在为期多周的基于工程设计(ED)的物理入门实验任务中调查设计与科学的联系

Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Nikhil Borse, Amir Bralin, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, N. Sanjay Rebello
{"title":"在为期多周的基于工程设计(ED)的物理入门实验任务中调查设计与科学的联系","authors":"Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Nikhil Borse, Amir Bralin, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, N. Sanjay Rebello","doi":"arxiv-2409.08224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reform documents advocate for innovative pedagogical strategies to enhance\nstudent learning. A key innovation is the integration of science and\nengineering practices through Engineering Design (ED)-based physics laboratory\ntasks, where students tackle engineering design problems by applying physics\nprinciples. While this approach has its benefits, research shows that students\ndo not always effectively apply scientific concepts, but instead rely on\ntrial-and-error approaches, and end up gadgeteering their way to a solution.\nThis leads to what is commonly referred to as the \"design-science gap\" -- that\nstudents do not always consciously apply science concepts while solving a\ndesign problem. However, as obvious as the notion of a `gap' may appear, there\nseems to exist no consensus on the definitions of `design' and `science',\nfurther complicating the understanding of this `gap'. This qualitative study\naddresses the notion of the design-science gap by examining student-groups'\ndiscussions and written lab reports from a multi-week ED-based undergraduate\nintroductory physics laboratory task. Building on our earlier studies, we\ndeveloped and employed a nuanced, multi-layered coding scheme inspired by the\nGioia Framework to characterize `design thinking' and `science thinking'. We\ndiscuss how student-groups engage in various aspects of design and how they\napply concepts physics principles to solve the problem. In the process, we\ndemonstrate the interconnectedness of students' design thinking and science\nthinking. We advocate for the usage of the term ``design--science connection''\nas opposed to ``design--science gap'' to deepen both design and scientific\nthinking. Our findings offer valuable insights for educators in design-based\nscience education.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Design--Science Connection in a multi-week Engineering Design (ED)-based introductory physics laboratory task\",\"authors\":\"Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Nikhil Borse, Amir Bralin, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, N. Sanjay Rebello\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reform documents advocate for innovative pedagogical strategies to enhance\\nstudent learning. A key innovation is the integration of science and\\nengineering practices through Engineering Design (ED)-based physics laboratory\\ntasks, where students tackle engineering design problems by applying physics\\nprinciples. While this approach has its benefits, research shows that students\\ndo not always effectively apply scientific concepts, but instead rely on\\ntrial-and-error approaches, and end up gadgeteering their way to a solution.\\nThis leads to what is commonly referred to as the \\\"design-science gap\\\" -- that\\nstudents do not always consciously apply science concepts while solving a\\ndesign problem. However, as obvious as the notion of a `gap' may appear, there\\nseems to exist no consensus on the definitions of `design' and `science',\\nfurther complicating the understanding of this `gap'. This qualitative study\\naddresses the notion of the design-science gap by examining student-groups'\\ndiscussions and written lab reports from a multi-week ED-based undergraduate\\nintroductory physics laboratory task. Building on our earlier studies, we\\ndeveloped and employed a nuanced, multi-layered coding scheme inspired by the\\nGioia Framework to characterize `design thinking' and `science thinking'. We\\ndiscuss how student-groups engage in various aspects of design and how they\\napply concepts physics principles to solve the problem. In the process, we\\ndemonstrate the interconnectedness of students' design thinking and science\\nthinking. We advocate for the usage of the term ``design--science connection''\\nas opposed to ``design--science gap'' to deepen both design and scientific\\nthinking. Our findings offer valuable insights for educators in design-based\\nscience education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改革文件倡导创新的教学策略,以提高学生的学习效果。一项重要的创新是通过基于工程设计(ED)的物理实验任务,将科学与工程实践相结合,让学生通过应用物理原理来解决工程设计问题。虽然这种方法有其益处,但研究表明,学生并不总是能有效地应用科学概念,而是依赖于尝试和错误的方法,最终以小玩意儿的方式解决问题。这就导致了通常所说的 "设计-科学差距"--学生在解决设计问题时并不总是有意识地应用科学概念。然而,尽管 "鸿沟 "的概念似乎显而易见,但人们对 "设计 "和 "科学 "的定义似乎并没有达成共识,这使得对 "鸿沟 "的理解变得更加复杂。本定性研究通过考察学生小组的讨论和书面实验报告,探讨了设计与科学之间的差距这一概念。在先前研究的基础上,我们受吉奥亚框架(Gioia Framework)的启发,开发并采用了一种细致入微、多层次的编码方案来描述 "设计思维 "和 "科学思维"。我们讨论了学生小组如何参与设计的各个方面,以及他们如何应用物理概念和原理来解决问题。在此过程中,我们展示了学生的设计思维和科学思维之间的相互联系。我们提倡使用 "设计-科学联系 "一词,而不是 "设计-科学差距",以深化设计和科学思维。我们的研究结果为基于设计的科学教育工作者提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Design--Science Connection in a multi-week Engineering Design (ED)-based introductory physics laboratory task
Reform documents advocate for innovative pedagogical strategies to enhance student learning. A key innovation is the integration of science and engineering practices through Engineering Design (ED)-based physics laboratory tasks, where students tackle engineering design problems by applying physics principles. While this approach has its benefits, research shows that students do not always effectively apply scientific concepts, but instead rely on trial-and-error approaches, and end up gadgeteering their way to a solution. This leads to what is commonly referred to as the "design-science gap" -- that students do not always consciously apply science concepts while solving a design problem. However, as obvious as the notion of a `gap' may appear, there seems to exist no consensus on the definitions of `design' and `science', further complicating the understanding of this `gap'. This qualitative study addresses the notion of the design-science gap by examining student-groups' discussions and written lab reports from a multi-week ED-based undergraduate introductory physics laboratory task. Building on our earlier studies, we developed and employed a nuanced, multi-layered coding scheme inspired by the Gioia Framework to characterize `design thinking' and `science thinking'. We discuss how student-groups engage in various aspects of design and how they apply concepts physics principles to solve the problem. In the process, we demonstrate the interconnectedness of students' design thinking and science thinking. We advocate for the usage of the term ``design--science connection'' as opposed to ``design--science gap'' to deepen both design and scientific thinking. Our findings offer valuable insights for educators in design-based science education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信