随你喜欢还是随你不喜欢:莎士比亚的《雅顿》、托马斯-莫尔的《乌托邦》及其不满情绪

Elizabeth Bloch
{"title":"随你喜欢还是随你不喜欢:莎士比亚的《雅顿》、托马斯-莫尔的《乌托邦》及其不满情绪","authors":"Elizabeth Bloch","doi":"10.1177/01847678241260582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although As You Like It is criticised for the doubleness of its utopian vision, this article posits that the Forest of Arden challenges characters, spectators, and readers to evaluate alternative societies in the mode of Thomas More's Utopia (1516). Some characters, including More's Raphael Hythlodaeus and Shakespeare's Jaques, reject this dialectical education and refuse to apply their utopian experience to the governance of a ship of state. An alternative is embodied in Morus, More's narrator-character, and Rosalind, Shakespeare's poet-stage director. Shakespeare and More interrogate the relationship between the ideal and the real through a dialectically utopian mode of literary inquiry.","PeriodicalId":517401,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers Élisabéthains","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"As You Like It or As You Don’t: Shakespeare's Arden, Thomas More's Utopia, and their discontents\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Bloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01847678241260582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although As You Like It is criticised for the doubleness of its utopian vision, this article posits that the Forest of Arden challenges characters, spectators, and readers to evaluate alternative societies in the mode of Thomas More's Utopia (1516). Some characters, including More's Raphael Hythlodaeus and Shakespeare's Jaques, reject this dialectical education and refuse to apply their utopian experience to the governance of a ship of state. An alternative is embodied in Morus, More's narrator-character, and Rosalind, Shakespeare's poet-stage director. Shakespeare and More interrogate the relationship between the ideal and the real through a dialectically utopian mode of literary inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cahiers Élisabéthains\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cahiers Élisabéthains\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01847678241260582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers Élisabéthains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01847678241260582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管《如你所愿》因其乌托邦愿景的双重性而备受批评,但本文认为,《亚顿森林》挑战了剧中人物、观众和读者,让他们以托马斯-莫尔的《乌托邦》(1516 年)的模式来评估替代性社会。一些角色,包括莫尔笔下的拉斐尔-希斯洛代乌斯和莎士比亚笔下的雅克,拒绝接受这种辩证教育,拒绝将他们的乌托邦经验应用于国家治理。莫尔的叙述者莫鲁斯和莎士比亚的诗人兼舞台导演罗莎琳德则体现了另一种选择。莎士比亚和莫尔通过一种辩证的乌托邦文学探究模式,对理想与现实之间的关系进行了拷问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
As You Like It or As You Don’t: Shakespeare's Arden, Thomas More's Utopia, and their discontents
Although As You Like It is criticised for the doubleness of its utopian vision, this article posits that the Forest of Arden challenges characters, spectators, and readers to evaluate alternative societies in the mode of Thomas More's Utopia (1516). Some characters, including More's Raphael Hythlodaeus and Shakespeare's Jaques, reject this dialectical education and refuse to apply their utopian experience to the governance of a ship of state. An alternative is embodied in Morus, More's narrator-character, and Rosalind, Shakespeare's poet-stage director. Shakespeare and More interrogate the relationship between the ideal and the real through a dialectically utopian mode of literary inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信