关于护士对痴呆症患者使用化学约束手段的看法以及对非药物疗法的障碍的结构化文献综述

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jeremy Jacobs, Li Wei, Susan Slatyer
{"title":"关于护士对痴呆症患者使用化学约束手段的看法以及对非药物疗法的障碍的结构化文献综述","authors":"Jeremy Jacobs, Li Wei, Susan Slatyer","doi":"10.1177/21582440241267143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to critically analyse current literature that explores nurses’ perspectives concerning the use of chemical restraints amongst people with dementia—regarding behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)—to consolidate existing knowledge on this phenomenon and generate a foundation for further research. This literature review followed the 12-step approach by Kable et al. A total of 17 articles published between 2012 and 2022 were included following critical appraisal. A total of 2,806 participants, primarily consisting of nurses of various levels (44%) were included amongst the 17 included articles. Five themes emerged from the analysis of the findings: (a) nurses’ perceptions of BPSD, (b) perceived effectiveness and safety of chemical restraints, (c) influence of the practice environment, (d) perceptions of non-pharmacological approaches (NPA)s, and (e) barriers to using NPAs. Explicit and implicit pressures to prescribe and utilize chemical restraints exerted by nurses and families promote the use of chemical restraints, amplified by barriers to using alternative approaches. A tentative conceptual model was proposed to explain these emergent concepts and relationships between the themes.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Structured Literature Review of Nurses’ Perceptions Concerning the Use of Chemical Restraints Amongst People with Dementia and the Perceived Barriers to Non-Pharmacological Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Jacobs, Li Wei, Susan Slatyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21582440241267143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to critically analyse current literature that explores nurses’ perspectives concerning the use of chemical restraints amongst people with dementia—regarding behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)—to consolidate existing knowledge on this phenomenon and generate a foundation for further research. This literature review followed the 12-step approach by Kable et al. A total of 17 articles published between 2012 and 2022 were included following critical appraisal. A total of 2,806 participants, primarily consisting of nurses of various levels (44%) were included amongst the 17 included articles. Five themes emerged from the analysis of the findings: (a) nurses’ perceptions of BPSD, (b) perceived effectiveness and safety of chemical restraints, (c) influence of the practice environment, (d) perceptions of non-pharmacological approaches (NPA)s, and (e) barriers to using NPAs. Explicit and implicit pressures to prescribe and utilize chemical restraints exerted by nurses and families promote the use of chemical restraints, amplified by barriers to using alternative approaches. A tentative conceptual model was proposed to explain these emergent concepts and relationships between the themes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sage Open\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sage Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241267143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241267143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在批判性地分析目前探讨护士对痴呆症患者使用化学约束--关于痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)--的观点的文献,以巩固有关这一现象的现有知识,并为进一步研究奠定基础。本次文献综述采用了 Kable 等人的 12 步方法。经过严格评审,共纳入了 17 篇 2012 年至 2022 年间发表的文章。在这 17 篇文章中,共有 2 806 名参与者,主要包括不同级别的护士(44%)。对研究结果的分析得出了五个主题:(a) 护士对 BPSD 的看法;(b) 对化学约束的有效性和安全性的看法;(c) 实践环境的影响;(d) 对非药物治疗方法 (NPA) 的看法;(e) 使用 NPA 的障碍。护士和家属对开具和使用化学约束处方施加的显性和隐性压力促进了化学约束的使用,而使用替代方法的障碍又放大了这种压力。我们提出了一个初步概念模型来解释这些新出现的概念和主题之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Structured Literature Review of Nurses’ Perceptions Concerning the Use of Chemical Restraints Amongst People with Dementia and the Perceived Barriers to Non-Pharmacological Approaches
This article aims to critically analyse current literature that explores nurses’ perspectives concerning the use of chemical restraints amongst people with dementia—regarding behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)—to consolidate existing knowledge on this phenomenon and generate a foundation for further research. This literature review followed the 12-step approach by Kable et al. A total of 17 articles published between 2012 and 2022 were included following critical appraisal. A total of 2,806 participants, primarily consisting of nurses of various levels (44%) were included amongst the 17 included articles. Five themes emerged from the analysis of the findings: (a) nurses’ perceptions of BPSD, (b) perceived effectiveness and safety of chemical restraints, (c) influence of the practice environment, (d) perceptions of non-pharmacological approaches (NPA)s, and (e) barriers to using NPAs. Explicit and implicit pressures to prescribe and utilize chemical restraints exerted by nurses and families promote the use of chemical restraints, amplified by barriers to using alternative approaches. A tentative conceptual model was proposed to explain these emergent concepts and relationships between the themes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信