{"title":"预算最大化股份分配问题","authors":"Bin Deng, Weidong Li","doi":"10.1007/s11590-024-02145-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We are given a set of indivisible goods and a set of <i>m</i> agents where each good has a size and each agent has an additive valuation function and a budget. The budgeted maximin share allocation problem is to find a feasible allocation such that the size of the bundle allocated to each agent does not exceed its budget, and the minimum ratio of the valuation and the maximin share (MMS) value of any agent is as large as possible, where the MMS value of each agent is that he can achieve by dividing the goods into <i>n</i> bundles, and receiving his least desirable bundle. In this paper, we prove the existence of <span>\\(\\frac{n}{3n-2}\\)</span>-approximate MMS allocation and give an instance which does not have a (<span>\\(\\frac{3}{4}+\\epsilon \\)</span>)-approximate MMS allocation, for any <span>\\(\\epsilon \\in (0,1)\\)</span>. Moreover, we provide a polynomial time algorithm to find an <span>\\(\\frac{1}{3}\\)</span>-MMS allocation, and prove that there is no <span>\\((\\frac{2}{3} + \\epsilon )\\)</span>-approximate algorithm in polynomial time unless <span>\\(\\mathcal{P}=\\mathcal{N}\\mathcal{P}\\)</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49720,"journal":{"name":"Optimization Letters","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The budgeted maximin share allocation problem\",\"authors\":\"Bin Deng, Weidong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11590-024-02145-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We are given a set of indivisible goods and a set of <i>m</i> agents where each good has a size and each agent has an additive valuation function and a budget. The budgeted maximin share allocation problem is to find a feasible allocation such that the size of the bundle allocated to each agent does not exceed its budget, and the minimum ratio of the valuation and the maximin share (MMS) value of any agent is as large as possible, where the MMS value of each agent is that he can achieve by dividing the goods into <i>n</i> bundles, and receiving his least desirable bundle. In this paper, we prove the existence of <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{n}{3n-2}\\\\)</span>-approximate MMS allocation and give an instance which does not have a (<span>\\\\(\\\\frac{3}{4}+\\\\epsilon \\\\)</span>)-approximate MMS allocation, for any <span>\\\\(\\\\epsilon \\\\in (0,1)\\\\)</span>. Moreover, we provide a polynomial time algorithm to find an <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{1}{3}\\\\)</span>-MMS allocation, and prove that there is no <span>\\\\((\\\\frac{2}{3} + \\\\epsilon )\\\\)</span>-approximate algorithm in polynomial time unless <span>\\\\(\\\\mathcal{P}=\\\\mathcal{N}\\\\mathcal{P}\\\\)</span>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optimization Letters\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optimization Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-024-02145-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimization Letters","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-024-02145-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们给定了一组不可分割的商品和一组 m 个代理人,其中每个商品都有一个大小,每个代理人都有一个加法估值函数和一个预算。预算最大化份额分配问题就是要找到一个可行的分配方案,使得分配给每个代理人的捆绑物的大小不超过其预算,并且任何代理人的估值和最大化份额(MMS)值的最小比率尽可能大,其中每个代理人的最大化份额值是他将货物分成 n 个捆绑物,并得到他最不想要的捆绑物所能达到的。在本文中,我们证明了 \(\frac{n}{3n-2}\)-approximate MMS allocation 的存在,并给出了一个对于任意 \(\epsilon \in (0,1)\),不存在 (\(\frac{3}{4}+\epsilon \))-approximate MMS allocation 的实例。此外,我们还提供了一种多项式时间算法来找到一个(\frac{1}{3}\)-MMS分配,并证明除非(\mathcal{P}=\mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\),否则不存在多项式时间内的((\frac{2}{3}+\epsilon )\)-近似算法。
We are given a set of indivisible goods and a set of m agents where each good has a size and each agent has an additive valuation function and a budget. The budgeted maximin share allocation problem is to find a feasible allocation such that the size of the bundle allocated to each agent does not exceed its budget, and the minimum ratio of the valuation and the maximin share (MMS) value of any agent is as large as possible, where the MMS value of each agent is that he can achieve by dividing the goods into n bundles, and receiving his least desirable bundle. In this paper, we prove the existence of \(\frac{n}{3n-2}\)-approximate MMS allocation and give an instance which does not have a (\(\frac{3}{4}+\epsilon \))-approximate MMS allocation, for any \(\epsilon \in (0,1)\). Moreover, we provide a polynomial time algorithm to find an \(\frac{1}{3}\)-MMS allocation, and prove that there is no \((\frac{2}{3} + \epsilon )\)-approximate algorithm in polynomial time unless \(\mathcal{P}=\mathcal{N}\mathcal{P}\).
期刊介绍:
Optimization Letters is an international journal covering all aspects of optimization, including theory, algorithms, computational studies, and applications, and providing an outlet for rapid publication of short communications in the field. Originality, significance, quality and clarity are the essential criteria for choosing the material to be published.
Optimization Letters has been expanding in all directions at an astonishing rate during the last few decades. New algorithmic and theoretical techniques have been developed, the diffusion into other disciplines has proceeded at a rapid pace, and our knowledge of all aspects of the field has grown even more profound. At the same time one of the most striking trends in optimization is the constantly increasing interdisciplinary nature of the field.
Optimization Letters aims to communicate in a timely fashion all recent developments in optimization with concise short articles (limited to a total of ten journal pages). Such concise articles will be easily accessible by readers working in any aspects of optimization and wish to be informed of recent developments.