印度-欧亚大陆碰撞西段喜马拉雅-喀喇昆仑-西藏地区的应力机制:基于焦点机制求解数据的应力场影响

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Vivek G Babu, Naresh Kumar, Sanjit Kumar Pal
{"title":"印度-欧亚大陆碰撞西段喜马拉雅-喀喇昆仑-西藏地区的应力机制:基于焦点机制求解数据的应力场影响","authors":"Vivek G Babu, Naresh Kumar, Sanjit Kumar Pal","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The stress regime patterns of high seismically active regions within the western part of the India-Eurasia collision, spanning from 67° E to 83° E and 27° N to 39° N, are elucidated through analysis of 684 Focal Mechanism Solutions from 1962 to 2021. Eighteen seismically active zones used for the stress tensor inversion, are defined based on the spatial extent of the seismicity, the depth distribution of seismic events, focal mechanism studies and seismotectonics of the region. The defined regimes are: (1) Sulaiman Ranges and Lobe Region, (2) Hindukush, (3) Pamir, (4) Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, (5) Hazara Syntaxis, (6) Kashmir-Zanskar region, (7) Kangra-Chamba, (8) Kinnaur and Kaurik-Chango Fault Zone (KCFZ), (9) Garhwal, (10) Kumaon, (11) Karakoram Fault Zone, and (12) Gozha-Ashikule Fault Zone. Seismicity is reported only in the crust or up to mid-crust in most of the regions, except for the Pamir and Hindukush, where the seismicity can be observed down to 160 km and 280 km, respectively. We report a clockwise rotation of the maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) of about 42° and 21° in the Hindukush and Pamir regions, respectively with increasing focal depths from NW to north. The region where major and strong earthquakes occur indicates pure compressive regimes. Most of the zones support transpressive and transtensional tectonics with a few zones by normal and strike-slip fault regimes. Regions like Nanga Parbat syntaxis, Kinnaur, KCFZ, and Zanskar are exceptions, where extensional and transformational tectonic features dominate. Plate convergence force has less effect on defining the stress regime in the KFZ and Gozha-Ashikule regions, which display transtensional and pure extensional regimes, respectively. Under-thrusting of the Indian plate through complex tectonics is indicated by dominant compression stresses with evidences of normal, strike-slip, and oblique fault mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":"386 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress regimes in the Himalaya-Karakoram-Tibet, the western part of India-Eurasia collision: stress field implications based on focal mechanism solution data\",\"authors\":\"Vivek G Babu, Naresh Kumar, Sanjit Kumar Pal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The stress regime patterns of high seismically active regions within the western part of the India-Eurasia collision, spanning from 67° E to 83° E and 27° N to 39° N, are elucidated through analysis of 684 Focal Mechanism Solutions from 1962 to 2021. Eighteen seismically active zones used for the stress tensor inversion, are defined based on the spatial extent of the seismicity, the depth distribution of seismic events, focal mechanism studies and seismotectonics of the region. The defined regimes are: (1) Sulaiman Ranges and Lobe Region, (2) Hindukush, (3) Pamir, (4) Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, (5) Hazara Syntaxis, (6) Kashmir-Zanskar region, (7) Kangra-Chamba, (8) Kinnaur and Kaurik-Chango Fault Zone (KCFZ), (9) Garhwal, (10) Kumaon, (11) Karakoram Fault Zone, and (12) Gozha-Ashikule Fault Zone. Seismicity is reported only in the crust or up to mid-crust in most of the regions, except for the Pamir and Hindukush, where the seismicity can be observed down to 160 km and 280 km, respectively. We report a clockwise rotation of the maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) of about 42° and 21° in the Hindukush and Pamir regions, respectively with increasing focal depths from NW to north. The region where major and strong earthquakes occur indicates pure compressive regimes. Most of the zones support transpressive and transtensional tectonics with a few zones by normal and strike-slip fault regimes. Regions like Nanga Parbat syntaxis, Kinnaur, KCFZ, and Zanskar are exceptions, where extensional and transformational tectonic features dominate. Plate convergence force has less effect on defining the stress regime in the KFZ and Gozha-Ashikule regions, which display transtensional and pure extensional regimes, respectively. Under-thrusting of the Indian plate through complex tectonics is indicated by dominant compression stresses with evidences of normal, strike-slip, and oblique fault mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":\"386 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 通过分析 1962 年至 2021 年期间的 684 个焦点机制解决方案,阐明了印度-欧亚大陆碰撞西部地区(东经 67 度至 83 度,北纬 27 度至 39 度)地震活动频繁区的应力机制模式。根据该地区地震活动的空间范围、地震事件的深度分布、焦点机制研究和地震构造,定义了用于应力张量反演的 18 个地震活动区。界定的地震带为(1) 苏莱曼山脉和裂片地区,(2) 兴都库什山脉,(3) 帕米尔地区,(4) 南迦帕尔巴特综合地震带,(5) 哈扎拉综合地震带,(6) 克什米尔-赞斯卡尔地区、(7) 康格拉-尚巴(Kangra-Chamba),(8) 金瑙尔(Kinnaur)和考瑞克-昌戈断裂带(KCFZ),(9) 加瓦尔(Garhwal),(10) 库蒙(Kumaon),(11) 卡拉科拉姆断裂带,以及 (12) 戈扎-阿什库勒断裂带。除帕米尔高原和兴都库什山脉可分别观测到低至 160 千米和 280 千米的地震外,大多数地区的地震只发生在地壳或地壳中层。我们报告说,随着震源深度从西北向北增加,兴都库什和帕米尔地区的最大水平应力(SHmax)分别顺时针旋转了约 42° 和 21°。发生大地震和强震的地区显示为纯压缩性地震区。大部分地区支持换位和转位构造,少数地区为正断层和走向滑动断层构造。南迦帕尔巴特综合区、金瑙尔、KCFZ 和赞斯卡尔等地区是例外,这些地区的伸展和转换构造特征占主导地位。在 KFZ 和 Gozha-Ashikule 地区,板块辐合力对确定应力机制的影响较小,这两个地区分别显示了过渡伸展和纯伸展机制。印度板块通过复杂的构造作用产生的下推作用表现为主要的压缩应力,并有正断层、走向滑动断层和斜断层机制的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress regimes in the Himalaya-Karakoram-Tibet, the western part of India-Eurasia collision: stress field implications based on focal mechanism solution data
Summary The stress regime patterns of high seismically active regions within the western part of the India-Eurasia collision, spanning from 67° E to 83° E and 27° N to 39° N, are elucidated through analysis of 684 Focal Mechanism Solutions from 1962 to 2021. Eighteen seismically active zones used for the stress tensor inversion, are defined based on the spatial extent of the seismicity, the depth distribution of seismic events, focal mechanism studies and seismotectonics of the region. The defined regimes are: (1) Sulaiman Ranges and Lobe Region, (2) Hindukush, (3) Pamir, (4) Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, (5) Hazara Syntaxis, (6) Kashmir-Zanskar region, (7) Kangra-Chamba, (8) Kinnaur and Kaurik-Chango Fault Zone (KCFZ), (9) Garhwal, (10) Kumaon, (11) Karakoram Fault Zone, and (12) Gozha-Ashikule Fault Zone. Seismicity is reported only in the crust or up to mid-crust in most of the regions, except for the Pamir and Hindukush, where the seismicity can be observed down to 160 km and 280 km, respectively. We report a clockwise rotation of the maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) of about 42° and 21° in the Hindukush and Pamir regions, respectively with increasing focal depths from NW to north. The region where major and strong earthquakes occur indicates pure compressive regimes. Most of the zones support transpressive and transtensional tectonics with a few zones by normal and strike-slip fault regimes. Regions like Nanga Parbat syntaxis, Kinnaur, KCFZ, and Zanskar are exceptions, where extensional and transformational tectonic features dominate. Plate convergence force has less effect on defining the stress regime in the KFZ and Gozha-Ashikule regions, which display transtensional and pure extensional regimes, respectively. Under-thrusting of the Indian plate through complex tectonics is indicated by dominant compression stresses with evidences of normal, strike-slip, and oblique fault mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信