通过对六种胎儿心脏超声生物测量技术进行可扩展的综合分析,提高先天性心脏病的产前检测水平

Aneela Reddy, Sara Rizvi, Anita Moon-Grady, Rima Arnaout
{"title":"通过对六种胎儿心脏超声生物测量技术进行可扩展的综合分析,提高先天性心脏病的产前检测水平","authors":"Aneela Reddy, Sara Rizvi, Anita Moon-Grady, Rima Arnaout","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.13.24311793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although screening of prenatal congenital heart disease (CHD) has improved over the last decade, the diagnosis rate can still be as low as 40%. The axial 4 chamber (A4C) is the most reliably obtained cardiac view in the fetal screening ultrasound but alone only has a maximum clinical sensitivity of 50-60%, particularly in large multicenter studies in low-risk populations. Standard biometrics, like cardiac axis (CA), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and cardiac chamber fractional area change (FAC), have individually been shown to be useful for CHD screening and can all be obtained from A4C alone. However, these biometrics are vastly underutilized because they are time-consuming to extract and difficult to interpret all at once. We hypothesized that using six standard biometrics in combination can improve complex CHD screening versus any one biometric alone. K-means clustering was performed to segregate the patterns of heart measurements into clusters. Sensitivity and specificity for CHD was 87% and 75%, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that a composite of six standard biometric has better sensitivity and accuracy for CHD than any one biometric alone and better than A4C visual assessment.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving prenatal detection of congenital heart disease with a scalable composite analysis of six fetal cardiac ultrasound biometrics\",\"authors\":\"Aneela Reddy, Sara Rizvi, Anita Moon-Grady, Rima Arnaout\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.13.24311793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although screening of prenatal congenital heart disease (CHD) has improved over the last decade, the diagnosis rate can still be as low as 40%. The axial 4 chamber (A4C) is the most reliably obtained cardiac view in the fetal screening ultrasound but alone only has a maximum clinical sensitivity of 50-60%, particularly in large multicenter studies in low-risk populations. Standard biometrics, like cardiac axis (CA), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and cardiac chamber fractional area change (FAC), have individually been shown to be useful for CHD screening and can all be obtained from A4C alone. However, these biometrics are vastly underutilized because they are time-consuming to extract and difficult to interpret all at once. We hypothesized that using six standard biometrics in combination can improve complex CHD screening versus any one biometric alone. K-means clustering was performed to segregate the patterns of heart measurements into clusters. Sensitivity and specificity for CHD was 87% and 75%, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that a composite of six standard biometric has better sensitivity and accuracy for CHD than any one biometric alone and better than A4C visual assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.13.24311793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.13.24311793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管产前先天性心脏病(CHD)筛查在过去十年中有所改善,但诊断率仍可低至 40%。轴向四腔(A4C)是胎儿筛查超声中最可靠的心脏视图,但其临床灵敏度最高仅为 50%-60%,尤其是在低风险人群的大型多中心研究中。标准的生物测量指标,如心轴(CA)、心胸比(CTR)和心腔占位面积变化(FAC),都已被证明对先天性心脏病筛查有用,而且都可以仅通过 A4C 获得。然而,这些生物统计学指标的利用率远远不够,因为它们的提取耗时且难以一次性解释。我们假设,与单独使用任何一种生物测定技术相比,将六种标准生物测定技术结合使用可改善复杂的冠心病筛查。我们进行了 K-means 聚类,将心脏测量的模式分成若干组。对冠心病的敏感性和特异性分别为 87% 和 75%。在此,我们证明了六种标准生物测量的复合方法对心脏病的敏感性和准确性优于任何一种单独的生物测量,也优于 A4C 视觉评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving prenatal detection of congenital heart disease with a scalable composite analysis of six fetal cardiac ultrasound biometrics
Although screening of prenatal congenital heart disease (CHD) has improved over the last decade, the diagnosis rate can still be as low as 40%. The axial 4 chamber (A4C) is the most reliably obtained cardiac view in the fetal screening ultrasound but alone only has a maximum clinical sensitivity of 50-60%, particularly in large multicenter studies in low-risk populations. Standard biometrics, like cardiac axis (CA), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and cardiac chamber fractional area change (FAC), have individually been shown to be useful for CHD screening and can all be obtained from A4C alone. However, these biometrics are vastly underutilized because they are time-consuming to extract and difficult to interpret all at once. We hypothesized that using six standard biometrics in combination can improve complex CHD screening versus any one biometric alone. K-means clustering was performed to segregate the patterns of heart measurements into clusters. Sensitivity and specificity for CHD was 87% and 75%, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that a composite of six standard biometric has better sensitivity and accuracy for CHD than any one biometric alone and better than A4C visual assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信