{"title":"伽利略的船和相对论原理","authors":"S. Murgueitio Ramírez","doi":"arxiv-2408.06439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely acknowledged that the Galilean Relativity Principle, according\nto which the laws of classical systems are the same in all inertial frames in\nrelative motion, has played an important role in the development of modern\nphysics. It is also commonly believed that this principle holds the key to\nanswering why, for example, we do not notice the orbital velocity of the Earth\nas we go about our day. And yet, I argue in this paper that the precise content\nof this principle is ambiguous: standard presentations fail to distinguish\nbetween two principles that are ultimately inequivalent, the \"External Galilean\nRelativity Principle\" (EGRP) and the \"Internal Galilean Relativity Principle\"\n(IGRP). I demonstrate that EGRP and IGRP play distinct roles in physics and\nthat many classical systems that satisfy IGRP fail to satisfy EGRP. I further\nshow that the Relativity Principle introduced by Einstein in 1905-which is not\nrestricted to classical systems-also leads to two inequivalent principles. I\nconclude by noting that the phenomenon originally captured by Galileo's famous\nship passage is much more general than contemporary discussions in the\nphilosophy of symmetries suggest.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Galileo's Ship and the Relativity Principle\",\"authors\":\"S. Murgueitio Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.06439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely acknowledged that the Galilean Relativity Principle, according\\nto which the laws of classical systems are the same in all inertial frames in\\nrelative motion, has played an important role in the development of modern\\nphysics. It is also commonly believed that this principle holds the key to\\nanswering why, for example, we do not notice the orbital velocity of the Earth\\nas we go about our day. And yet, I argue in this paper that the precise content\\nof this principle is ambiguous: standard presentations fail to distinguish\\nbetween two principles that are ultimately inequivalent, the \\\"External Galilean\\nRelativity Principle\\\" (EGRP) and the \\\"Internal Galilean Relativity Principle\\\"\\n(IGRP). I demonstrate that EGRP and IGRP play distinct roles in physics and\\nthat many classical systems that satisfy IGRP fail to satisfy EGRP. I further\\nshow that the Relativity Principle introduced by Einstein in 1905-which is not\\nrestricted to classical systems-also leads to two inequivalent principles. I\\nconclude by noting that the phenomenon originally captured by Galileo's famous\\nship passage is much more general than contemporary discussions in the\\nphilosophy of symmetries suggest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It is widely acknowledged that the Galilean Relativity Principle, according
to which the laws of classical systems are the same in all inertial frames in
relative motion, has played an important role in the development of modern
physics. It is also commonly believed that this principle holds the key to
answering why, for example, we do not notice the orbital velocity of the Earth
as we go about our day. And yet, I argue in this paper that the precise content
of this principle is ambiguous: standard presentations fail to distinguish
between two principles that are ultimately inequivalent, the "External Galilean
Relativity Principle" (EGRP) and the "Internal Galilean Relativity Principle"
(IGRP). I demonstrate that EGRP and IGRP play distinct roles in physics and
that many classical systems that satisfy IGRP fail to satisfy EGRP. I further
show that the Relativity Principle introduced by Einstein in 1905-which is not
restricted to classical systems-also leads to two inequivalent principles. I
conclude by noting that the phenomenon originally captured by Galileo's famous
ship passage is much more general than contemporary discussions in the
philosophy of symmetries suggest.