教师和学生对通用学习设计框架的看法:范围审查

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Chen Han, Jianghua Lei
{"title":"教师和学生对通用学习设计框架的看法:范围审查","authors":"Chen Han, Jianghua Lei","doi":"10.1177/21582440241272032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, promoting inclusive education has become the central initiative for governments worldwide. The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework has been developed to address students’ differences and meet their learning needs. Although some literature has examined the effectiveness of the UDL framework in teaching practices, little research has explored teachers’ and students’ beliefs toward the UDL framework. This study used a scoping review methodology to locate previous studies about teachers’ and students’ beliefs regarding the UDL framework published in peer-reviewed journals in the past 10 years (2014–2023). The data analysis conceptualized three themes and indicated that most teachers and students held positive beliefs toward the UDL framework and thought that the UDL framework could support inclusive practices. However, some barriers, such as teachers’ misconceptions, inflexible curriculum, and inadequate professionals, influenced teachers’ implementation of the UDL framework. The implications for future research and the recommendations for teachers’ practices and professional development are also provided.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs Towards Universal Design for Learning Framework: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Chen Han, Jianghua Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21582440241272032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, promoting inclusive education has become the central initiative for governments worldwide. The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework has been developed to address students’ differences and meet their learning needs. Although some literature has examined the effectiveness of the UDL framework in teaching practices, little research has explored teachers’ and students’ beliefs toward the UDL framework. This study used a scoping review methodology to locate previous studies about teachers’ and students’ beliefs regarding the UDL framework published in peer-reviewed journals in the past 10 years (2014–2023). The data analysis conceptualized three themes and indicated that most teachers and students held positive beliefs toward the UDL framework and thought that the UDL framework could support inclusive practices. However, some barriers, such as teachers’ misconceptions, inflexible curriculum, and inadequate professionals, influenced teachers’ implementation of the UDL framework. The implications for future research and the recommendations for teachers’ practices and professional development are also provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sage Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sage Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241272032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241272032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近来,促进全纳教育已成为世界各国政府的中心工作。通用学习设计(UDL)框架就是为了解决学生的差异和满足他们的学习需求而制定的。虽然有些文献探讨了通用学习设计框架在教学实践中的有效性,但很少有研究探讨教师和学生对通用学习设计框架的看法。本研究采用范围综述法,查找了过去 10 年(2014-2023 年)发表在同行评审期刊上的关于教师和学生对 UDL 框架的信念的研究。数据分析归纳出了三个主题,表明大多数教师和学生对 UDL 框架持有积极的信念,认为 UDL 框架能够支持全纳实践。然而,一些障碍,如教师的误解、课程设置不灵活、专业人员不足等,影响了教师对 UDL 框架的实施。本报告还提供了对未来研究的启示以及对教师实践和专业发展的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs Towards Universal Design for Learning Framework: A Scoping Review
Recently, promoting inclusive education has become the central initiative for governments worldwide. The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework has been developed to address students’ differences and meet their learning needs. Although some literature has examined the effectiveness of the UDL framework in teaching practices, little research has explored teachers’ and students’ beliefs toward the UDL framework. This study used a scoping review methodology to locate previous studies about teachers’ and students’ beliefs regarding the UDL framework published in peer-reviewed journals in the past 10 years (2014–2023). The data analysis conceptualized three themes and indicated that most teachers and students held positive beliefs toward the UDL framework and thought that the UDL framework could support inclusive practices. However, some barriers, such as teachers’ misconceptions, inflexible curriculum, and inadequate professionals, influenced teachers’ implementation of the UDL framework. The implications for future research and the recommendations for teachers’ practices and professional development are also provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信