相对于上颌牙齿的骨内后上齿槽动脉分布情况

Carsen R. McDaniel
{"title":"相对于上颌牙齿的骨内后上齿槽动脉分布情况","authors":"Carsen R. McDaniel","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Discuss which factors, if any, lead to increased identification of the intraosseous branch of the posterior superior alveolar artery within the lateral wall of the sinus. Assess the distance from the CEJ of posterior teeth to the intraosseous branch of the posterior super alveolar artery.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>254 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of maxillary sinuses acquired using two scanners were analyzed for identification of the intraosseous branch (IoBr) of the posterior superior alveolar artery. The distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and IoBr was recorded at each maxillary posterior tooth position. Binomial logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to evaluate the effects of scanner type, CBCT parameters, sex, and age on IoBr detection and CEJ-IoBr distance, respectively. P-values &lt; 0.05 were used to determine significance.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Mean CEJ-IoBr distances at second molar, first molar, second premolar, and first premolar positions were 17.0 ± 4.0 mm, 21.8 ± 4.1 mm, 19.5 ± 4.7 mm, and 19.9 ± 4.9 mm (scanner 1) and 17.3 ± 3.5, 16.9 ± 4.3, 18.5 ± 4.1, and 18.4 ± 4.3 (scanner 2). The independent variables had no statistically significant effect on IoBr detection. Tooth position (b = -0.67, P &lt; .001) and scanner type (b = -1.3, P = 0.001) were statistically significant predictors of CEJ-IoBr distance.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Estimations of CEJ-IoBr distance using CBCT appear comparable with previous cadaver, CT and CBCT based studies. CBCT scanner type may have a minor influence on this parameter. None of the independent variables had a significant effect on IoBr detection.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Through this project, we determined that increasing resolution of CBCT imaging in order to increase identification of the intraosseous branch is not indicated. Furthermore, we determined that a given CBCT imaging system and tooth position may have a significant impact of the distance from the cementoenamel junction of posterior teeth to the inferior border of the intraosseous branch of the posterior superior alveolar artery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000531/pdfft?md5=0e1b818acab3be3b10acf0cb791a410a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000531-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraosseous posterior superior alveolar artery distribution relative to maxillary teeth\",\"authors\":\"Carsen R. McDaniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Discuss which factors, if any, lead to increased identification of the intraosseous branch of the posterior superior alveolar artery within the lateral wall of the sinus. Assess the distance from the CEJ of posterior teeth to the intraosseous branch of the posterior super alveolar artery.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>254 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of maxillary sinuses acquired using two scanners were analyzed for identification of the intraosseous branch (IoBr) of the posterior superior alveolar artery. The distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and IoBr was recorded at each maxillary posterior tooth position. Binomial logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to evaluate the effects of scanner type, CBCT parameters, sex, and age on IoBr detection and CEJ-IoBr distance, respectively. P-values &lt; 0.05 were used to determine significance.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Mean CEJ-IoBr distances at second molar, first molar, second premolar, and first premolar positions were 17.0 ± 4.0 mm, 21.8 ± 4.1 mm, 19.5 ± 4.7 mm, and 19.9 ± 4.9 mm (scanner 1) and 17.3 ± 3.5, 16.9 ± 4.3, 18.5 ± 4.1, and 18.4 ± 4.3 (scanner 2). The independent variables had no statistically significant effect on IoBr detection. Tooth position (b = -0.67, P &lt; .001) and scanner type (b = -1.3, P = 0.001) were statistically significant predictors of CEJ-IoBr distance.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Estimations of CEJ-IoBr distance using CBCT appear comparable with previous cadaver, CT and CBCT based studies. CBCT scanner type may have a minor influence on this parameter. None of the independent variables had a significant effect on IoBr detection.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Through this project, we determined that increasing resolution of CBCT imaging in order to increase identification of the intraosseous branch is not indicated. Furthermore, we determined that a given CBCT imaging system and tooth position may have a significant impact of the distance from the cementoenamel junction of posterior teeth to the inferior border of the intraosseous branch of the posterior superior alveolar artery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000531/pdfft?md5=0e1b818acab3be3b10acf0cb791a410a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000531-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的讨论哪些因素(如果有的话)会导致窦侧壁内的后上齿槽动脉骨内支的识别率提高。方法对使用两种扫描仪获得的 254 张上颌窦锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描图像进行分析,以确定后牙槽上动脉的骨内分支(IoBr)。记录了每个上颌后牙位置的牙本质釉质交界处(CEJ)与 IoBr 之间的距离。二项式逻辑回归和多元线性回归分别用于评估扫描仪类型、CBCT参数、性别和年龄对IoBr检测和CEJ-IoBr距离的影响。结果第二磨牙、第一磨牙、第二前磨牙和第一前磨牙位置的平均 CEJ-IoBr 距离分别为 17.0 ± 4.0 mm、21.8 ± 4.1 mm、19.5 ± 4.7 mm 和 19.9 ± 4.9 mm(扫描仪 1)和 17.3 ± 3.5、16.9 ± 4.3、18.5 ± 4.1 和 18.4 ± 4.3(扫描仪 2)。自变量对 IoBr 检测没有明显的统计学影响。牙位(b = -0.67,P = 0.001)和扫描仪类型(b = -1.3,P = 0.001)对 CEJ-IoBr 距离的预测具有统计学意义。CBCT 扫描仪类型可能对该参数影响较小。没有一个自变量对 IoBr 的检测有明显的影响。意义通过这个项目,我们确定提高 CBCT 成像的分辨率以增加对骨内分支的识别并不适用。此外,我们还确定,特定的 CBCT 成像系统和牙齿位置可能会对后牙的牙本质釉质交界处到后上齿槽动脉骨内支下缘的距离产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraosseous posterior superior alveolar artery distribution relative to maxillary teeth

OBJECTIVES

Discuss which factors, if any, lead to increased identification of the intraosseous branch of the posterior superior alveolar artery within the lateral wall of the sinus. Assess the distance from the CEJ of posterior teeth to the intraosseous branch of the posterior super alveolar artery.

METHODS

254 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of maxillary sinuses acquired using two scanners were analyzed for identification of the intraosseous branch (IoBr) of the posterior superior alveolar artery. The distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and IoBr was recorded at each maxillary posterior tooth position. Binomial logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to evaluate the effects of scanner type, CBCT parameters, sex, and age on IoBr detection and CEJ-IoBr distance, respectively. P-values < 0.05 were used to determine significance.

RESULTS

Mean CEJ-IoBr distances at second molar, first molar, second premolar, and first premolar positions were 17.0 ± 4.0 mm, 21.8 ± 4.1 mm, 19.5 ± 4.7 mm, and 19.9 ± 4.9 mm (scanner 1) and 17.3 ± 3.5, 16.9 ± 4.3, 18.5 ± 4.1, and 18.4 ± 4.3 (scanner 2). The independent variables had no statistically significant effect on IoBr detection. Tooth position (b = -0.67, P < .001) and scanner type (b = -1.3, P = 0.001) were statistically significant predictors of CEJ-IoBr distance.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimations of CEJ-IoBr distance using CBCT appear comparable with previous cadaver, CT and CBCT based studies. CBCT scanner type may have a minor influence on this parameter. None of the independent variables had a significant effect on IoBr detection.

IMPLICATIONS

Through this project, we determined that increasing resolution of CBCT imaging in order to increase identification of the intraosseous branch is not indicated. Furthermore, we determined that a given CBCT imaging system and tooth position may have a significant impact of the distance from the cementoenamel junction of posterior teeth to the inferior border of the intraosseous branch of the posterior superior alveolar artery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信