开发一种工具来测量护理专业学生在临床实践中对护士的态度:定量研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ali Kaplan , Özlem Kaplan , Cevriye Özdemir , Büşra Emir
{"title":"开发一种工具来测量护理专业学生在临床实践中对护士的态度:定量研究","authors":"Ali Kaplan ,&nbsp;Özlem Kaplan ,&nbsp;Cevriye Özdemir ,&nbsp;Büşra Emir","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study was conducted to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during the clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses affect the clinical practice process of nursing students and play an important role in the latter gaining experience. Evaluation of students’ attitudes towards nurses is a critical factor for the training of qualified nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This study used a quantitative cross-sectional design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted between February and March 2024 with 408 students studying in the nursing department of a university in Türkiye. The item pool of the scale was formed with 45 items through literature review and qualitative data analysis and presented to 21 experts. After the content validity, the draft scale consisting of 38 items was used as a data collection tool. Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin Coefficient, Bartlett’s test, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Varimax Factor Rotation Method, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Cronbach’s Alpha Internal Consistency Coefficient, Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests were used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Exploratory factor analysis revealed 28 items and three sub-dimensions in the scale. Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.902 for the cooperation and understanding sub-dimension, 0.925 for the communication skills and guidance sub-dimension, 0.723 for the support for professional development sub-dimension and 0.946 for the total scale. According to the confirmatory factor analysis fit index results of the scale, RMSEA value was 0.054 and χ2/df value was 2.189. As a result of the analysis conducted to determine the test-retest reliability, it was determined that all items and factor scores showed significant relationships between the two applications (p&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during the clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 104127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an instrument to measure nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during clinical practice: A quantitative study\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kaplan ,&nbsp;Özlem Kaplan ,&nbsp;Cevriye Özdemir ,&nbsp;Büşra Emir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study was conducted to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during the clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses affect the clinical practice process of nursing students and play an important role in the latter gaining experience. Evaluation of students’ attitudes towards nurses is a critical factor for the training of qualified nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This study used a quantitative cross-sectional design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted between February and March 2024 with 408 students studying in the nursing department of a university in Türkiye. The item pool of the scale was formed with 45 items through literature review and qualitative data analysis and presented to 21 experts. After the content validity, the draft scale consisting of 38 items was used as a data collection tool. Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin Coefficient, Bartlett’s test, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Varimax Factor Rotation Method, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Cronbach’s Alpha Internal Consistency Coefficient, Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests were used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Exploratory factor analysis revealed 28 items and three sub-dimensions in the scale. Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.902 for the cooperation and understanding sub-dimension, 0.925 for the communication skills and guidance sub-dimension, 0.723 for the support for professional development sub-dimension and 0.946 for the total scale. According to the confirmatory factor analysis fit index results of the scale, RMSEA value was 0.054 and χ2/df value was 2.189. As a result of the analysis conducted to determine the test-retest reliability, it was determined that all items and factor scores showed significant relationships between the two applications (p&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during the clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002567\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景护士影响着护理专业学生的临床实践过程,并在后者积累经验的过程中发挥着重要作用。评价学生对护士的态度是培养合格护士的关键因素。方法本研究于 2024 年 2 月至 3 月进行,共有 408 名学生在土耳其一所大学的护理系学习。通过文献回顾和定性数据分析,形成了包含 45 个项目的量表项目库,并提交给 21 位专家。经过内容效度验证后,由 38 个项目组成的量表草案被用作数据收集工具。数据分析采用了 Lawshe 内容效度比、Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin 系数、Bartlett 检验、探索性因素分析、主成分分析、Varimax 因子旋转法、确认性因素分析、Cronbach's Alpha 内部一致性系数、Spearman 相关系数和 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks 检验。合作与理解子维度的 Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性系数为 0.902,沟通技巧与指导子维度的 Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性系数为 0.925,支持专业发展子维度的 Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性系数为 0.723,总量表的 Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性系数为 0.946。根据量表的确认性因素分析拟合指数结果,RMSEA 值为 0.054,χ2/df 值为 2.189。结论该量表是一种有效、可靠的测量工具,可用于确定护生在临床实践中对护士的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing an instrument to measure nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during clinical practice: A quantitative study

Aim

This study was conducted to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during the clinical practice.

Background

Nurses affect the clinical practice process of nursing students and play an important role in the latter gaining experience. Evaluation of students’ attitudes towards nurses is a critical factor for the training of qualified nurses.

Design

This study used a quantitative cross-sectional design.

Methods

This study was conducted between February and March 2024 with 408 students studying in the nursing department of a university in Türkiye. The item pool of the scale was formed with 45 items through literature review and qualitative data analysis and presented to 21 experts. After the content validity, the draft scale consisting of 38 items was used as a data collection tool. Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin Coefficient, Bartlett’s test, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Varimax Factor Rotation Method, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Cronbach’s Alpha Internal Consistency Coefficient, Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests were used to analyze the data.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis revealed 28 items and three sub-dimensions in the scale. Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.902 for the cooperation and understanding sub-dimension, 0.925 for the communication skills and guidance sub-dimension, 0.723 for the support for professional development sub-dimension and 0.946 for the total scale. According to the confirmatory factor analysis fit index results of the scale, RMSEA value was 0.054 and χ2/df value was 2.189. As a result of the analysis conducted to determine the test-retest reliability, it was determined that all items and factor scores showed significant relationships between the two applications (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine nursing students’ attitudes towards nurses during the clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信