{"title":"SPORTSCausal:溢出时间序列因果推理","authors":"Carol Liu","doi":"arxiv-2408.11951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for\ncausal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic\nstudies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary\nadvantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to\nsignificantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on\nstrong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group\nrandomness, which are not always feasible in real-world applications.\nTraditional inferential methods, including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA),\noften fail when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a\nnovel approach named \\textbf{Sp}ill\\textbf{o}ve\\textbf{r} \\textbf{T}ime\n\\textbf{S}eries \\textbf{Causal} (\\verb+SPORTSCausal+), which enables the\nestimation of treatment effects without relying on these stringent assumptions.\nWe demonstrate the practical applicability of \\verb+SPORTSCausal+ through a\nreal-world budget-control experiment. In this experiment, data was collected\nfrom both a 5\\% live experiment and a 50\\% live experiment using the same\ntreatment. Due to the spillover effect, the vanilla estimation of the treatment\neffect was not robust across different treatment sizes, whereas\n\\verb+SPORTSCausal+ provided a robust estimation.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPORTSCausal: Spill-Over Time Series Causal Inference\",\"authors\":\"Carol Liu\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.11951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for\\ncausal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic\\nstudies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary\\nadvantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to\\nsignificantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on\\nstrong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group\\nrandomness, which are not always feasible in real-world applications.\\nTraditional inferential methods, including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA),\\noften fail when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a\\nnovel approach named \\\\textbf{Sp}ill\\\\textbf{o}ve\\\\textbf{r} \\\\textbf{T}ime\\n\\\\textbf{S}eries \\\\textbf{Causal} (\\\\verb+SPORTSCausal+), which enables the\\nestimation of treatment effects without relying on these stringent assumptions.\\nWe demonstrate the practical applicability of \\\\verb+SPORTSCausal+ through a\\nreal-world budget-control experiment. In this experiment, data was collected\\nfrom both a 5\\\\% live experiment and a 50\\\\% live experiment using the same\\ntreatment. Due to the spillover effect, the vanilla estimation of the treatment\\neffect was not robust across different treatment sizes, whereas\\n\\\\verb+SPORTSCausal+ provided a robust estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
SPORTSCausal: Spill-Over Time Series Causal Inference
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for
causal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic
studies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary
advantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to
significantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on
strong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group
randomness, which are not always feasible in real-world applications.
Traditional inferential methods, including analysis of covariance (ANCOVA),
often fail when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a
novel approach named \textbf{Sp}ill\textbf{o}ve\textbf{r} \textbf{T}ime
\textbf{S}eries \textbf{Causal} (\verb+SPORTSCausal+), which enables the
estimation of treatment effects without relying on these stringent assumptions.
We demonstrate the practical applicability of \verb+SPORTSCausal+ through a
real-world budget-control experiment. In this experiment, data was collected
from both a 5\% live experiment and a 50\% live experiment using the same
treatment. Due to the spillover effect, the vanilla estimation of the treatment
effect was not robust across different treatment sizes, whereas
\verb+SPORTSCausal+ provided a robust estimation.