SPORTSCausal:溢出时间序列因果推理

Carol Liu
{"title":"SPORTSCausal:溢出时间序列因果推理","authors":"Carol Liu","doi":"arxiv-2408.11951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for\ncausal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic\nstudies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary\nadvantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to\nsignificantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on\nstrong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group\nrandomness, which are not always feasible in real-world applications.\nTraditional inferential methods, including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA),\noften fail when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a\nnovel approach named \\textbf{Sp}ill\\textbf{o}ve\\textbf{r} \\textbf{T}ime\n\\textbf{S}eries \\textbf{Causal} (\\verb+SPORTSCausal+), which enables the\nestimation of treatment effects without relying on these stringent assumptions.\nWe demonstrate the practical applicability of \\verb+SPORTSCausal+ through a\nreal-world budget-control experiment. In this experiment, data was collected\nfrom both a 5\\% live experiment and a 50\\% live experiment using the same\ntreatment. Due to the spillover effect, the vanilla estimation of the treatment\neffect was not robust across different treatment sizes, whereas\n\\verb+SPORTSCausal+ provided a robust estimation.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPORTSCausal: Spill-Over Time Series Causal Inference\",\"authors\":\"Carol Liu\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.11951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for\\ncausal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic\\nstudies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary\\nadvantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to\\nsignificantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on\\nstrong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group\\nrandomness, which are not always feasible in real-world applications.\\nTraditional inferential methods, including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA),\\noften fail when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a\\nnovel approach named \\\\textbf{Sp}ill\\\\textbf{o}ve\\\\textbf{r} \\\\textbf{T}ime\\n\\\\textbf{S}eries \\\\textbf{Causal} (\\\\verb+SPORTSCausal+), which enables the\\nestimation of treatment effects without relying on these stringent assumptions.\\nWe demonstrate the practical applicability of \\\\verb+SPORTSCausal+ through a\\nreal-world budget-control experiment. In this experiment, data was collected\\nfrom both a 5\\\\% live experiment and a 50\\\\% live experiment using the same\\ntreatment. Due to the spillover effect, the vanilla estimation of the treatment\\neffect was not robust across different treatment sizes, whereas\\n\\\\verb+SPORTSCausal+ provided a robust estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,随机对照试验(RCT)一直是商业分析、经济研究、社会学、临床研究和网络学习等各个领域进行因果推断的黄金标准。与观察研究相比,RCT 的主要优势在于能够显著降低个体差异带来的噪音。传统的推断方法,包括协方差分析(ANCOVA),在这些假设不成立时往往会失效。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法,名为\verb+SPORTSCausal+),它可以在不依赖这些严格假设的情况下估计治疗效果。在这个实验中,我们使用相同的处理方法从一个 5%的现场实验和一个 50%的现场实验中收集数据。由于溢出效应,在不同的处理规模下,对处理效果的香草估计并不稳健,而verb+SPORTSCausal+则提供了稳健的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SPORTSCausal: Spill-Over Time Series Causal Inference
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for causal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic studies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary advantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to significantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on strong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group randomness, which are not always feasible in real-world applications. Traditional inferential methods, including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), often fail when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a novel approach named \textbf{Sp}ill\textbf{o}ve\textbf{r} \textbf{T}ime \textbf{S}eries \textbf{Causal} (\verb+SPORTSCausal+), which enables the estimation of treatment effects without relying on these stringent assumptions. We demonstrate the practical applicability of \verb+SPORTSCausal+ through a real-world budget-control experiment. In this experiment, data was collected from both a 5\% live experiment and a 50\% live experiment using the same treatment. Due to the spillover effect, the vanilla estimation of the treatment effect was not robust across different treatment sizes, whereas \verb+SPORTSCausal+ provided a robust estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信