口腔健康对呼吸机相关肺炎的影响

Bailey Miles, Sarah Beth Tanner, Krystal Herring RDH, MPH
{"title":"口腔健康对呼吸机相关肺炎的影响","authors":"Bailey Miles,&nbsp;Sarah Beth Tanner,&nbsp;Krystal Herring RDH, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the role oral hygiene plays in decreasing the risk of contracting Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) for patients on life-support.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Five different research studies were used to measure the effectiveness of various mouthwashes ability to prevent VAP. The mouthwashes evaluated were Clove mouthwash, Ozonated Water (OZW), Chlorohexidine Gluconate (CHG), and Povidone Iodine. For each study, the patients were split into a control and experimental group. All patients were treated with the designated mouthwash, using a mouth swab for application. There was a variation of the duration of each study, as well as the time intervals of mouthwash application. The studies were conducted over the course of anywhere from a few hours to several days. There were numerous data collection instruments used throughout each study to measure the incidence of VAP contraction, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHEII), The Beck Oral Assessment Scale (BOAS), and Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>• Study One: 40% participants in Chlorohexidine group contracted VAP; double that of the Clove Extract group • Study Two: 9 out of 36 patients in OZW group contracted VAP; 17 out of 37 patients in CHG group contracted VAP • Study Three: Experimental group showed an overall reduction in bacterial growth • Study Four: 0% VAP contraction in experimental group; 10.58% contraction in control group • Study Five: 10 patients in CHG group contracted VAP; 17 patients in placebo group contracted VAP</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Overall, this literature review confirms that mouthwash solutions do have a positive effect in the reduction of VAP in critically ill patients. However, research has not consistently shown one solution to be more triumphant than another, when compared.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>In a hospital setting the findings influence clinical dentistry by showing the importance of providing professional cleanings within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation, providing oral care using an antibacterial mouthwash 3 times a day, and ensuring that patients teeth are brushed twice a day. In a private practice setting the findings show the importance/need of advocating for patients receiving proper oral care while in a critically ill state and spreading awareness on the effect that oral hygiene has on preventing VAP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000452/pdfft?md5=ac310a8f99c9b81b1035e6630087d9a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000452-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Health Impact on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia\",\"authors\":\"Bailey Miles,&nbsp;Sarah Beth Tanner,&nbsp;Krystal Herring RDH, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the role oral hygiene plays in decreasing the risk of contracting Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) for patients on life-support.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Five different research studies were used to measure the effectiveness of various mouthwashes ability to prevent VAP. The mouthwashes evaluated were Clove mouthwash, Ozonated Water (OZW), Chlorohexidine Gluconate (CHG), and Povidone Iodine. For each study, the patients were split into a control and experimental group. All patients were treated with the designated mouthwash, using a mouth swab for application. There was a variation of the duration of each study, as well as the time intervals of mouthwash application. The studies were conducted over the course of anywhere from a few hours to several days. There were numerous data collection instruments used throughout each study to measure the incidence of VAP contraction, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHEII), The Beck Oral Assessment Scale (BOAS), and Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>• Study One: 40% participants in Chlorohexidine group contracted VAP; double that of the Clove Extract group • Study Two: 9 out of 36 patients in OZW group contracted VAP; 17 out of 37 patients in CHG group contracted VAP • Study Three: Experimental group showed an overall reduction in bacterial growth • Study Four: 0% VAP contraction in experimental group; 10.58% contraction in control group • Study Five: 10 patients in CHG group contracted VAP; 17 patients in placebo group contracted VAP</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Overall, this literature review confirms that mouthwash solutions do have a positive effect in the reduction of VAP in critically ill patients. However, research has not consistently shown one solution to be more triumphant than another, when compared.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>In a hospital setting the findings influence clinical dentistry by showing the importance of providing professional cleanings within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation, providing oral care using an antibacterial mouthwash 3 times a day, and ensuring that patients teeth are brushed twice a day. In a private practice setting the findings show the importance/need of advocating for patients receiving proper oral care while in a critically ill state and spreading awareness on the effect that oral hygiene has on preventing VAP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000452/pdfft?md5=ac310a8f99c9b81b1035e6630087d9a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000452-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估口腔卫生在降低接受生命支持的患者感染呼吸机相关肺炎 (VAP) 的风险方面所起的作用。方法使用五项不同的研究来衡量各种漱口水预防 VAP 的有效性。接受评估的漱口水包括丁香漱口水、臭氧水 (OZW)、葡萄糖酸氯己定 (CHG) 和聚维酮碘。每项研究都将患者分为对照组和实验组。所有患者都使用指定的漱口水进行治疗,并使用口腔棉签涂抹。每项研究的持续时间和使用漱口水的时间间隔各不相同。研究时间从几小时到几天不等。每项研究都使用了大量数据收集工具来测量 VAP 感染率,如急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II (APACHEII)、贝克口腔评估量表 (BOAS) 和改良临床肺部感染评分 (MCPIS)。结果-- 研究一:氯己定组有 40% 的参与者感染了 VAP;是丁香提取物组的两倍-- 研究二:OZW 组的 36 名患者中有 9 名感染了 VAP;CHG 组的 37 名患者中有 17 名感染了 VAP-- 研究三:研究四:实验组的 VAP 感染率为 0%;对照组的感染率为 10.58% - 研究五:CHG 组有 10 名患者感染 VAP;安慰剂组有 17 名患者感染 VAPCONCLUSIONSOverall, this literature review confirms that mouthwash solutions do have a positive effect in the reduction of VAP in critically ill patients.意义在医院环境中,研究结果表明了在机械通气 24 小时内提供专业清洁、每天使用抗菌漱口水进行口腔护理 3 次以及确保患者每天刷牙两次的重要性,从而对临床牙科治疗产生了影响。在私人诊所中,研究结果表明了倡导病人在重病状态下接受适当口腔护理的重要性/必要性,以及宣传口腔卫生对预防 VAP 的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral Health Impact on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the role oral hygiene plays in decreasing the risk of contracting Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) for patients on life-support.

METHODS

Five different research studies were used to measure the effectiveness of various mouthwashes ability to prevent VAP. The mouthwashes evaluated were Clove mouthwash, Ozonated Water (OZW), Chlorohexidine Gluconate (CHG), and Povidone Iodine. For each study, the patients were split into a control and experimental group. All patients were treated with the designated mouthwash, using a mouth swab for application. There was a variation of the duration of each study, as well as the time intervals of mouthwash application. The studies were conducted over the course of anywhere from a few hours to several days. There were numerous data collection instruments used throughout each study to measure the incidence of VAP contraction, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHEII), The Beck Oral Assessment Scale (BOAS), and Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS).

RESULTS

• Study One: 40% participants in Chlorohexidine group contracted VAP; double that of the Clove Extract group • Study Two: 9 out of 36 patients in OZW group contracted VAP; 17 out of 37 patients in CHG group contracted VAP • Study Three: Experimental group showed an overall reduction in bacterial growth • Study Four: 0% VAP contraction in experimental group; 10.58% contraction in control group • Study Five: 10 patients in CHG group contracted VAP; 17 patients in placebo group contracted VAP

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this literature review confirms that mouthwash solutions do have a positive effect in the reduction of VAP in critically ill patients. However, research has not consistently shown one solution to be more triumphant than another, when compared.

IMPLICATIONS

In a hospital setting the findings influence clinical dentistry by showing the importance of providing professional cleanings within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation, providing oral care using an antibacterial mouthwash 3 times a day, and ensuring that patients teeth are brushed twice a day. In a private practice setting the findings show the importance/need of advocating for patients receiving proper oral care while in a critically ill state and spreading awareness on the effect that oral hygiene has on preventing VAP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信