Amos Nnaemeka Amedu, Samuel Agozie Ezeudu, Njideka Dorathy Eneogu
{"title":"讲师的反馈、学生的心理变量与学生对经济学的投入:学生性别的调节作用","authors":"Amos Nnaemeka Amedu, Samuel Agozie Ezeudu, Njideka Dorathy Eneogu","doi":"10.1177/21582440241271157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study modelled the influence of lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables on students’ engagement as moderated by students’ gender. The data were collected from 400 students who responded to feedback, self-efficacy, motivation, interest, and engagement questionnaires. Path diagrams and path coefficients were used to answer research questions. Hypotheses were tested with the average path coefficient (APC), average R-squared (ARS), and average adjusted R-squared (AARS). This study found that the causal model for explaining students’ engagement is a recursive model involving lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables. The study found that the composite effects of lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables explained 69% of the variation in students’ engagement in learning economics. In addition, this study revealed that the most significant variable that affected students’ engagement in this model was self-efficacy, followed by interest and motivation. In addition, lecturers’ feedback positively and significantly affected all psychological variables as well as students’ engagement in this model. Finally, the moderating effect of gender was not significant with respect to students’ engagement. Based on this study’s findings, lecturers should consider students’ psychological variables when providing feedback. Also, seminars and workshops should be organized for economics lecturers to improve feedback quality.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lecturers’ Feedback, Students’ Psychology Variables and Students’ Engagement in Economics: The Moderating Role of Students’ Gender\",\"authors\":\"Amos Nnaemeka Amedu, Samuel Agozie Ezeudu, Njideka Dorathy Eneogu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21582440241271157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study modelled the influence of lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables on students’ engagement as moderated by students’ gender. The data were collected from 400 students who responded to feedback, self-efficacy, motivation, interest, and engagement questionnaires. Path diagrams and path coefficients were used to answer research questions. Hypotheses were tested with the average path coefficient (APC), average R-squared (ARS), and average adjusted R-squared (AARS). This study found that the causal model for explaining students’ engagement is a recursive model involving lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables. The study found that the composite effects of lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables explained 69% of the variation in students’ engagement in learning economics. In addition, this study revealed that the most significant variable that affected students’ engagement in this model was self-efficacy, followed by interest and motivation. In addition, lecturers’ feedback positively and significantly affected all psychological variables as well as students’ engagement in this model. Finally, the moderating effect of gender was not significant with respect to students’ engagement. Based on this study’s findings, lecturers should consider students’ psychological variables when providing feedback. Also, seminars and workshops should be organized for economics lecturers to improve feedback quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sage Open\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sage Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究模拟了讲师的反馈和学生的心理变量对学生参与度的影响,并通过学生的性别进行调节。数据收集自 400 名学生,他们回答了反馈、自我效能感、动机、兴趣和参与度问卷。研究使用路径图和路径系数来回答研究问题。使用平均路径系数(APC)、平均 R 平方(ARS)和平均调整 R 平方(AARS)对假设进行了检验。本研究发现,解释学生参与度的因果模型是一个涉及讲师反馈和学生心理变量的递归模型。研究发现,讲师反馈和学生心理变量的综合效应解释了学生参与经济学学习的 69% 的变化。此外,该研究还发现,在这一模型中,对学生参与度影响最大的变量是自我效能感,其次是兴趣和动机。此外,在这一模型中,讲师的反馈对所有心理变量以及学生的参与度都有积极而显著的影响。最后,性别对学生参与度的调节作用并不显著。根据本研究的结果,讲师在提供反馈时应考虑学生的心理变量。此外,还应为经济学讲师组织研讨会和工作坊,以提高反馈质量。
Lecturers’ Feedback, Students’ Psychology Variables and Students’ Engagement in Economics: The Moderating Role of Students’ Gender
This study modelled the influence of lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables on students’ engagement as moderated by students’ gender. The data were collected from 400 students who responded to feedback, self-efficacy, motivation, interest, and engagement questionnaires. Path diagrams and path coefficients were used to answer research questions. Hypotheses were tested with the average path coefficient (APC), average R-squared (ARS), and average adjusted R-squared (AARS). This study found that the causal model for explaining students’ engagement is a recursive model involving lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables. The study found that the composite effects of lecturers’ feedback and students’ psychological variables explained 69% of the variation in students’ engagement in learning economics. In addition, this study revealed that the most significant variable that affected students’ engagement in this model was self-efficacy, followed by interest and motivation. In addition, lecturers’ feedback positively and significantly affected all psychological variables as well as students’ engagement in this model. Finally, the moderating effect of gender was not significant with respect to students’ engagement. Based on this study’s findings, lecturers should consider students’ psychological variables when providing feedback. Also, seminars and workshops should be organized for economics lecturers to improve feedback quality.