各种树脂密封剂染色后的颜色稳定性

Danila Dokuchayev, Margareth Rivas, Rafael Rocha Pacheco DDS MDS PhD
{"title":"各种树脂密封剂染色后的颜色稳定性","authors":"Danila Dokuchayev,&nbsp;Margareth Rivas,&nbsp;Rafael Rocha Pacheco DDS MDS PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the color change in various resin sealants when activated by a multi-peak light-curing unit (LCU), in comparison to a flowable resin composite.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Four different resin sealants were evaluated: [HS] Helioseal® F Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), [CP] Clinpro™ (3M™ Oral Care), [GS] Grandio Seal (VOCO GmbH), and [XT] Ultraseal XT™ Hydro (Ultradent Products Inc.). A flowable resin composite (3M™ Filtek™ Supreme Flowable Restorative, A2) was used as control. Using PVS, molds were made from custom 3D-printed models measuring 6.0mm in diameter and 2.0mm in height. Materials were inserted into the molds (n=5), covered by a Mylar® strip, pressed using a microscope slide, and light-activated for 20 seconds using a multi-peak LCU (VALO™ X, Ultradent) in standard mode. All specimens were wet-finished and polished using sandpaper (grits 600 and 1200). The L*, a*, and b* color parameters for each specimen were assessed on both white and black backgrounds using a clinical spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade®, VITA Zahnfabrik). A staining protocol using black tea was applied. Each specimen was immersed for 24h at 37oC, rinse and dried, and subjected to a 5-minute ultrasonic bath in distilled water. Data was then collected, and ΔE calculated. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 10.0.2, utilizing ANOVA with a preset alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>All evaluated resin sealants exhibited a ΔE greater than 11, in contrast to the flowable resin composite that was below 3.5. The b* parameter was most influenced, showing a trend towards yellowing (ordered as HS&gt;XT&gt;GS&gt;CP&gt;FT), followed by a decrease in the L* parameter indicating darkening (GS&gt;XT≥HS≥CP&gt;FT). Finally, the a* parameter experienced minor positive and negative variations.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Resin sealants demonstrate higher susceptibility to staining than flowable resin composites. Black tea exposure led to a more yellow hue (increased b*) and a darkening effect (reduced L*) in resin sealants.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Sealants are prone to color changes when exposed to the oral environment, more so than other composite materials or the tooth structure itself. Understanding how this color change occurs is crucial for accurately diagnosing a stained sealant rather than mistaking it for secondary caries. It is noteworthy that different sealants exhibit varying degrees of staining.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000415/pdfft?md5=3878970a5ffc05f74723d77ce428db6e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000415-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Color Stability Of Various Resin Sealants After Staining Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Danila Dokuchayev,&nbsp;Margareth Rivas,&nbsp;Rafael Rocha Pacheco DDS MDS PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the color change in various resin sealants when activated by a multi-peak light-curing unit (LCU), in comparison to a flowable resin composite.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Four different resin sealants were evaluated: [HS] Helioseal® F Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), [CP] Clinpro™ (3M™ Oral Care), [GS] Grandio Seal (VOCO GmbH), and [XT] Ultraseal XT™ Hydro (Ultradent Products Inc.). A flowable resin composite (3M™ Filtek™ Supreme Flowable Restorative, A2) was used as control. Using PVS, molds were made from custom 3D-printed models measuring 6.0mm in diameter and 2.0mm in height. Materials were inserted into the molds (n=5), covered by a Mylar® strip, pressed using a microscope slide, and light-activated for 20 seconds using a multi-peak LCU (VALO™ X, Ultradent) in standard mode. All specimens were wet-finished and polished using sandpaper (grits 600 and 1200). The L*, a*, and b* color parameters for each specimen were assessed on both white and black backgrounds using a clinical spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade®, VITA Zahnfabrik). A staining protocol using black tea was applied. Each specimen was immersed for 24h at 37oC, rinse and dried, and subjected to a 5-minute ultrasonic bath in distilled water. Data was then collected, and ΔE calculated. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 10.0.2, utilizing ANOVA with a preset alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>All evaluated resin sealants exhibited a ΔE greater than 11, in contrast to the flowable resin composite that was below 3.5. The b* parameter was most influenced, showing a trend towards yellowing (ordered as HS&gt;XT&gt;GS&gt;CP&gt;FT), followed by a decrease in the L* parameter indicating darkening (GS&gt;XT≥HS≥CP&gt;FT). Finally, the a* parameter experienced minor positive and negative variations.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Resin sealants demonstrate higher susceptibility to staining than flowable resin composites. Black tea exposure led to a more yellow hue (increased b*) and a darkening effect (reduced L*) in resin sealants.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Sealants are prone to color changes when exposed to the oral environment, more so than other composite materials or the tooth structure itself. Understanding how this color change occurs is crucial for accurately diagnosing a stained sealant rather than mistaking it for secondary caries. It is noteworthy that different sealants exhibit varying degrees of staining.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000415/pdfft?md5=3878970a5ffc05f74723d77ce428db6e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000415-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估各种树脂封闭剂在多峰值光固化装置(LCU)激活时的颜色变化,并与可流动树脂复合材料进行比较。方法评估四种不同的树脂封闭剂:[HS]Helioseal®F Plus(Ivoclar Vivadent)、[CP]Clinpro™(3M™ Oral Care)、[GS]Grandio Seal(VOCO GmbH)和[XT]Ultraseal XT™ Hydro(Ultradent Products Inc.)可流动树脂复合材料(3M™ Filtek™ Supreme 可流动修复体,A2)用作对照。使用 PVS,用直径 6.0 毫米、高 2.0 毫米的定制 3D 打印模型制作模具。将材料插入模具(n=5),用 Mylar® 条覆盖,用显微镜载玻片压紧,并使用多峰值 LCU(VALO™ X,Ultradent)在标准模式下光照 20 秒。所有试样均使用砂纸(600 和 1200 级)进行湿处理和抛光。使用临床分光光度计(VITA Easyshade®,VITA Zahnfabrik)在白色和黑色背景上评估每个试样的 L*、a* 和 b* 颜色参数。使用红茶进行染色。每个标本在 37 摄氏度下浸泡 24 小时,冲洗并烘干,然后在蒸馏水中进行 5 分钟的超声波浴。然后收集数据并计算 ΔE。使用 GraphPad Prism 10.0.2 进行统计分析,采用方差分析,预设α值为 0.05。结果所有评估的树脂密封剂的ΔE 都大于 11,而可流动树脂复合材料则低于 3.5。b* 参数受到的影响最大,呈现出变黄的趋势(排序为 HS>XT>GS>CP>FT),其次是 L* 参数的下降,表明变暗(GS>XT≥HS≥CP>FT)。最后,a* 参数经历了轻微的正负变化。与红茶接触会导致树脂密封剂的色调变黄(b*增加),颜色变深(L*减少)。 意义密封剂暴露在口腔环境中时容易发生颜色变化,比其他复合材料或牙齿结构本身更容易发生颜色变化。了解这种颜色变化是如何发生的,对于准确诊断染色密封剂而不是误认为是继发性龋齿至关重要。值得注意的是,不同的封闭剂会表现出不同程度的染色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Color Stability Of Various Resin Sealants After Staining Protocol

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the color change in various resin sealants when activated by a multi-peak light-curing unit (LCU), in comparison to a flowable resin composite.

METHODS

Four different resin sealants were evaluated: [HS] Helioseal® F Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), [CP] Clinpro™ (3M™ Oral Care), [GS] Grandio Seal (VOCO GmbH), and [XT] Ultraseal XT™ Hydro (Ultradent Products Inc.). A flowable resin composite (3M™ Filtek™ Supreme Flowable Restorative, A2) was used as control. Using PVS, molds were made from custom 3D-printed models measuring 6.0mm in diameter and 2.0mm in height. Materials were inserted into the molds (n=5), covered by a Mylar® strip, pressed using a microscope slide, and light-activated for 20 seconds using a multi-peak LCU (VALO™ X, Ultradent) in standard mode. All specimens were wet-finished and polished using sandpaper (grits 600 and 1200). The L*, a*, and b* color parameters for each specimen were assessed on both white and black backgrounds using a clinical spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade®, VITA Zahnfabrik). A staining protocol using black tea was applied. Each specimen was immersed for 24h at 37oC, rinse and dried, and subjected to a 5-minute ultrasonic bath in distilled water. Data was then collected, and ΔE calculated. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 10.0.2, utilizing ANOVA with a preset alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

All evaluated resin sealants exhibited a ΔE greater than 11, in contrast to the flowable resin composite that was below 3.5. The b* parameter was most influenced, showing a trend towards yellowing (ordered as HS>XT>GS>CP>FT), followed by a decrease in the L* parameter indicating darkening (GS>XT≥HS≥CP>FT). Finally, the a* parameter experienced minor positive and negative variations.

CONCLUSIONS

Resin sealants demonstrate higher susceptibility to staining than flowable resin composites. Black tea exposure led to a more yellow hue (increased b*) and a darkening effect (reduced L*) in resin sealants.

IMPLICATIONS

Sealants are prone to color changes when exposed to the oral environment, more so than other composite materials or the tooth structure itself. Understanding how this color change occurs is crucial for accurately diagnosing a stained sealant rather than mistaking it for secondary caries. It is noteworthy that different sealants exhibit varying degrees of staining.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信