急性腰痛治疗中的多模式镇痛方法:新型镇痛组合依托考昔/曲马多的 III 期研究

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Miguel A. Zuqui-Ramírez, Victor M. Belalcazar-López, Adelfia Urenda-Quezada, Alejandro González-Rebatu y González, José G. Sander-Padilla, Laura A. Lugo-Sánchez, Ileana C. Rodríguez-Vázquez, Kevin F. Rios-Brito, María M. Arguedas-Núñez, Emmanuel Canales-Vázquez, Jorge González-Canudas
{"title":"急性腰痛治疗中的多模式镇痛方法:新型镇痛组合依托考昔/曲马多的 III 期研究","authors":"Miguel A. Zuqui-Ramírez, Victor M. Belalcazar-López, Adelfia Urenda-Quezada, Alejandro González-Rebatu y González, José G. Sander-Padilla, Laura A. Lugo-Sánchez, Ileana C. Rodríguez-Vázquez, Kevin F. Rios-Brito, María M. Arguedas-Núñez, Emmanuel Canales-Vázquez, Jorge González-Canudas","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00653-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combinations (FDC): etoricoxib/tramadol compared to paracetamol/tramadol for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) in a 7-day treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a phase IIIb, prospective, randomized, and multicenter study in patients with acute LBP treated with etoricoxib 90 mg/tramadol 50 mg (one packet of granules diluted in 100 ml of water, once a day [QD], for 7 days) or paracetamol 975 mg/tramadol 112.5 mg (one tablet of 325 mg/37.5 mg, three times a day [TID], for 7 days) to assess the efficacy (in terms of pain and disability improvement) and safety.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib/tramadol QD (<i>n</i> = 61) or paracetamol/tramadol TID (<i>n</i> = 63). From the magnitude of change in pain evaluations, differences were observed between the treatment groups at 3 [<i>p</i> = 0.054, CI 95% − 0.648 (− 0.010 to 1.306)] and 5 days (<i>p</i> = 0.041). The proportion of patients with a 30% reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was statistically significant when comparing the treatment groups on the third day of follow-up [<i>p</i> = 0.008, CI 95% 0.241 (0.061–0.421)]. An improvement in LBP’s disability to perform activities of daily routine (Oswestry and Roland–Morris questionnaires) was observed in both treatment groups. A total of 79 adverse events (AEs) (38 [48.1%] with etoricoxib/tramadol and 41 [51.9%] with paracetamol/tramadol) were reported. The most frequent AEs were nausea (17.7%) and dizziness (16.4%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results show the clinical benefits of etoricoxib/tramadol FDC, such as the sparing effect of tramadol dose per day, early therapeutic response rate compared with paracetamol/tramadol; which translates into faster pain relief, better adherence, less tramadol drug dependency, and a reduction of related AEs incidence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04968158.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Analgesia Approach in Acute Low Back Pain Management: A Phase III Study of a Novel Analgesic Combination of Etoricoxib/Tramadol\",\"authors\":\"Miguel A. Zuqui-Ramírez, Victor M. Belalcazar-López, Adelfia Urenda-Quezada, Alejandro González-Rebatu y González, José G. Sander-Padilla, Laura A. Lugo-Sánchez, Ileana C. Rodríguez-Vázquez, Kevin F. Rios-Brito, María M. Arguedas-Núñez, Emmanuel Canales-Vázquez, Jorge González-Canudas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40122-024-00653-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combinations (FDC): etoricoxib/tramadol compared to paracetamol/tramadol for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) in a 7-day treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a phase IIIb, prospective, randomized, and multicenter study in patients with acute LBP treated with etoricoxib 90 mg/tramadol 50 mg (one packet of granules diluted in 100 ml of water, once a day [QD], for 7 days) or paracetamol 975 mg/tramadol 112.5 mg (one tablet of 325 mg/37.5 mg, three times a day [TID], for 7 days) to assess the efficacy (in terms of pain and disability improvement) and safety.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib/tramadol QD (<i>n</i> = 61) or paracetamol/tramadol TID (<i>n</i> = 63). From the magnitude of change in pain evaluations, differences were observed between the treatment groups at 3 [<i>p</i> = 0.054, CI 95% − 0.648 (− 0.010 to 1.306)] and 5 days (<i>p</i> = 0.041). The proportion of patients with a 30% reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was statistically significant when comparing the treatment groups on the third day of follow-up [<i>p</i> = 0.008, CI 95% 0.241 (0.061–0.421)]. An improvement in LBP’s disability to perform activities of daily routine (Oswestry and Roland–Morris questionnaires) was observed in both treatment groups. A total of 79 adverse events (AEs) (38 [48.1%] with etoricoxib/tramadol and 41 [51.9%] with paracetamol/tramadol) were reported. The most frequent AEs were nausea (17.7%) and dizziness (16.4%).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results show the clinical benefits of etoricoxib/tramadol FDC, such as the sparing effect of tramadol dose per day, early therapeutic response rate compared with paracetamol/tramadol; which translates into faster pain relief, better adherence, less tramadol drug dependency, and a reduction of related AEs incidence.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04968158.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00653-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00653-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言疼痛和残疾管理对于快速康复至关重要。将具有不同作用机制的镇痛药联合使用,能以更低的剂量缓解更大的疼痛,从而促进有效的多模式镇痛。本研究评估了两种固定剂量复方制剂(FDC):依托考昔/曲马多与扑热息痛/曲马多在治疗急性腰背痛(LBP)7天疗程中的疗效和安全性比较。方法我们对急性腰背痛患者进行了一项 IIIb 期、前瞻性、随机和多中心研究,使用依托考昔 90 毫克/曲马多 50 毫克(一包颗粒剂稀释在 100 毫升水中,每天一次 [QD],持续 7 天)或扑热息痛 975 毫克/曲马多 112.结果 124 名患者被随机分配接受依托考昔/曲马多 QD(61 人)或扑热息痛/曲马多 TID(63 人)治疗。从疼痛评估的变化幅度来看,治疗组之间在3天[p = 0.054,CI 95% - 0.648 (- 0.010 to 1.306)]和5天(p = 0.041)时存在差异。在随访第三天,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分降低 30% 的患者比例与治疗组相比具有统计学意义[p = 0.008,CI 95% 0.241 (0.061-0.421)]。两组患者的枸杞多糖症日常活动能力(Oswestry 和 Roland-Morris 问卷调查)均有所改善。共报告了79例不良反应(依托考昔/曲马多为38例[48.1%],扑热息痛/曲马多为41例[51.9%])。结论结果显示了依托考昔/曲马多 FDC 的临床益处,如与扑热息痛/曲马多相比,依托考昔/曲马多 FDC 可节省曲马多的每日用药量,提高早期治疗反应率;从而更快地缓解疼痛,提高依从性,减少对曲马多的药物依赖,并降低相关 AEs 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multimodal Analgesia Approach in Acute Low Back Pain Management: A Phase III Study of a Novel Analgesic Combination of Etoricoxib/Tramadol

Multimodal Analgesia Approach in Acute Low Back Pain Management: A Phase III Study of a Novel Analgesic Combination of Etoricoxib/Tramadol

Introduction

Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combinations (FDC): etoricoxib/tramadol compared to paracetamol/tramadol for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) in a 7-day treatment.

Methods

We conducted a phase IIIb, prospective, randomized, and multicenter study in patients with acute LBP treated with etoricoxib 90 mg/tramadol 50 mg (one packet of granules diluted in 100 ml of water, once a day [QD], for 7 days) or paracetamol 975 mg/tramadol 112.5 mg (one tablet of 325 mg/37.5 mg, three times a day [TID], for 7 days) to assess the efficacy (in terms of pain and disability improvement) and safety.

Results

One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib/tramadol QD (n = 61) or paracetamol/tramadol TID (n = 63). From the magnitude of change in pain evaluations, differences were observed between the treatment groups at 3 [p = 0.054, CI 95% − 0.648 (− 0.010 to 1.306)] and 5 days (p = 0.041). The proportion of patients with a 30% reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was statistically significant when comparing the treatment groups on the third day of follow-up [p = 0.008, CI 95% 0.241 (0.061–0.421)]. An improvement in LBP’s disability to perform activities of daily routine (Oswestry and Roland–Morris questionnaires) was observed in both treatment groups. A total of 79 adverse events (AEs) (38 [48.1%] with etoricoxib/tramadol and 41 [51.9%] with paracetamol/tramadol) were reported. The most frequent AEs were nausea (17.7%) and dizziness (16.4%).

Conclusions

The results show the clinical benefits of etoricoxib/tramadol FDC, such as the sparing effect of tramadol dose per day, early therapeutic response rate compared with paracetamol/tramadol; which translates into faster pain relief, better adherence, less tramadol drug dependency, and a reduction of related AEs incidence.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04968158.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信