{"title":"主动和被动盐沼泽:数值研究","authors":"Yiren Gou, Mian Liu","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Salt diapirs dominate the structure in many sedimentary basins and control the preservation and migration of hydrocarbon. The formation of salt diapirs generally falls into two endmember models: active (up-building) and passive (down-building) diapirism. In the active model, salt diapirs rise from salt buoyancy to pierce through the sedimentary overburden, whereas in the passive model, salt diapirs result from differential loading of sediments during deposition. These endmember models are mostly conceptual or kinematic, the mechanics of active and passive diapirism, and their relative roles and interactions in the formation of salt diapirs, remain uncertain. Here, we use two-dimensional high-resolution numerical models to investigate the primary factors and critical conditions for active and passive diapirism. Our results indicate that it is improper to use driving mechanisms to classify salt diapirs, because the buoyancy-driven active salt diapirism involves differential loading, while the passive diapirism requires salt buoyancy. The rise of salt diapirs is more sensitive to the effective viscosity of the overburden than to the salt viscosity. Stiff overburdens could prevent the rise of salt diapirs, but they could be pierced by salt diapirs if plastic yield of the overburden is allowed. During deposition, the coupled salt-sediment deformation, driven by both salt buoyancy and differential loading of sediments, can lead to various diapiric salt structures and minibasins. Regional tectonic stress generally promotes salt diapirism by enhancing strain weakening of salts and overburdens. We suggest that the classification of active and passive salt diapirism is an oversimplification in most cases. We propose a general model of the formation of salt diapirs that usually begins with dome initiation driven by salt buoyancy, followed by syndepositional down-building controlled by sedimentation and differential loading, and ends with canopy formation when sedimentation stops.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active and passive salt diapirs: a numerical study\",\"authors\":\"Yiren Gou, Mian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Salt diapirs dominate the structure in many sedimentary basins and control the preservation and migration of hydrocarbon. The formation of salt diapirs generally falls into two endmember models: active (up-building) and passive (down-building) diapirism. In the active model, salt diapirs rise from salt buoyancy to pierce through the sedimentary overburden, whereas in the passive model, salt diapirs result from differential loading of sediments during deposition. These endmember models are mostly conceptual or kinematic, the mechanics of active and passive diapirism, and their relative roles and interactions in the formation of salt diapirs, remain uncertain. Here, we use two-dimensional high-resolution numerical models to investigate the primary factors and critical conditions for active and passive diapirism. Our results indicate that it is improper to use driving mechanisms to classify salt diapirs, because the buoyancy-driven active salt diapirism involves differential loading, while the passive diapirism requires salt buoyancy. The rise of salt diapirs is more sensitive to the effective viscosity of the overburden than to the salt viscosity. Stiff overburdens could prevent the rise of salt diapirs, but they could be pierced by salt diapirs if plastic yield of the overburden is allowed. During deposition, the coupled salt-sediment deformation, driven by both salt buoyancy and differential loading of sediments, can lead to various diapiric salt structures and minibasins. Regional tectonic stress generally promotes salt diapirism by enhancing strain weakening of salts and overburdens. We suggest that the classification of active and passive salt diapirism is an oversimplification in most cases. We propose a general model of the formation of salt diapirs that usually begins with dome initiation driven by salt buoyancy, followed by syndepositional down-building controlled by sedimentation and differential loading, and ends with canopy formation when sedimentation stops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae284\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Active and passive salt diapirs: a numerical study
Summary Salt diapirs dominate the structure in many sedimentary basins and control the preservation and migration of hydrocarbon. The formation of salt diapirs generally falls into two endmember models: active (up-building) and passive (down-building) diapirism. In the active model, salt diapirs rise from salt buoyancy to pierce through the sedimentary overburden, whereas in the passive model, salt diapirs result from differential loading of sediments during deposition. These endmember models are mostly conceptual or kinematic, the mechanics of active and passive diapirism, and their relative roles and interactions in the formation of salt diapirs, remain uncertain. Here, we use two-dimensional high-resolution numerical models to investigate the primary factors and critical conditions for active and passive diapirism. Our results indicate that it is improper to use driving mechanisms to classify salt diapirs, because the buoyancy-driven active salt diapirism involves differential loading, while the passive diapirism requires salt buoyancy. The rise of salt diapirs is more sensitive to the effective viscosity of the overburden than to the salt viscosity. Stiff overburdens could prevent the rise of salt diapirs, but they could be pierced by salt diapirs if plastic yield of the overburden is allowed. During deposition, the coupled salt-sediment deformation, driven by both salt buoyancy and differential loading of sediments, can lead to various diapiric salt structures and minibasins. Regional tectonic stress generally promotes salt diapirism by enhancing strain weakening of salts and overburdens. We suggest that the classification of active and passive salt diapirism is an oversimplification in most cases. We propose a general model of the formation of salt diapirs that usually begins with dome initiation driven by salt buoyancy, followed by syndepositional down-building controlled by sedimentation and differential loading, and ends with canopy formation when sedimentation stops.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.