练习正念可以在经历负面影响后促进监测和接受

Stress & Health Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/smi.3474
Mario Wenzel, David Schumacher, Zarah Rowland
{"title":"练习正念可以在经历负面影响后促进监测和接受","authors":"Mario Wenzel, David Schumacher, Zarah Rowland","doi":"10.1002/smi.3474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although being mindful, that is, monitoring and accepting one's present feelings, has been shown to be associated with less current negative affect than distraction, acceptance is less endorsed after experiencing negative affect. Thus, acceptance, although effective, may not be endorsed when it is most needed, leading people to endorse other strategies such as distraction instead. In the present study, we examined whether a monitoring and acceptance induction in a laboratory setting (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 258) and a monitoring and acceptance training in daily life (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 125) increased acceptance (Study 1) and monitoring (Study 2) after experiencing negative affect. We found this to be the case: While participants in the control condition showed a significant negative association between prior negative affect and subsequent monitoring and acceptance, participants in the monitor and acceptance condition did not. Thus, even brief monitor and acceptance training is well suited to increasing the likelihood that individuals can monitor and accept their thoughts and feelings when confronted with strong emotions.","PeriodicalId":501682,"journal":{"name":"Stress & Health","volume":"9 1","pages":"e3474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practicing mindfulness can foster monitoring and acceptance after experiencing negative affect\",\"authors\":\"Mario Wenzel, David Schumacher, Zarah Rowland\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smi.3474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although being mindful, that is, monitoring and accepting one's present feelings, has been shown to be associated with less current negative affect than distraction, acceptance is less endorsed after experiencing negative affect. Thus, acceptance, although effective, may not be endorsed when it is most needed, leading people to endorse other strategies such as distraction instead. In the present study, we examined whether a monitoring and acceptance induction in a laboratory setting (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 258) and a monitoring and acceptance training in daily life (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 125) increased acceptance (Study 1) and monitoring (Study 2) after experiencing negative affect. We found this to be the case: While participants in the control condition showed a significant negative association between prior negative affect and subsequent monitoring and acceptance, participants in the monitor and acceptance condition did not. Thus, even brief monitor and acceptance training is well suited to increasing the likelihood that individuals can monitor and accept their thoughts and feelings when confronted with strong emotions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress & Health\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e3474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管与分散注意力相比,正念,即监测和接受自己当下的感受,与减少当下的负面情绪有关,但在经历负面情绪后,接受的认可度较低。因此,接受虽然有效,但可能在最需要的时候得不到认可,导致人们转而认可其他策略,如转移注意力。在本研究中,我们考察了在实验室环境中进行的监控和接纳诱导(258 人)和在日常生活中进行的监控和接纳训练(125 人)是否会提高人们在经历负面情绪后的接纳程度(研究 1)和监控程度(研究 2)。我们发现情况确实如此:对照组的参与者在之前的负面情绪与之后的监控和接纳之间表现出显著的负相关,而监控和接纳组的参与者则没有。因此,即使是简短的监控和接纳训练也能很好地提高个人在面对强烈情绪时监控和接纳自己的想法和感受的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practicing mindfulness can foster monitoring and acceptance after experiencing negative affect
Although being mindful, that is, monitoring and accepting one's present feelings, has been shown to be associated with less current negative affect than distraction, acceptance is less endorsed after experiencing negative affect. Thus, acceptance, although effective, may not be endorsed when it is most needed, leading people to endorse other strategies such as distraction instead. In the present study, we examined whether a monitoring and acceptance induction in a laboratory setting (N = 258) and a monitoring and acceptance training in daily life (N = 125) increased acceptance (Study 1) and monitoring (Study 2) after experiencing negative affect. We found this to be the case: While participants in the control condition showed a significant negative association between prior negative affect and subsequent monitoring and acceptance, participants in the monitor and acceptance condition did not. Thus, even brief monitor and acceptance training is well suited to increasing the likelihood that individuals can monitor and accept their thoughts and feelings when confronted with strong emotions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信