自上而下和自下而上:在 1/\Lambda^2$ 中研究超前阶 SMEFT

IF 4.6 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tyler Corbett
{"title":"自上而下和自下而上:在 1/\\Lambda^2$ 中研究超前阶 SMEFT","authors":"Tyler Corbett","doi":"10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.3.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to assess the relevance of higher order terms in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) expansion we consider four new physics models and their impact on the Drell Yan cross section. Of these four, one scalar model has no effect on Drell Yan, a model of fermions while appearing to generate a momentum expansion actually belongs to the vacuum expectation value expansion and so has a nominal effect on the process. The remaining two, a leptoquark and a $Z'$ model exhibit a momentum expansion. After matching these models to dimension-ten we study the how the inclusion of dimension-eight and dimension-ten operators in hypothetical effective field theory fits to the full ultraviolet models impacts fits. We do this both in the top-down approach, and in a very limited approximation to the bottom up approach of the SMEFT to infer the impact of a fully general fit to the SMEFT. We find that for the more weakly coupled models a strictly dimension-six fit is sufficient. In contrast when stronger interactions or lighter masses are considered the inclusion of dimension-eight operators becomes necessary. However, their Wilson coefficients perform the role of nuisance parameters with best fit values which can differ statistically from the theory prediction. In the most strongly coupled theories considered (which are already ruled out by data) the inclusion of dimension-ten operators allows for the measurement of dimension-eight operator coefficients consistent with theory predictions and the dimension-ten operator coefficients then behave as nuisance parameters. We also study the impact of the inclusion of partial next order results, such as dimension-six squared contributions, and find that in some cases they improve the convergence of the series while in others they hinder it.","PeriodicalId":21682,"journal":{"name":"SciPost Physics","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Top-down and bottom-up: Studying the SMEFT beyond leading order in $1/\\\\Lambda^2$\",\"authors\":\"Tyler Corbett\",\"doi\":\"10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.3.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to assess the relevance of higher order terms in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) expansion we consider four new physics models and their impact on the Drell Yan cross section. Of these four, one scalar model has no effect on Drell Yan, a model of fermions while appearing to generate a momentum expansion actually belongs to the vacuum expectation value expansion and so has a nominal effect on the process. The remaining two, a leptoquark and a $Z'$ model exhibit a momentum expansion. After matching these models to dimension-ten we study the how the inclusion of dimension-eight and dimension-ten operators in hypothetical effective field theory fits to the full ultraviolet models impacts fits. We do this both in the top-down approach, and in a very limited approximation to the bottom up approach of the SMEFT to infer the impact of a fully general fit to the SMEFT. We find that for the more weakly coupled models a strictly dimension-six fit is sufficient. In contrast when stronger interactions or lighter masses are considered the inclusion of dimension-eight operators becomes necessary. However, their Wilson coefficients perform the role of nuisance parameters with best fit values which can differ statistically from the theory prediction. In the most strongly coupled theories considered (which are already ruled out by data) the inclusion of dimension-ten operators allows for the measurement of dimension-eight operator coefficients consistent with theory predictions and the dimension-ten operator coefficients then behave as nuisance parameters. We also study the impact of the inclusion of partial next order results, such as dimension-six squared contributions, and find that in some cases they improve the convergence of the series while in others they hinder it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SciPost Physics\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SciPost Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.3.053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciPost Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.3.053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估标准模型有效场论(SMEFT)扩展中高阶项的相关性,我们考虑了四种新物理模型及其对德雷尔-燕截面的影响。在这四个模型中,一个标量模型对德雷尔-杨没有影响,一个费米子模型虽然看起来产生了动量扩展,但实际上属于真空期望值扩展,因此对过程只有名义上的影响。其余两个模型,一个七夸克模型和一个$Z'$模型则表现出动量膨胀。在把这些模型匹配到十维之后,我们研究了在假设有效场理论拟合全紫外模型时加入八维和十维算子对拟合的影响。我们通过自上而下的方法,以及对 SMEFT 自下而上的方法进行非常有限的近似,来推断对 SMEFT 进行完全一般拟合的影响。我们发现,对于弱耦合模型,严格的六维度拟合就足够了。相反,当考虑到较强的相互作用或较轻的质量时,就有必要加入八维算子。然而,这些算子的威尔逊系数扮演着干扰参数的角色,其最佳拟合值可能与理论预测值存在统计差异。在所考虑的最强耦合理论中(数据已经排除了这些理论),加入十维算子可以测量出与理论预言一致的八维算子系数,而十维算子系数则表现为骚扰参数。我们还研究了加入部分下阶结果(如六维平方贡献)的影响,发现在某些情况下,它们会改善序列的收敛性,而在另一些情况下,它们会阻碍收敛性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Top-down and bottom-up: Studying the SMEFT beyond leading order in $1/\Lambda^2$
In order to assess the relevance of higher order terms in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) expansion we consider four new physics models and their impact on the Drell Yan cross section. Of these four, one scalar model has no effect on Drell Yan, a model of fermions while appearing to generate a momentum expansion actually belongs to the vacuum expectation value expansion and so has a nominal effect on the process. The remaining two, a leptoquark and a $Z'$ model exhibit a momentum expansion. After matching these models to dimension-ten we study the how the inclusion of dimension-eight and dimension-ten operators in hypothetical effective field theory fits to the full ultraviolet models impacts fits. We do this both in the top-down approach, and in a very limited approximation to the bottom up approach of the SMEFT to infer the impact of a fully general fit to the SMEFT. We find that for the more weakly coupled models a strictly dimension-six fit is sufficient. In contrast when stronger interactions or lighter masses are considered the inclusion of dimension-eight operators becomes necessary. However, their Wilson coefficients perform the role of nuisance parameters with best fit values which can differ statistically from the theory prediction. In the most strongly coupled theories considered (which are already ruled out by data) the inclusion of dimension-ten operators allows for the measurement of dimension-eight operator coefficients consistent with theory predictions and the dimension-ten operator coefficients then behave as nuisance parameters. We also study the impact of the inclusion of partial next order results, such as dimension-six squared contributions, and find that in some cases they improve the convergence of the series while in others they hinder it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SciPost Physics
SciPost Physics Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (all)
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.70%
发文量
315
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: SciPost Physics publishes breakthrough research articles in the whole field of Physics, covering Experimental, Theoretical and Computational approaches. Specialties covered by this Journal: - Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Experiment - Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Theory - Biophysics - Condensed Matter Physics - Experiment - Condensed Matter Physics - Theory - Condensed Matter Physics - Computational - Fluid Dynamics - Gravitation, Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics - High-Energy Physics - Experiment - High-Energy Physics - Theory - High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology - Mathematical Physics - Nuclear Physics - Experiment - Nuclear Physics - Theory - Quantum Physics - Statistical and Soft Matter Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信