Detri2match 概念框架：匹配食腐动物和食腐动物的特征，揭示分解过程中的消耗规则

IF 4.6 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Functional Ecology Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/1365-2435.14611

Théo Marchand, Antoine Lecerf, Pierre-Marc Brousseau, Matthieu Chauvat, Michael Danger, Estelle Forey, I. Tanya Handa, Mickael Hedde, Florence Maunoury-Danger, Mathieu Santonja, Benjamin Pey

引用次数: 0

摘要

从土壤到淡水生态系统，分解都可以看作是有机物与多种生物相互作用的结果。这种功能部分是由食腐动物驱动的，这些无脊椎动物以残渣为食，或捕食残渣上的相关微生物，它们对分解的贡献很大，但却极其多变。为了更好地理解和预测食腐动物与残余物之间成对的相互作用，我们提出了一个名为 "Detri2match "的概念框架，以研究食腐动物对残余物的消耗。在这里，我们重点研究了将植物残体破碎的食肉动物之间的相互作用。我们提出了一个新的食腐性食渣动物定义，即当动物的性状与其资源的性状充分匹配时，就会消耗植物残体，并通过五个交互作用面来消耗植物残体。这五个方面包括：（1）关于相遇的空间匹配规则；（2）关于摄取的生物力学匹配规则；（3）关于同化的消化匹配规则；（4）关于满足新陈代谢需求的能量匹配规则；以及（5）关于以适应的比例满足化学元素需求的营养匹配规则。这一框架的主要目标是指导未来的研究，通过确定食腐动物和食腐动物的相关相互作用面及其关键相关特征，建立被误解的食腐动物与食腐动物配对相互作用的通用规则。这项研究应针对整个分解过程中性状匹配约束的时间变化进行。在充分积累性状信息的基础上，Detri2match 框架还可以通过推断未经检验的成对食腐动物与残余物之间的相互作用来进行预测。我们还概述了该框架在概念、方法和分析方面面临的挑战。主要的挑战是在碎屑网络水平上扩展这些成对规则并测试其通用性，这将有助于更好地理解碎屑网络的功能及其对分解的贡献。在期刊博客上免费阅读本文的通俗摘要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

The Detri2match conceptual framework: Matching detritivore and detritus traits to unravel consumption rules in a context of decomposition

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Detri2match conceptual framework: Matching detritivore and detritus traits to unravel consumption rules in a context of decomposition

Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Functional Ecology 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

9.00

自引率

1.90%

发文量

243

审稿时长

4 months

期刊介绍： Functional Ecology publishes high-impact papers that enable a mechanistic understanding of ecological pattern and process from the organismic to the ecosystem scale. Because of the multifaceted nature of this challenge, papers can be based on a wide range of approaches. Thus, manuscripts may vary from physiological, genetics, life-history, and behavioural perspectives for organismal studies to community and biogeochemical studies when the goal is to understand ecosystem and larger scale ecological phenomena. We believe that the diverse nature of our journal is a strength, not a weakness, and we are open-minded about the variety of data, research approaches and types of studies that we publish. Certain key areas will continue to be emphasized: studies that integrate genomics with ecology, studies that examine how key aspects of physiology (e.g., stress) impact the ecology of animals and plants, or vice versa, and how evolution shapes interactions among function and ecological traits. Ecology has increasingly moved towards the realization that organismal traits and activities are vital for understanding community dynamics and ecosystem processes, particularly in response to the rapid global changes occurring in earth’s environment, and Functional Ecology aims to publish such integrative papers.