1 井的封隔器芯轴因引爆波产生的过应力而断裂。(2) 在射孔过程中,引爆波沿油管串的传播模式变得明显。(3) 模拟方法重建了射孔起爆过程,计算了不同管柱位置随时间变化的有效应力。(4) 介绍了一种创新方法,通过实验室测试和模拟建模相结合的方式评估射孔起爆失效机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Perforation Detonation Failure Mechanisms Based on Physicochemical Detection and Simulation Modeling
With advancements in the exploration and development of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas resources, the number of ultra-deep wells continues to rise globally. This trend places higher demands on testing technology. The combined perforating and testing technique, an established method for deep and ultra-deep wells, faces challenges. Frequent test operation failures due to perforation detonation failure increase down-hole complexity, restricting the timeliness of testing operations. Current methods use mechanical calibration software to calculate the minimum safety factor of the tubing string for safety assessments. However, without a thorough understanding of perforation detonation failure theory, existing mechanical analysis software remains unreliable for assessing well safety during operations. Simply using the safety factor method lacks reliability and cannot explain the causes of perforation detonation failure. This paper examines an ultra-deep well, referred to as TW1, to analyze perforation detonation failure mechanisms. Through metal microstructure examinations, chemical composition analysis, electron microscope scanning, and numerical simulation, the study yields the following insights: (1) The packer mandrel of Well TW1 fractured due to overstress from the detonation waves. (2) Detonation wave propagation patterns along the tubing string during perforation become apparent. (3) Simulation methods reconstruct the perforation detonation process, calculating effective stress at different tubing string positions over time. (4) It introduces an innovative approach for assessing perforation detonation failure mechanisms through a combination of laboratory testing and simulation modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Processes
Processes Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
2239
审稿时长
14.11 days
期刊介绍: Processes (ISSN 2227-9717) provides an advanced forum for process related research in chemistry, biology and allied engineering fields. The journal publishes regular research papers, communications, letters, short notes and reviews. Our aim is to encourage researchers to publish their experimental, theoretical and computational results in as much detail as necessary. There is no restriction on paper length or number of figures and tables.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信