将阿克拉气候行动计划作为实现可持续发展的纵向一体化案例进行评估

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Desmond Adjaison, Antwi-Boasiako Amoah
{"title":"将阿克拉气候行动计划作为实现可持续发展的纵向一体化案例进行评估","authors":"Desmond Adjaison, Antwi-Boasiako Amoah","doi":"10.1007/s10668-024-05341-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The compounding effects of rapid urbanization and climate change are driving cities in the Global South to urgently require localized intervention. This imperative hinges on the existence of robust institutional frameworks and strategies. The researchers observed that Accra’s Climate Action Plan (ACAP) in Ghana incorporates enabling factors that support urban climate governance; nevertheless, there is a lack of clarity regarding the key success implementation indicators that have been integrated to determine sustainable outcomes. The article, therefore, aims to qualitatively evaluate the governance frameworks and strategies put in place to attain a sustainable future in Accra by 2030. The evaluation of strategies focuses on two fundamental domains: stakeholder engagement and policy instruments. The governance framework is examined in terms of budget and funding options; monitoring and evaluation processes, internal coordination and cross-sector collaboration. The study employs interviews, content analysis, and a three-dimensional framework to assess sustainable development synergies. The findings of the study reveal specific policy instruments that are suboptimal at the local scale due to prevailing decentralized frameworks constraining the city’s autonomy. Furthermore, the ACAP has yet to be integrated into the city’s budget, with funding remaining limited. The institutional integration of ACAP is also significantly hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies, limitations in monitoring and evaluation framework, and weakness in both internal and cross-sectoral collaborations. Another evidence from this study is that ACAP, while conducive for promoting sustainable development, shows limitations in addressing social sustainability. This is attributed to the absence of a comprehensive social risk and gender-responsive analysis of the impacts associated with the implementation of ACAP. The article thus concludes that the pursuit of a sustainable urban future in Accra remains impeded, unless meaningful efforts are directed toward enhancing the governance framework and revising the policy. The study recommends a more systematic analysis of policies to promote stronger social sustainability, inter alia. Policymakers and scholars focusing on local climate policy and sustainable urban development can find utility in the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":540,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Accra’s Climate Action Plan as a case of vertical integration to achieve sustainable development\",\"authors\":\"Desmond Adjaison, Antwi-Boasiako Amoah\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10668-024-05341-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The compounding effects of rapid urbanization and climate change are driving cities in the Global South to urgently require localized intervention. This imperative hinges on the existence of robust institutional frameworks and strategies. The researchers observed that Accra’s Climate Action Plan (ACAP) in Ghana incorporates enabling factors that support urban climate governance; nevertheless, there is a lack of clarity regarding the key success implementation indicators that have been integrated to determine sustainable outcomes. The article, therefore, aims to qualitatively evaluate the governance frameworks and strategies put in place to attain a sustainable future in Accra by 2030. The evaluation of strategies focuses on two fundamental domains: stakeholder engagement and policy instruments. The governance framework is examined in terms of budget and funding options; monitoring and evaluation processes, internal coordination and cross-sector collaboration. The study employs interviews, content analysis, and a three-dimensional framework to assess sustainable development synergies. The findings of the study reveal specific policy instruments that are suboptimal at the local scale due to prevailing decentralized frameworks constraining the city’s autonomy. Furthermore, the ACAP has yet to be integrated into the city’s budget, with funding remaining limited. The institutional integration of ACAP is also significantly hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies, limitations in monitoring and evaluation framework, and weakness in both internal and cross-sectoral collaborations. Another evidence from this study is that ACAP, while conducive for promoting sustainable development, shows limitations in addressing social sustainability. This is attributed to the absence of a comprehensive social risk and gender-responsive analysis of the impacts associated with the implementation of ACAP. The article thus concludes that the pursuit of a sustainable urban future in Accra remains impeded, unless meaningful efforts are directed toward enhancing the governance framework and revising the policy. The study recommends a more systematic analysis of policies to promote stronger social sustainability, inter alia. Policymakers and scholars focusing on local climate policy and sustainable urban development can find utility in the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment, Development and Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment, Development and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05341-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05341-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速城市化和气候变化的复合效应促使全球南部的城市迫切需要本地化的干预措施。这一迫切需要取决于是否存在强有力的制度框架和战略。研究人员注意到,加纳的阿克拉气候行动计划(ACAP)纳入了支持城市气候治理的有利因素;然而,在确定可持续成果的关键成功实施指标方面缺乏明确性。因此,本文旨在定性评估为在 2030 年之前在阿克拉实现可持续未来而制定的治理框架和战略。战略评估侧重于两个基本领域:利益相关者的参与和政策工具。治理框架从预算和资金选择、监测和评估过程、内部协调和跨部门合作等方面进行审查。研究采用访谈、内容分析和三维框架来评估可持续发展的协同作用。研究结果表明,由于现行的权力下放框架限制了城市的自主权,一些具体的政策工具在地方范围内并不理想。此外,《亚洲及太平洋行动计划》尚未纳入城市预算,资金仍然有限。官僚机构的低效率、监督和评估框架的局限性以及内部和跨部门合作的薄弱也严重阻碍了 ACAP 的机构整合。本研究的另一个证据是,《亚洲及太平洋行动计划》虽然有利于促进可持续发展,但在解决社会可持续发展问题方面却表现出局限性。这是因为缺乏对实施 ACAP 所产生影响的全面社会风险和促进性别平等的分析。因此,文章得出结论认为,除非在加强治理框架和修订政策方面做出有意义的努力,否则阿克拉追求可持续城市未来的努力仍将受到阻碍。研究建议对政策进行更系统的分析,以促进更强的社会可持续性。关注地方气候政策和可持续城市发展的决策者和学者可以从研究结果中找到有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing Accra’s Climate Action Plan as a case of vertical integration to achieve sustainable development

Assessing Accra’s Climate Action Plan as a case of vertical integration to achieve sustainable development

The compounding effects of rapid urbanization and climate change are driving cities in the Global South to urgently require localized intervention. This imperative hinges on the existence of robust institutional frameworks and strategies. The researchers observed that Accra’s Climate Action Plan (ACAP) in Ghana incorporates enabling factors that support urban climate governance; nevertheless, there is a lack of clarity regarding the key success implementation indicators that have been integrated to determine sustainable outcomes. The article, therefore, aims to qualitatively evaluate the governance frameworks and strategies put in place to attain a sustainable future in Accra by 2030. The evaluation of strategies focuses on two fundamental domains: stakeholder engagement and policy instruments. The governance framework is examined in terms of budget and funding options; monitoring and evaluation processes, internal coordination and cross-sector collaboration. The study employs interviews, content analysis, and a three-dimensional framework to assess sustainable development synergies. The findings of the study reveal specific policy instruments that are suboptimal at the local scale due to prevailing decentralized frameworks constraining the city’s autonomy. Furthermore, the ACAP has yet to be integrated into the city’s budget, with funding remaining limited. The institutional integration of ACAP is also significantly hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies, limitations in monitoring and evaluation framework, and weakness in both internal and cross-sectoral collaborations. Another evidence from this study is that ACAP, while conducive for promoting sustainable development, shows limitations in addressing social sustainability. This is attributed to the absence of a comprehensive social risk and gender-responsive analysis of the impacts associated with the implementation of ACAP. The article thus concludes that the pursuit of a sustainable urban future in Accra remains impeded, unless meaningful efforts are directed toward enhancing the governance framework and revising the policy. The study recommends a more systematic analysis of policies to promote stronger social sustainability, inter alia. Policymakers and scholars focusing on local climate policy and sustainable urban development can find utility in the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Environment, Development and Sustainability Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
754
期刊介绍: Environment, Development and Sustainability is an international and multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of the environmental impacts of socio-economic development. It is also concerned with the complex interactions which occur between development and environment, and its purpose is to seek ways and means for achieving sustainability in all human activities aimed at such development. The subject matter of the journal includes the following and related issues: -mutual interactions among society, development and environment, and their implications for sustainable development -technical, economic, ethical and philosophical aspects of sustainable development -global sustainability - the obstacles and ways in which they could be overcome -local and regional sustainability initiatives, their practical implementation, and relevance for use in a wider context -development and application of indicators of sustainability -development, verification, implementation and monitoring of policies for sustainable development -sustainable use of land, water, energy and biological resources in development -impacts of agriculture and forestry activities on soil and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity -effects of energy use and global climate change on development and sustainability -impacts of population growth and human activities on food and other essential resources for development -role of national and international agencies, and of international aid and trade arrangements in sustainable development -social and cultural contexts of sustainable development -role of education and public awareness in sustainable development -role of political and economic instruments in sustainable development -shortcomings of sustainable development and its alternatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信