Avelumab 维持疗法与继续化疗后使用 Pembrolizumab 对化疗 4 周期后无进展的转移性尿路上皮癌的疗效比较:使用倾向得分匹配的回顾性研究

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Keita Kobayashi , Hiroaki Matsumoto , Shigeru Sakano , Mitsutaka Yamamoto , Masahiro Tsuchida , Yasuhide Tei , Kazuhiro Nagao , Kazuo Oba , Seiji Kitahara , Seiji Yano , Satoru Yoshihiro , Yoshiaki Yamamoto , Chietaka Ohmi , Hirotaka Komatsu , Taku Misumi , Jumpei Akao , Koji Shiraishi
{"title":"Avelumab 维持疗法与继续化疗后使用 Pembrolizumab 对化疗 4 周期后无进展的转移性尿路上皮癌的疗效比较:使用倾向得分匹配的回顾性研究","authors":"Keita Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Shigeru Sakano ,&nbsp;Mitsutaka Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Masahiro Tsuchida ,&nbsp;Yasuhide Tei ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Nagao ,&nbsp;Kazuo Oba ,&nbsp;Seiji Kitahara ,&nbsp;Seiji Yano ,&nbsp;Satoru Yoshihiro ,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Chietaka Ohmi ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Komatsu ,&nbsp;Taku Misumi ,&nbsp;Jumpei Akao ,&nbsp;Koji Shiraishi","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In cases of metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma with no disease progression after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, including platinum agents, treatment options include continuation of chemotherapy or switching to maintenance therapy with avelumab. This study compared the treatment outcomes of avelumab maintenance therapy with those of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma using propensity score matching.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Between January 2017 and December 2022, 243 patients with metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma were treated with either avelumab or pembrolizumab at the Yamaguchi University Hospital and its affiliated institutions. We retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes and adverse events by aligning patient characteristics and treatment backgrounds using propensity score matching.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis compared 36 cases receiving avelumab maintenance therapy after chemotherapy to 49 cases where patients, after receiving 4 courses of chemotherapy including platinum-based agents without disease progression, were subsequently administered pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment following disease progression. Using propensity score matching, 27 cases from each group were selected for comparison. From the initiation of prechemotherapy to disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors, the median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 23.3 months in the avelumab and pembrolizumab groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (<em>P</em> = .358). However, avelumab tended to have a lower rate of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment compared to pembrolizumab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Progression-free survival was similar for avelumab maintenance therapy and the sequence of continued chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab after no disease progression at four chemotherapy courses. Avelumab may require less high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, potentially enhancing safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Versus Continued Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma With No Progression After 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching\",\"authors\":\"Keita Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Shigeru Sakano ,&nbsp;Mitsutaka Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Masahiro Tsuchida ,&nbsp;Yasuhide Tei ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Nagao ,&nbsp;Kazuo Oba ,&nbsp;Seiji Kitahara ,&nbsp;Seiji Yano ,&nbsp;Satoru Yoshihiro ,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Chietaka Ohmi ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Komatsu ,&nbsp;Taku Misumi ,&nbsp;Jumpei Akao ,&nbsp;Koji Shiraishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In cases of metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma with no disease progression after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, including platinum agents, treatment options include continuation of chemotherapy or switching to maintenance therapy with avelumab. This study compared the treatment outcomes of avelumab maintenance therapy with those of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma using propensity score matching.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Between January 2017 and December 2022, 243 patients with metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma were treated with either avelumab or pembrolizumab at the Yamaguchi University Hospital and its affiliated institutions. We retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes and adverse events by aligning patient characteristics and treatment backgrounds using propensity score matching.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis compared 36 cases receiving avelumab maintenance therapy after chemotherapy to 49 cases where patients, after receiving 4 courses of chemotherapy including platinum-based agents without disease progression, were subsequently administered pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment following disease progression. Using propensity score matching, 27 cases from each group were selected for comparison. From the initiation of prechemotherapy to disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors, the median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 23.3 months in the avelumab and pembrolizumab groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (<em>P</em> = .358). However, avelumab tended to have a lower rate of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment compared to pembrolizumab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Progression-free survival was similar for avelumab maintenance therapy and the sequence of continued chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab after no disease progression at four chemotherapy courses. Avelumab may require less high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, potentially enhancing safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在转移性和不可切除的尿路上皮癌患者中,如果经过4个周期的化疗(包括铂类药物)后疾病没有进展,治疗方案包括继续化疗或改用阿维列单抗维持治疗。本研究采用倾向评分匹配法比较了阿维单抗维持治疗与彭博利珠单抗治疗尿路上皮癌的疗效。患者与方法2017年1月至2022年12月期间,山口大学医院及其附属机构对243名转移性和不可切除尿路上皮癌患者进行了阿维单抗或彭博利珠单抗治疗。结果分析比较了36例化疗后接受阿维单抗维持治疗的患者和49例化疗后接受包括铂类药物在内的4个疗程化疗未见疾病进展,随后在疾病进展后接受pembrolizumab作为二线治疗的患者。通过倾向评分匹配,从每组中选出27例进行比较。从开始接受化疗前治疗到使用免疫检查点抑制剂出现疾病进展,阿维单抗组和pembrolizumab组的中位无进展生存期分别为20.7个月和23.3个月,未观察到统计学上的显著差异(P = .358)。然而,与pembrolizumab相比,阿维单抗的大剂量糖皮质激素治疗率往往更低。结论阿维单抗维持治疗和在四个化疗疗程无疾病进展后继续化疗再用pembrolizumab的无进展生存期相似。Avelumab可能需要较少的大剂量糖皮质激素治疗,从而可能提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Efficacy of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Versus Continued Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma With No Progression After 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching

Introduction

In cases of metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma with no disease progression after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, including platinum agents, treatment options include continuation of chemotherapy or switching to maintenance therapy with avelumab. This study compared the treatment outcomes of avelumab maintenance therapy with those of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma using propensity score matching.

Patients and Methods

Between January 2017 and December 2022, 243 patients with metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma were treated with either avelumab or pembrolizumab at the Yamaguchi University Hospital and its affiliated institutions. We retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes and adverse events by aligning patient characteristics and treatment backgrounds using propensity score matching.

Results

The analysis compared 36 cases receiving avelumab maintenance therapy after chemotherapy to 49 cases where patients, after receiving 4 courses of chemotherapy including platinum-based agents without disease progression, were subsequently administered pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment following disease progression. Using propensity score matching, 27 cases from each group were selected for comparison. From the initiation of prechemotherapy to disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors, the median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 23.3 months in the avelumab and pembrolizumab groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (P = .358). However, avelumab tended to have a lower rate of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment compared to pembrolizumab.

Conclusion

Progression-free survival was similar for avelumab maintenance therapy and the sequence of continued chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab after no disease progression at four chemotherapy courses. Avelumab may require less high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, potentially enhancing safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信