Andrius Burnelis, Vojta Kejzlar, Daniel R. Phillips
{"title":"{}^3$He-${}^4$He散射有效范围参数的变量推断","authors":"Andrius Burnelis, Vojta Kejzlar, Daniel R. Phillips","doi":"arxiv-2408.13250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use two different methods, Monte Carlo sampling and variational inference\n(VI), to perform a Bayesian calibration of the effective-range parameters in\n${}^3$He-${}^4$He elastic scattering. The parameters are calibrated to data\nfrom a recent set of $^{3}$He-${}^4$He elastic scattering differential cross\nsection measurements. Analysis of these data for $E_{\\rm lab} \\leq 4.3$ MeV\nyields a unimodal posterior for which both methods obtain the same structure.\nHowever, the effective-range expansion amplitude does not account for the\n$7/2^-$ state of ${}^7$Be so, even after calibration, the description of data\nat the upper end of this energy range is poor. The data up to $E_{\\rm lab}=2.6$\nMeV can be well described, but calibration to this lower-energy subset of the\ndata yields a bimodal posterior. After adapting VI to treat such a multi-modal\nposterior we find good agreement between the VI results and those obtained with\nparallel-tempered Monte Carlo sampling.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variational inference of effective range parameters for ${}^3$He-${}^4$He scattering\",\"authors\":\"Andrius Burnelis, Vojta Kejzlar, Daniel R. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.13250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use two different methods, Monte Carlo sampling and variational inference\\n(VI), to perform a Bayesian calibration of the effective-range parameters in\\n${}^3$He-${}^4$He elastic scattering. The parameters are calibrated to data\\nfrom a recent set of $^{3}$He-${}^4$He elastic scattering differential cross\\nsection measurements. Analysis of these data for $E_{\\\\rm lab} \\\\leq 4.3$ MeV\\nyields a unimodal posterior for which both methods obtain the same structure.\\nHowever, the effective-range expansion amplitude does not account for the\\n$7/2^-$ state of ${}^7$Be so, even after calibration, the description of data\\nat the upper end of this energy range is poor. The data up to $E_{\\\\rm lab}=2.6$\\nMeV can be well described, but calibration to this lower-energy subset of the\\ndata yields a bimodal posterior. After adapting VI to treat such a multi-modal\\nposterior we find good agreement between the VI results and those obtained with\\nparallel-tempered Monte Carlo sampling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variational inference of effective range parameters for ${}^3$He-${}^4$He scattering
We use two different methods, Monte Carlo sampling and variational inference
(VI), to perform a Bayesian calibration of the effective-range parameters in
${}^3$He-${}^4$He elastic scattering. The parameters are calibrated to data
from a recent set of $^{3}$He-${}^4$He elastic scattering differential cross
section measurements. Analysis of these data for $E_{\rm lab} \leq 4.3$ MeV
yields a unimodal posterior for which both methods obtain the same structure.
However, the effective-range expansion amplitude does not account for the
$7/2^-$ state of ${}^7$Be so, even after calibration, the description of data
at the upper end of this energy range is poor. The data up to $E_{\rm lab}=2.6$
MeV can be well described, but calibration to this lower-energy subset of the
data yields a bimodal posterior. After adapting VI to treat such a multi-modal
posterior we find good agreement between the VI results and those obtained with
parallel-tempered Monte Carlo sampling.