利用物理特征和机器学习对美国西部的小型地震、爆炸和塌方进行分类

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Keith D Koper, Relu Burlacu, Alysha D Armstrong, Robert B Herrmann
{"title":"利用物理特征和机器学习对美国西部的小型地震、爆炸和塌方进行分类","authors":"Keith D Koper, Relu Burlacu, Alysha D Armstrong, Robert B Herrmann","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Classifying the source type of small seismic events is a key task in seismology. A common goal is distinguishing tectonic earthquakes from explosions and human induced seismicity. To this end, we applied a spectral modeling workflow to Pg and Sg waves from ∼10,000 seismic events that occurred in or near Utah and were recorded by broadband seismometers in the western U.S. at distances of 10–300 km. The events were a mixture of tectonic earthquakes (EQ), industrial explosions (EX), and mining-induced seismicity (MIS, primarily collapses) and were mostly small (median magnitude of 1.34 MC). Our spectral modeling was successful for 54% of the events, resulting in a new catalog of M0 and fc values. We evaluated 13 physics-based features—including differential magnitudes, Pg/Sg spectral amplitude ratios, long-period/short-period spectral amplitude ratios, and spectral misfit—as source classifiers. We found that Φ ≡ log10(M0) + 3log10(fc) was the most effective individual feature for distinguishing EQ from EX and MIS sources because EQ spectra are relatively enriched in high frequencies. We selected five less correlated features that spanned the feature space and used a naïve Bayes approach to create a three-way classification model. The model had 97.5% accuracy when applied to an independent test dataset. Model performance deteriorated when more than six features were combined. We conclude that models developed with a few physics-based waveform features can classify small seismic events with performance comparable to high-dimensional deep-learning models. Simple models that rely on physics-based features require less training data and make more interpretable decisions than deep-learning models, though they may require higher signal-to-noise ratios.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying Small Earthquakes, Explosions, and Collapses in the Western United States Using Physics-Based Features and Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Keith D Koper, Relu Burlacu, Alysha D Armstrong, Robert B Herrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Classifying the source type of small seismic events is a key task in seismology. A common goal is distinguishing tectonic earthquakes from explosions and human induced seismicity. To this end, we applied a spectral modeling workflow to Pg and Sg waves from ∼10,000 seismic events that occurred in or near Utah and were recorded by broadband seismometers in the western U.S. at distances of 10–300 km. The events were a mixture of tectonic earthquakes (EQ), industrial explosions (EX), and mining-induced seismicity (MIS, primarily collapses) and were mostly small (median magnitude of 1.34 MC). Our spectral modeling was successful for 54% of the events, resulting in a new catalog of M0 and fc values. We evaluated 13 physics-based features—including differential magnitudes, Pg/Sg spectral amplitude ratios, long-period/short-period spectral amplitude ratios, and spectral misfit—as source classifiers. We found that Φ ≡ log10(M0) + 3log10(fc) was the most effective individual feature for distinguishing EQ from EX and MIS sources because EQ spectra are relatively enriched in high frequencies. We selected five less correlated features that spanned the feature space and used a naïve Bayes approach to create a three-way classification model. The model had 97.5% accuracy when applied to an independent test dataset. Model performance deteriorated when more than six features were combined. We conclude that models developed with a few physics-based waveform features can classify small seismic events with performance comparable to high-dimensional deep-learning models. Simple models that rely on physics-based features require less training data and make more interpretable decisions than deep-learning models, though they may require higher signal-to-noise ratios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 对小型地震事件的震源类型进行分类是地震学的一项关键任务。一个共同的目标是将构造地震与爆炸和人为地震区分开来。为此,我们对发生在犹他州或其附近、由美国西部距离 10-300 公里的宽带地震仪记录的 ∼10,000 次地震事件中的 Pg 波和 Sg 波应用了频谱建模工作流程。这些地震事件包括构造地震(EQ)、工业爆炸(EX)和采矿引发的地震(MIS,主要是塌陷),且大多规模较小(中值震级为 1.34 MC)。我们对 54% 的事件进行了成功的频谱建模,从而得到了新的 M0 和 fc 值目录。我们评估了 13 个基于物理学的特征--包括不同的震级、Pg/Sg 光谱振幅比、长周期/短周期光谱振幅比和光谱错配--作为源分类器。我们发现,Φ ≡ log10(M0) + 3log10(fc) 是区分 EQ 与 EX 和 MIS 来源最有效的单个特征,因为 EQ 光谱相对富含高频。我们选择了横跨特征空间的五个相关性较低的特征,并使用天真贝叶斯方法创建了一个三向分类模型。该模型应用于独立测试数据集时,准确率达到 97.5%。当组合的特征超过六个时,模型的性能就会下降。我们的结论是,利用少量基于物理的波形特征开发的模型可以对小型地震事件进行分类,其性能可与高维深度学习模型相媲美。与深度学习模型相比,依赖基于物理特征的简单模型需要的训练数据更少,做出的决定更易解释,尽管它们可能需要更高的信噪比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifying Small Earthquakes, Explosions, and Collapses in the Western United States Using Physics-Based Features and Machine Learning
Summary Classifying the source type of small seismic events is a key task in seismology. A common goal is distinguishing tectonic earthquakes from explosions and human induced seismicity. To this end, we applied a spectral modeling workflow to Pg and Sg waves from ∼10,000 seismic events that occurred in or near Utah and were recorded by broadband seismometers in the western U.S. at distances of 10–300 km. The events were a mixture of tectonic earthquakes (EQ), industrial explosions (EX), and mining-induced seismicity (MIS, primarily collapses) and were mostly small (median magnitude of 1.34 MC). Our spectral modeling was successful for 54% of the events, resulting in a new catalog of M0 and fc values. We evaluated 13 physics-based features—including differential magnitudes, Pg/Sg spectral amplitude ratios, long-period/short-period spectral amplitude ratios, and spectral misfit—as source classifiers. We found that Φ ≡ log10(M0) + 3log10(fc) was the most effective individual feature for distinguishing EQ from EX and MIS sources because EQ spectra are relatively enriched in high frequencies. We selected five less correlated features that spanned the feature space and used a naïve Bayes approach to create a three-way classification model. The model had 97.5% accuracy when applied to an independent test dataset. Model performance deteriorated when more than six features were combined. We conclude that models developed with a few physics-based waveform features can classify small seismic events with performance comparable to high-dimensional deep-learning models. Simple models that rely on physics-based features require less training data and make more interpretable decisions than deep-learning models, though they may require higher signal-to-noise ratios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信