Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim
{"title":"基因组对决:乳酸杆菌属和粘液酵母菌益生菌潜力的硅学比较","authors":"Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim","doi":"10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic Face-Off: An In Silico Comparison of the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila\",\"authors\":\"Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic Face-Off: An In Silico Comparison of the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila
Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.