Carissa M. Long, Yi‐Jiun Jean Tsai, Gonzalo C. Castillo, Tien‐Chieh Hung, Vanessa D. Tobias, Evan W. Carson
{"title":"评估可见植入弹性体(VIE)标签在补充濒危河口鱼类中的应用","authors":"Carissa M. Long, Yi‐Jiun Jean Tsai, Gonzalo C. Castillo, Tien‐Chieh Hung, Vanessa D. Tobias, Evan W. Carson","doi":"10.1002/nafm.11024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveDelta Smelt <jats:italic>Hypomesus transpacificus</jats:italic> are thought to be close to extinction in the wild, which has spurred multiagency conservation efforts to supplement their population. In conjunction with these recent efforts, monitoring is needed to assess the effectiveness of supplementation. Such monitoring often uses large‐scale tagging of released fish to distinguish between hatchery‐origin and wild‐origin fish that are captured during later surveys.MethodsIn this study, we evaluated the use of visible implant elastomer tags in Delta Smelt to determine whether fish survival, fish growth, or tag retention were dependent on (1) tag color (blue, green, orange, red, yellow, and no‐tag control) or (2) tagged body location (posterior‐dorsal, anterior‐dorsal, mid‐lateral line, and no‐tag control).ResultOver 165 days of the first experiment, there was no difference in growth rate (mean = 0.073 mm/d, range = 0.072–0.075 mm/d) or survival (mean = 68%, range = 63–77%) among tag colors. Across all color groups, mean tag retention was 96% (range = 87–100%). Over 120 days of the second experiment, tag location had no influence on fish growth rate (mean = 0.064 mm/d, range = 0.062–0.067 mm/d) or survival (mean = 50%, range = 43–58%). For the surviving fish in experiment 2, the tags that were placed at the mid‐lateral line were retained less (84% on day 120) than those at posterior‐dorsal and anterior‐dorsal locations (99% and 98%, respectively).ConclusionOur results suggest that visible implant elastomer tagging is a suitable method for marking adult Delta Smelt (>50 mm fork length) for up to 165 days and can be useful for conservation monitoring efforts.","PeriodicalId":19263,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags for use in supplementation of an endangered estuarine fish\",\"authors\":\"Carissa M. Long, Yi‐Jiun Jean Tsai, Gonzalo C. Castillo, Tien‐Chieh Hung, Vanessa D. Tobias, Evan W. Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nafm.11024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveDelta Smelt <jats:italic>Hypomesus transpacificus</jats:italic> are thought to be close to extinction in the wild, which has spurred multiagency conservation efforts to supplement their population. In conjunction with these recent efforts, monitoring is needed to assess the effectiveness of supplementation. Such monitoring often uses large‐scale tagging of released fish to distinguish between hatchery‐origin and wild‐origin fish that are captured during later surveys.MethodsIn this study, we evaluated the use of visible implant elastomer tags in Delta Smelt to determine whether fish survival, fish growth, or tag retention were dependent on (1) tag color (blue, green, orange, red, yellow, and no‐tag control) or (2) tagged body location (posterior‐dorsal, anterior‐dorsal, mid‐lateral line, and no‐tag control).ResultOver 165 days of the first experiment, there was no difference in growth rate (mean = 0.073 mm/d, range = 0.072–0.075 mm/d) or survival (mean = 68%, range = 63–77%) among tag colors. Across all color groups, mean tag retention was 96% (range = 87–100%). Over 120 days of the second experiment, tag location had no influence on fish growth rate (mean = 0.064 mm/d, range = 0.062–0.067 mm/d) or survival (mean = 50%, range = 43–58%). For the surviving fish in experiment 2, the tags that were placed at the mid‐lateral line were retained less (84% on day 120) than those at posterior‐dorsal and anterior‐dorsal locations (99% and 98%, respectively).ConclusionOur results suggest that visible implant elastomer tagging is a suitable method for marking adult Delta Smelt (>50 mm fork length) for up to 165 days and can be useful for conservation monitoring efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Fisheries Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Fisheries Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags for use in supplementation of an endangered estuarine fish
ObjectiveDelta Smelt Hypomesus transpacificus are thought to be close to extinction in the wild, which has spurred multiagency conservation efforts to supplement their population. In conjunction with these recent efforts, monitoring is needed to assess the effectiveness of supplementation. Such monitoring often uses large‐scale tagging of released fish to distinguish between hatchery‐origin and wild‐origin fish that are captured during later surveys.MethodsIn this study, we evaluated the use of visible implant elastomer tags in Delta Smelt to determine whether fish survival, fish growth, or tag retention were dependent on (1) tag color (blue, green, orange, red, yellow, and no‐tag control) or (2) tagged body location (posterior‐dorsal, anterior‐dorsal, mid‐lateral line, and no‐tag control).ResultOver 165 days of the first experiment, there was no difference in growth rate (mean = 0.073 mm/d, range = 0.072–0.075 mm/d) or survival (mean = 68%, range = 63–77%) among tag colors. Across all color groups, mean tag retention was 96% (range = 87–100%). Over 120 days of the second experiment, tag location had no influence on fish growth rate (mean = 0.064 mm/d, range = 0.062–0.067 mm/d) or survival (mean = 50%, range = 43–58%). For the surviving fish in experiment 2, the tags that were placed at the mid‐lateral line were retained less (84% on day 120) than those at posterior‐dorsal and anterior‐dorsal locations (99% and 98%, respectively).ConclusionOur results suggest that visible implant elastomer tagging is a suitable method for marking adult Delta Smelt (>50 mm fork length) for up to 165 days and can be useful for conservation monitoring efforts.
期刊介绍:
The North American Journal of Fisheries Management promotes communication among fishery managers with an emphasis on North America, and addresses the maintenance, enhancement, and allocation of fisheries resources. It chronicles the development of practical monitoring and management programs for finfish and exploitable shellfish in marine and freshwater environments.
Contributions relate to the management of fish populations, habitats, and users to protect and enhance fish and fishery resources for societal benefits. Case histories of successes, failures, and effects of fisheries programs help convey practical management experience to others.