不同权重初始化策略对植物病害检测迁移学习的影响

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Plant Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1111/ppa.13997
Duygu Sinanc Terzi
{"title":"不同权重初始化策略对植物病害检测迁移学习的影响","authors":"Duygu Sinanc Terzi","doi":"10.1111/ppa.13997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The weight initialization technique for transfer learning refers to the practice of using pretrained models that can be modified to solve new problems, instead of starting the training process from scratch. In this study, six different transfer learning weight initialization strategies were proposed for plant disease detection: scratch (i.e., random initialization), pretrained model on cross‐domain (ImageNet), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019) with cross‐domain (ImageNet) weights, model trained on same domain (PlantVillage), and model trained on same domain (PlantVillage) with cross‐domain weights (ImageNet). Weights from each strategy were transferred to a target dataset (Plant Pathology 2021). These strategies were implemented using eight deep learning architectures. It was observed that transferring from any strategy led to an average acceleration of convergence ranging from 33.88% to 73.16% in mean loss and an improvement of 8.72%–42.12% in mean F<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>‐score compared to the scratch strategy. Moreover, although smaller and less comprehensive than ImageNet, transferring information from the same domain or related domain proved to be competitive compared to transferring from ImageNet. This indicates that ImageNet, which is widely favoured in the literature, may not necessarily represent the most optimal transfer source for the given context. In addition, to identify which strategies have significant differences, a post hoc analysis using Tukey's HSD test was conducted. Finally, the classifications made by the proposed models were visualized using Grad‐CAM to provide a qualitative understanding of how different weight initialization strategies affect the focus areas of the models.","PeriodicalId":20075,"journal":{"name":"Plant Pathology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of different weight initialization strategies on transfer learning for plant disease detection\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Sinanc Terzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppa.13997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The weight initialization technique for transfer learning refers to the practice of using pretrained models that can be modified to solve new problems, instead of starting the training process from scratch. In this study, six different transfer learning weight initialization strategies were proposed for plant disease detection: scratch (i.e., random initialization), pretrained model on cross‐domain (ImageNet), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019) with cross‐domain (ImageNet) weights, model trained on same domain (PlantVillage), and model trained on same domain (PlantVillage) with cross‐domain weights (ImageNet). Weights from each strategy were transferred to a target dataset (Plant Pathology 2021). These strategies were implemented using eight deep learning architectures. It was observed that transferring from any strategy led to an average acceleration of convergence ranging from 33.88% to 73.16% in mean loss and an improvement of 8.72%–42.12% in mean F<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>‐score compared to the scratch strategy. Moreover, although smaller and less comprehensive than ImageNet, transferring information from the same domain or related domain proved to be competitive compared to transferring from ImageNet. This indicates that ImageNet, which is widely favoured in the literature, may not necessarily represent the most optimal transfer source for the given context. In addition, to identify which strategies have significant differences, a post hoc analysis using Tukey's HSD test was conducted. Finally, the classifications made by the proposed models were visualized using Grad‐CAM to provide a qualitative understanding of how different weight initialization strategies affect the focus areas of the models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Pathology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13997\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迁移学习的权重初始化技术是指使用可修改的预训练模型来解决新问题,而不是从头开始训练过程。在本研究中,针对植物病害检测提出了六种不同的迁移学习权重初始化策略:从零开始(即随机初始化)、在跨域(ImageNet)上预训练模型、在相关域(ISIC 2019)上训练模型、在相关域(ISIC 2019)上训练带有跨域(ImageNet)权重的模型、在同一域(PlantVillage)上训练模型,以及在同一域(PlantVillage)上训练带有跨域权重(ImageNet)的模型。每种策略的权重都被转移到目标数据集(Plant Pathology 2021)中。这些策略使用八种深度学习架构实现。据观察,与从零开始的策略相比,从任何策略转移都会导致平均收敛加速,平均损失率从 33.88% 到 73.16%,平均 F1 分数提高了 8.72% 到 42.12%。此外,尽管从同一领域或相关领域传输信息比从 ImageNet 传输信息更小、更不全面,但事实证明,从 ImageNet 传输信息具有竞争力。这表明,ImageNet 虽然在文献中广受青睐,但它并不一定是特定情况下的最佳传输源。此外,为了确定哪些策略存在显著差异,我们使用 Tukey's HSD 检验法进行了事后分析。最后,使用 Grad-CAM 对所提模型的分类进行了可视化,以提供对不同权重初始化策略如何影响模型重点领域的定性理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of different weight initialization strategies on transfer learning for plant disease detection
The weight initialization technique for transfer learning refers to the practice of using pretrained models that can be modified to solve new problems, instead of starting the training process from scratch. In this study, six different transfer learning weight initialization strategies were proposed for plant disease detection: scratch (i.e., random initialization), pretrained model on cross‐domain (ImageNet), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019) with cross‐domain (ImageNet) weights, model trained on same domain (PlantVillage), and model trained on same domain (PlantVillage) with cross‐domain weights (ImageNet). Weights from each strategy were transferred to a target dataset (Plant Pathology 2021). These strategies were implemented using eight deep learning architectures. It was observed that transferring from any strategy led to an average acceleration of convergence ranging from 33.88% to 73.16% in mean loss and an improvement of 8.72%–42.12% in mean F1‐score compared to the scratch strategy. Moreover, although smaller and less comprehensive than ImageNet, transferring information from the same domain or related domain proved to be competitive compared to transferring from ImageNet. This indicates that ImageNet, which is widely favoured in the literature, may not necessarily represent the most optimal transfer source for the given context. In addition, to identify which strategies have significant differences, a post hoc analysis using Tukey's HSD test was conducted. Finally, the classifications made by the proposed models were visualized using Grad‐CAM to provide a qualitative understanding of how different weight initialization strategies affect the focus areas of the models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Pathology
Plant Pathology 生物-农艺学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This international journal, owned and edited by the British Society for Plant Pathology, covers all aspects of plant pathology and reaches subscribers in 80 countries. Top quality original research papers and critical reviews from around the world cover: diseases of temperate and tropical plants caused by fungi, bacteria, viruses, phytoplasmas and nematodes; physiological, biochemical, molecular, ecological, genetic and economic aspects of plant pathology; disease epidemiology and modelling; disease appraisal and crop loss assessment; and plant disease control and disease-related crop management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信