PI-QUAL 第 2 版:对一家三级转诊中心的多参数磁共振成像进行的多读取器重现性研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"PI-QUAL 第 2 版:对一家三级转诊中心的多参数磁共振成像进行的多读取器重现性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the Prostate imaging quality version 2 (PI-QUAL v.2) for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) among radiologists with varying levels of expertise.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty men underwent 3 T mpMRI scans in a tertiary referral center. Images were anonymized and assessed by six readers of different expertise (2 expert, 2 basic and 2 beginners) in two sessions: first using PI-QUAL v.2, and then using both PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 after a 2-week interval. PI-QUAL v.2 scores were considered overall and, for comparison with PI-QUAL v.1, dichotomized according to the threshold of acceptable image quality. Gwet AC<sub>1</sub> index was used to calculate the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL v.2 scores was overall moderate (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.55), being higher for expert readers compared to the beginner and basic ones (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.66 versus 0.45–0-58). Intra-reader agreement varied from moderate to perfect (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.43–1.00) and improved with increasing levels of expertise. The ratings were more reproducible for DWI and DCE sequences (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.62–1.00) compared to T2w (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.24–0.70). The intra-reader agreement between PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 scores across readings ranged from almost perfect to perfect (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.96–1.00).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a tertiary referral center context, PI-QUAL v.2 is a moderately reliable tool for standardizing prostate mpMRI quality evaluations among readers with varying expertise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004327/pdfft?md5=35e231cef791aa8391f1ae194a6a555c&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24004327-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PI-QUAL version 2: A Multi-Reader reproducibility study on multiparametric MRI from a tertiary referral center\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the Prostate imaging quality version 2 (PI-QUAL v.2) for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) among radiologists with varying levels of expertise.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty men underwent 3 T mpMRI scans in a tertiary referral center. Images were anonymized and assessed by six readers of different expertise (2 expert, 2 basic and 2 beginners) in two sessions: first using PI-QUAL v.2, and then using both PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 after a 2-week interval. PI-QUAL v.2 scores were considered overall and, for comparison with PI-QUAL v.1, dichotomized according to the threshold of acceptable image quality. Gwet AC<sub>1</sub> index was used to calculate the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL v.2 scores was overall moderate (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.55), being higher for expert readers compared to the beginner and basic ones (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.66 versus 0.45–0-58). Intra-reader agreement varied from moderate to perfect (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.43–1.00) and improved with increasing levels of expertise. The ratings were more reproducible for DWI and DCE sequences (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.62–1.00) compared to T2w (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.24–0.70). The intra-reader agreement between PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 scores across readings ranged from almost perfect to perfect (Gwet’s AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.96–1.00).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a tertiary referral center context, PI-QUAL v.2 is a moderately reliable tool for standardizing prostate mpMRI quality evaluations among readers with varying expertise.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004327/pdfft?md5=35e231cef791aa8391f1ae194a6a555c&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24004327-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估具有不同专业水平的放射科医生对用于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的前列腺成像质量 2 版(PI-QUAL v.2)的读片者之间和读片者内部的一致性。方法 50 名男性在一家三级转诊中心接受了 3 T mpMRI 扫描。图像经过匿名处理,由六名不同专业水平的读者(两名专家、两名基础读者和两名初学者)分两次进行评估:第一次使用 PI-QUAL v.2,间隔两周后同时使用 PI-QUAL v.2 和 v.1。PI-QUAL v.2 的分数被视为总分,为了与 PI-QUAL v.1 进行比较,根据可接受图像质量的阈值进行二分。结果PI-QUAL v.2评分的读者间一致性总体适中(Gwet's AC1 = 0.55),专家级读者的一致性高于初级和基础读者(Gwet's AC1 = 0.66 对 0.45-0-58)。读者内部的一致性从中等到完美不等(Gwet's AC1 = 0.43-1.00),并随着专业水平的提高而提高。与 T2w(Gwet's AC1 = 0.24-0.70)相比,DWI 和 DCE 序列的评分重复性更高(Gwet's AC1 = 0.62-1.00)。结论在三级转诊中心的情况下,PI-QUAL v.2是一个中等可靠的工具,可用于标准化具有不同专业知识的读者的前列腺mpMRI质量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PI-QUAL version 2: A Multi-Reader reproducibility study on multiparametric MRI from a tertiary referral center

Purpose

To assess the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the Prostate imaging quality version 2 (PI-QUAL v.2) for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) among radiologists with varying levels of expertise.

Methods

Fifty men underwent 3 T mpMRI scans in a tertiary referral center. Images were anonymized and assessed by six readers of different expertise (2 expert, 2 basic and 2 beginners) in two sessions: first using PI-QUAL v.2, and then using both PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 after a 2-week interval. PI-QUAL v.2 scores were considered overall and, for comparison with PI-QUAL v.1, dichotomized according to the threshold of acceptable image quality. Gwet AC1 index was used to calculate the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of the scores.

Results

The inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL v.2 scores was overall moderate (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.55), being higher for expert readers compared to the beginner and basic ones (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.66 versus 0.45–0-58). Intra-reader agreement varied from moderate to perfect (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.43–1.00) and improved with increasing levels of expertise. The ratings were more reproducible for DWI and DCE sequences (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.62–1.00) compared to T2w (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.24–0.70). The intra-reader agreement between PI-QUAL v.2 and v.1 scores across readings ranged from almost perfect to perfect (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.96–1.00).

Conclusions

In a tertiary referral center context, PI-QUAL v.2 is a moderately reliable tool for standardizing prostate mpMRI quality evaluations among readers with varying expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信