{"title":"克利福德轨道和稳定器状态","authors":"Lingxuan Feng and Shunlong Luo","doi":"10.1088/1751-8121/ad7710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stabilizer states serve as ‘classical objects’ in the stabilizer formalism of quantum theory, and play an important role in quantum error correction, fault-tolerant quantum computation, and quantum communication. They provide an efficient description of many basic features of quantum theory and exhibit a rich structure. For prime dimensional systems, they may be defined by two quite different yet equivalent ways: The first is via stabilizer groups (maximal Abelian subgroups of the discrete Heisenberg–Weyl group). The second is via the orbits of the Clifford group acting on any computational basis state. However, in a general dimensional system, this equivalence breaks down, and consequently, it is desirable to clarify the difference and relation between the above two approaches to stabilizer states. In this work, we show that these two approaches are equivalent if and only if the system dimension is square-free (i.e. has no square factor). Furthermore, we completely reveal the relation between the Clifford orbits and stabilizer states in an arbitrary dimensional system, derive the explicit expressions of the Clifford orbits and determine their cardinalities.","PeriodicalId":16763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clifford orbits and stabilizer states\",\"authors\":\"Lingxuan Feng and Shunlong Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1751-8121/ad7710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stabilizer states serve as ‘classical objects’ in the stabilizer formalism of quantum theory, and play an important role in quantum error correction, fault-tolerant quantum computation, and quantum communication. They provide an efficient description of many basic features of quantum theory and exhibit a rich structure. For prime dimensional systems, they may be defined by two quite different yet equivalent ways: The first is via stabilizer groups (maximal Abelian subgroups of the discrete Heisenberg–Weyl group). The second is via the orbits of the Clifford group acting on any computational basis state. However, in a general dimensional system, this equivalence breaks down, and consequently, it is desirable to clarify the difference and relation between the above two approaches to stabilizer states. In this work, we show that these two approaches are equivalent if and only if the system dimension is square-free (i.e. has no square factor). Furthermore, we completely reveal the relation between the Clifford orbits and stabilizer states in an arbitrary dimensional system, derive the explicit expressions of the Clifford orbits and determine their cardinalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad7710\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad7710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stabilizer states serve as ‘classical objects’ in the stabilizer formalism of quantum theory, and play an important role in quantum error correction, fault-tolerant quantum computation, and quantum communication. They provide an efficient description of many basic features of quantum theory and exhibit a rich structure. For prime dimensional systems, they may be defined by two quite different yet equivalent ways: The first is via stabilizer groups (maximal Abelian subgroups of the discrete Heisenberg–Weyl group). The second is via the orbits of the Clifford group acting on any computational basis state. However, in a general dimensional system, this equivalence breaks down, and consequently, it is desirable to clarify the difference and relation between the above two approaches to stabilizer states. In this work, we show that these two approaches are equivalent if and only if the system dimension is square-free (i.e. has no square factor). Furthermore, we completely reveal the relation between the Clifford orbits and stabilizer states in an arbitrary dimensional system, derive the explicit expressions of the Clifford orbits and determine their cardinalities.
期刊介绍:
Publishing 50 issues a year, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical is a major journal of theoretical physics reporting research on the mathematical structures that describe fundamental processes of the physical world and on the analytical, computational and numerical methods for exploring these structures.