探索在线学术写作环境中印尼 EFL 学生的词汇多样性及其与学术词汇使用的相关性

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Beauty Sholeha Raufi, Herri Mulyono, Hamzah Puadi Ilyas, Siti Zulaiha
{"title":"探索在线学术写作环境中印尼 EFL 学生的词汇多样性及其与学术词汇使用的相关性","authors":"Beauty Sholeha Raufi,&nbsp;Herri Mulyono,&nbsp;Hamzah Puadi Ilyas,&nbsp;Siti Zulaiha","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2024.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports on a quasi-experimental study designed to explore the relationship between lexical diversity and academic vocabulary use among Indonesian EFL university students engaging in online academic writing discussions and assignments. The study analysed 11,624 tokens and 5437 types collected from students' contributions in online discussions and academic writing assignments. Findings revealed that the level of lexical diversity among the students was significantly varied depending on the text length and the total amount of data. It was found most students were indicated to possess average ESL level of academic writing with a D value ranging from 50 to 70 while some others indicated a high level of adult ESL with developed academic text in the range between 70 and 80 D level. Moreover, it was also found that the degree of lexical diversity was not affected by the writing topic familiarity or students' academic year. Findings revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between measures of lexical diversity and academic vocabulary use. Contrary to expectations, while a diversified vocabulary generally correlates positively with student writing performance, this relationship reverses in contexts emphasizing the academic quality of writing. These results highlight the complex dynamics of lexical usage in academic writing and suggest that mere lexical diversity does not always equate to higher academic writing quality. This study contributes to a critical understanding of how lexical diversity functions in digital academic environments and offers implications for English language teaching practices in higher education settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000341/pdfft?md5=f8c06cfd8f21ed09db4149b49d8d45b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2215039024000341-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Indonesian EFL students’ lexical diversity and its correlation with academic vocabulary use in an online academic writing environment\",\"authors\":\"Beauty Sholeha Raufi,&nbsp;Herri Mulyono,&nbsp;Hamzah Puadi Ilyas,&nbsp;Siti Zulaiha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amper.2024.100196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper reports on a quasi-experimental study designed to explore the relationship between lexical diversity and academic vocabulary use among Indonesian EFL university students engaging in online academic writing discussions and assignments. The study analysed 11,624 tokens and 5437 types collected from students' contributions in online discussions and academic writing assignments. Findings revealed that the level of lexical diversity among the students was significantly varied depending on the text length and the total amount of data. It was found most students were indicated to possess average ESL level of academic writing with a D value ranging from 50 to 70 while some others indicated a high level of adult ESL with developed academic text in the range between 70 and 80 D level. Moreover, it was also found that the degree of lexical diversity was not affected by the writing topic familiarity or students' academic year. Findings revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between measures of lexical diversity and academic vocabulary use. Contrary to expectations, while a diversified vocabulary generally correlates positively with student writing performance, this relationship reverses in contexts emphasizing the academic quality of writing. These results highlight the complex dynamics of lexical usage in academic writing and suggest that mere lexical diversity does not always equate to higher academic writing quality. This study contributes to a critical understanding of how lexical diversity functions in digital academic environments and offers implications for English language teaching practices in higher education settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ampersand\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000341/pdfft?md5=f8c06cfd8f21ed09db4149b49d8d45b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2215039024000341-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ampersand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报告了一项准实验研究,旨在探讨参与在线学术写作讨论和作业的印度尼西亚 EFL 大学生的词汇多样性与学术词汇使用之间的关系。研究分析了从学生在线讨论和学术写作作业中收集到的 11624 个词块和 5437 个类型。研究结果表明,根据文本长度和数据总量的不同,学生的词汇多样性水平有很大差异。研究发现,大多数学生的 ESL 学术写作水平一般,D 值介于 50 到 70 之间,而另一些学生的 ESL 水平较高,学术文章的 D 值介于 70 到 80 之间。此外,研究还发现,词汇多样性程度不受写作主题熟悉程度或学生学年的影响。研究结果表明,词汇多样性与学术词汇使用之间存在统计学意义上的显著负相关。与预期相反,虽然词汇多样化通常与学生的写作成绩呈正相关,但在强调写作学术性的语境中,这种关系却发生了逆转。这些结果凸显了学术写作中词汇使用的复杂动态,并表明单纯的词汇多样性并不总是等同于更高的学术写作质量。本研究有助于深入理解词汇多样性在数字学术环境中的作用,并对高等教育环境中的英语教学实践产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Indonesian EFL students’ lexical diversity and its correlation with academic vocabulary use in an online academic writing environment

This paper reports on a quasi-experimental study designed to explore the relationship between lexical diversity and academic vocabulary use among Indonesian EFL university students engaging in online academic writing discussions and assignments. The study analysed 11,624 tokens and 5437 types collected from students' contributions in online discussions and academic writing assignments. Findings revealed that the level of lexical diversity among the students was significantly varied depending on the text length and the total amount of data. It was found most students were indicated to possess average ESL level of academic writing with a D value ranging from 50 to 70 while some others indicated a high level of adult ESL with developed academic text in the range between 70 and 80 D level. Moreover, it was also found that the degree of lexical diversity was not affected by the writing topic familiarity or students' academic year. Findings revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between measures of lexical diversity and academic vocabulary use. Contrary to expectations, while a diversified vocabulary generally correlates positively with student writing performance, this relationship reverses in contexts emphasizing the academic quality of writing. These results highlight the complex dynamics of lexical usage in academic writing and suggest that mere lexical diversity does not always equate to higher academic writing quality. This study contributes to a critical understanding of how lexical diversity functions in digital academic environments and offers implications for English language teaching practices in higher education settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信