炎症性肠病患者阑尾和结肠癌腹膜转移的手术治疗

Vladislav Kovalik, Mary Caitlin King, Sergei Iugai, Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga, Carol Nieroda, Armando Sardi, Vadim Gushchin
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者阑尾和结肠癌腹膜转移的手术治疗","authors":"Vladislav Kovalik,&nbsp;Mary Caitlin King,&nbsp;Sergei Iugai,&nbsp;Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga,&nbsp;Carol Nieroda,&nbsp;Armando Sardi,&nbsp;Vadim Gushchin","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may compromise outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases (PM) from appendix/colon cancer. We evaluated CRS/HIPEC outcomes in patients with concurrent IBD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A matched cohort study using a prospective institutional CRS/HIPEC database (1998–2023) included appendix/colon cancer patients with PM. We matched IBD patients to IBD-free controls in a 1:5 ratio with nearest-neighbor propensity score for sex, age, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and exact matching for prior CRS/HIPEC and primary tumor. Perioperative variables, including Clavien-Dindo 90-day complications, were compared. Kaplan-Meier overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using stratified Cox regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 605 CRS/HIPECs for appendix/colon cancer, 14 (2.3%) had concurrent Crohn’s disease (n = 6) or ulcerative colitis (n = 8). Seventy IBD-free controls were matched. Nine (64.7%) IBD patients had an appendix primary. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) was achieved in 10 (71.4%) IBD and 57 (81.4%) IBD-free patients (p = 0.468). IBD vs IBD-free patients tended to have more grade-III/IV complications (35.7% [n = 5] vs 15.7% [n = 11], p = 0.082) and had a higher rate of severe nausea/vomiting (35.7% vs 4.3 %, p &lt; 0.001) and diarrhea (28.6% vs 8.6%, p = 0.035). Rates of anastomotic leak (7.1% [n = 1] vs 1.4% [n = 1], p = 0.200) and intraabdominal infections (7.1% [n = 1] vs 2.9% [n = 2], p = 0.430) were similar for IBD vs IBD-free, respectively. IBD did not affect OS (HR [95% CI]: 1.1 [0.4, 2.9]) or PFS (HR [95% CI]: 1.2 [0.4, 3.9]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IBD is associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal complications after CRS/HIPEC for appendix/colon cancer; however, it does not affect OS or PFS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001014/pdfft?md5=5d30dbe9e2d5373a8c1c9cac5f48d2f9&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024001014-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of peritoneal metastases from appendix and colon cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease\",\"authors\":\"Vladislav Kovalik,&nbsp;Mary Caitlin King,&nbsp;Sergei Iugai,&nbsp;Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga,&nbsp;Carol Nieroda,&nbsp;Armando Sardi,&nbsp;Vadim Gushchin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may compromise outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases (PM) from appendix/colon cancer. We evaluated CRS/HIPEC outcomes in patients with concurrent IBD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A matched cohort study using a prospective institutional CRS/HIPEC database (1998–2023) included appendix/colon cancer patients with PM. We matched IBD patients to IBD-free controls in a 1:5 ratio with nearest-neighbor propensity score for sex, age, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and exact matching for prior CRS/HIPEC and primary tumor. Perioperative variables, including Clavien-Dindo 90-day complications, were compared. Kaplan-Meier overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using stratified Cox regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 605 CRS/HIPECs for appendix/colon cancer, 14 (2.3%) had concurrent Crohn’s disease (n = 6) or ulcerative colitis (n = 8). Seventy IBD-free controls were matched. Nine (64.7%) IBD patients had an appendix primary. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) was achieved in 10 (71.4%) IBD and 57 (81.4%) IBD-free patients (p = 0.468). IBD vs IBD-free patients tended to have more grade-III/IV complications (35.7% [n = 5] vs 15.7% [n = 11], p = 0.082) and had a higher rate of severe nausea/vomiting (35.7% vs 4.3 %, p &lt; 0.001) and diarrhea (28.6% vs 8.6%, p = 0.035). Rates of anastomotic leak (7.1% [n = 1] vs 1.4% [n = 1], p = 0.200) and intraabdominal infections (7.1% [n = 1] vs 2.9% [n = 2], p = 0.430) were similar for IBD vs IBD-free, respectively. IBD did not affect OS (HR [95% CI]: 1.1 [0.4, 2.9]) or PFS (HR [95% CI]: 1.2 [0.4, 3.9]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IBD is associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal complications after CRS/HIPEC for appendix/colon cancer; however, it does not affect OS or PFS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001014/pdfft?md5=5d30dbe9e2d5373a8c1c9cac5f48d2f9&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024001014-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024001014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景炎症性肠病(IBD)可能会影响针对阑尾/结肠癌腹膜转移(PM)的细胞切除手术联合腹腔热化疗(CRS/HIPEC)的疗效。我们对并发 IBD 患者的 CRS/HIPEC 结果进行了评估。方法使用前瞻性机构 CRS/HIPEC 数据库(1998-2023 年)进行了一项匹配队列研究,纳入了阑尾/结肠癌 PM 患者。我们将 IBD 患者与无 IBD 对照组按 1:5 的比例进行了匹配,对性别、年龄和腹膜癌指数 (PCI) 进行了最近邻倾向评分,并对既往 CRS/HIPEC 和原发肿瘤进行了精确匹配。比较了围手术期变量,包括 Clavien-Dindo 90 天并发症。结果 在 605 例阑尾/结肠癌 CRS/HIPEC 中,14 例(2.3%)同时患有克罗恩病(6 例)或溃疡性结肠炎(8 例)。70 名无 IBD 的对照组进行了配对。9名(64.7%)IBD患者有阑尾原发癌。10例(71.4%)IBD患者和57例(81.4%)无IBD患者实现了完全细胞减灭术(CC-0/1)(P = 0.468)。IBD 与无 IBD 患者相比,III/IV 级并发症的发生率更高(35.7% [n = 5] vs 15.7% [n = 11],p = 0.082),严重恶心/呕吐(35.7% vs 4.3%,p < 0.001)和腹泻(28.6% vs 8.6%,p = 0.035)的发生率也更高。IBD患者与无IBD患者的吻合口漏(7.1% [n = 1] vs 1.4% [n = 1],p = 0.200)和腹腔内感染(7.1% [n = 1] vs 2.9% [n = 2],p = 0.430)发生率相似。IBD不影响OS(HR [95% CI]:1.1 [0.4, 2.9])或PFS(HR [95% CI]:1.2 [0.4, 3.9])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of peritoneal metastases from appendix and colon cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may compromise outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases (PM) from appendix/colon cancer. We evaluated CRS/HIPEC outcomes in patients with concurrent IBD.

Methods

A matched cohort study using a prospective institutional CRS/HIPEC database (1998–2023) included appendix/colon cancer patients with PM. We matched IBD patients to IBD-free controls in a 1:5 ratio with nearest-neighbor propensity score for sex, age, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and exact matching for prior CRS/HIPEC and primary tumor. Perioperative variables, including Clavien-Dindo 90-day complications, were compared. Kaplan-Meier overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using stratified Cox regression.

Results

Of 605 CRS/HIPECs for appendix/colon cancer, 14 (2.3%) had concurrent Crohn’s disease (n = 6) or ulcerative colitis (n = 8). Seventy IBD-free controls were matched. Nine (64.7%) IBD patients had an appendix primary. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) was achieved in 10 (71.4%) IBD and 57 (81.4%) IBD-free patients (p = 0.468). IBD vs IBD-free patients tended to have more grade-III/IV complications (35.7% [n = 5] vs 15.7% [n = 11], p = 0.082) and had a higher rate of severe nausea/vomiting (35.7% vs 4.3 %, p < 0.001) and diarrhea (28.6% vs 8.6%, p = 0.035). Rates of anastomotic leak (7.1% [n = 1] vs 1.4% [n = 1], p = 0.200) and intraabdominal infections (7.1% [n = 1] vs 2.9% [n = 2], p = 0.430) were similar for IBD vs IBD-free, respectively. IBD did not affect OS (HR [95% CI]: 1.1 [0.4, 2.9]) or PFS (HR [95% CI]: 1.2 [0.4, 3.9]).

Conclusion

IBD is associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal complications after CRS/HIPEC for appendix/colon cancer; however, it does not affect OS or PFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信