将接触式 X 射线近距离放射治疗作为选定的早期直肠癌患者的唯一治疗方法 - 多中心研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ngu Wah Than , D. Mark Pritchard , David M. Hughes , Kai Shing Yu , Helen S. Minnaar , Amandeep Dhadda , Jamie Mills , Joakim Folkesson , Calin Radu , C.A. Duckworth , Helen Wong , Muneeb Ul Haq , Rajaram Sripadam , Mark D. Halling-Brown , Alexandra J. Stewart , Arthur Sun Myint
{"title":"将接触式 X 射线近距离放射治疗作为选定的早期直肠癌患者的唯一治疗方法 - 多中心研究","authors":"Ngu Wah Than ,&nbsp;D. Mark Pritchard ,&nbsp;David M. Hughes ,&nbsp;Kai Shing Yu ,&nbsp;Helen S. Minnaar ,&nbsp;Amandeep Dhadda ,&nbsp;Jamie Mills ,&nbsp;Joakim Folkesson ,&nbsp;Calin Radu ,&nbsp;C.A. Duckworth ,&nbsp;Helen Wong ,&nbsp;Muneeb Ul Haq ,&nbsp;Rajaram Sripadam ,&nbsp;Mark D. Halling-Brown ,&nbsp;Alexandra J. Stewart ,&nbsp;Arthur Sun Myint","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Radical surgery is the standard of care for early rectal cancer. However, alternative organ-preserving approaches are attractive, especially in frail or elderly patients as these avoid surgical complications. We have assessed the efficacy of sole Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) treatment in stage-1 rectal cancer patients who were unsuitable for or declined surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective multi-centre study (2009–2021) evaluated 76 patients with T1/2-N0-M0 rectal adenocarcinomas who were treated with CXB alone. Outcomes were assessed for the entire cohort and sub-groups based on the T-stage and the criteria for receiving CXB alone; Group A: patients who were fit enough for surgery but declined, Group B: patients who were high-risk for surgery and Group C: patients who had received prior pelvic radiation for a different cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With a median follow-up of 26(IQR:12–49) months, initial clinical Complete Response (cCR) was 82(70–93)% with rates of local regrowth 18(8–29)%, 3-year actuarial local control (LC) 84(75–95)%, distant relapse 3 %, and no nodal relapse. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66(48–78)% and 58(44–75)%. Lower OS was observed in Groups B [HR:2.54(95 %CI:1.17, 5.59), p = 0.02] and C [HR:2.75(95 %CI:1.15, 6.58), p = 0.03]. Previous pelvic radiation predicted lower cCR and OS. The main toxicity was G1-2 rectal bleeding (26 %) and symptoms of impaired anal sphincter function were not reported in any patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CXB treatment alone achieved a high cCR rate with satisfactory LC and DFS. Inferior oncological outcomes were observed in patients who had received prior pelvic radiotherapy. CXB alone, with its favourable toxicity profile and avoidance of general anaesthesia and surgery risks, therefore, can be considered for patients who are unsuitable for or refuse surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001289/pdfft?md5=cc01f88995e6ee34340069418bb5cf09&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001289-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact X-ray Brachytherapy as a sole treatment in selected patients with early rectal cancer – Multi-centre study\",\"authors\":\"Ngu Wah Than ,&nbsp;D. Mark Pritchard ,&nbsp;David M. Hughes ,&nbsp;Kai Shing Yu ,&nbsp;Helen S. Minnaar ,&nbsp;Amandeep Dhadda ,&nbsp;Jamie Mills ,&nbsp;Joakim Folkesson ,&nbsp;Calin Radu ,&nbsp;C.A. Duckworth ,&nbsp;Helen Wong ,&nbsp;Muneeb Ul Haq ,&nbsp;Rajaram Sripadam ,&nbsp;Mark D. Halling-Brown ,&nbsp;Alexandra J. Stewart ,&nbsp;Arthur Sun Myint\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Radical surgery is the standard of care for early rectal cancer. However, alternative organ-preserving approaches are attractive, especially in frail or elderly patients as these avoid surgical complications. We have assessed the efficacy of sole Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) treatment in stage-1 rectal cancer patients who were unsuitable for or declined surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective multi-centre study (2009–2021) evaluated 76 patients with T1/2-N0-M0 rectal adenocarcinomas who were treated with CXB alone. Outcomes were assessed for the entire cohort and sub-groups based on the T-stage and the criteria for receiving CXB alone; Group A: patients who were fit enough for surgery but declined, Group B: patients who were high-risk for surgery and Group C: patients who had received prior pelvic radiation for a different cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With a median follow-up of 26(IQR:12–49) months, initial clinical Complete Response (cCR) was 82(70–93)% with rates of local regrowth 18(8–29)%, 3-year actuarial local control (LC) 84(75–95)%, distant relapse 3 %, and no nodal relapse. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66(48–78)% and 58(44–75)%. Lower OS was observed in Groups B [HR:2.54(95 %CI:1.17, 5.59), p = 0.02] and C [HR:2.75(95 %CI:1.15, 6.58), p = 0.03]. Previous pelvic radiation predicted lower cCR and OS. The main toxicity was G1-2 rectal bleeding (26 %) and symptoms of impaired anal sphincter function were not reported in any patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CXB treatment alone achieved a high cCR rate with satisfactory LC and DFS. Inferior oncological outcomes were observed in patients who had received prior pelvic radiotherapy. CXB alone, with its favourable toxicity profile and avoidance of general anaesthesia and surgery risks, therefore, can be considered for patients who are unsuitable for or refuse surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001289/pdfft?md5=cc01f88995e6ee34340069418bb5cf09&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001289-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001289\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的根治手术是治疗早期直肠癌的标准方法。然而,其他保留器官的方法也很有吸引力,尤其是对体弱或老年患者,因为这些方法可以避免手术并发症。我们评估了单独接触式 X 射线近距离放射治疗(CXB)对不适合或拒绝手术的 1 期直肠癌患者的疗效。材料与方法这项回顾性多中心研究(2009-2021 年)评估了 76 例 T1/2-N0-M0 直肠腺癌患者,这些患者均接受了单独的 CXB 治疗。研究评估了整个组群以及根据T分期和接受单纯CXB治疗的标准划分的亚组的疗效:A组:适合手术但拒绝手术的患者,B组:手术风险高的患者,C组:曾因其他癌症接受过盆腔放疗的患者。结果中位随访26个月(IQR:12-49),初始临床完全反应率(cCR)为82(70-93)%,局部再生率为18(8-29)%,3年精算局部控制率(LC)为84(75-95)%,远处复发率为3%,无结节复发。5年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为66(48-78)%和58(44-75)%。B组[HR:2.54(95 %CI:1.17,5.59),P = 0.02]和C组[HR:2.75(95 %CI:1.15,6.58),P = 0.03]的OS较低。曾接受盆腔放射治疗的患者 cCR 和 OS 较低。主要毒性是 G1-2 直肠出血(26%),没有任何患者出现肛门括约肌功能受损的症状。曾接受盆腔放疗的患者的肿瘤治疗效果较差。因此,对于不适合或拒绝手术的患者,可以考虑单用 CXB,因为它具有良好的毒性,而且避免了全身麻醉和手术风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contact X-ray Brachytherapy as a sole treatment in selected patients with early rectal cancer – Multi-centre study

Background and purpose

Radical surgery is the standard of care for early rectal cancer. However, alternative organ-preserving approaches are attractive, especially in frail or elderly patients as these avoid surgical complications. We have assessed the efficacy of sole Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) treatment in stage-1 rectal cancer patients who were unsuitable for or declined surgery.

Materials and methods

This retrospective multi-centre study (2009–2021) evaluated 76 patients with T1/2-N0-M0 rectal adenocarcinomas who were treated with CXB alone. Outcomes were assessed for the entire cohort and sub-groups based on the T-stage and the criteria for receiving CXB alone; Group A: patients who were fit enough for surgery but declined, Group B: patients who were high-risk for surgery and Group C: patients who had received prior pelvic radiation for a different cancer.

Results

With a median follow-up of 26(IQR:12–49) months, initial clinical Complete Response (cCR) was 82(70–93)% with rates of local regrowth 18(8–29)%, 3-year actuarial local control (LC) 84(75–95)%, distant relapse 3 %, and no nodal relapse. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66(48–78)% and 58(44–75)%. Lower OS was observed in Groups B [HR:2.54(95 %CI:1.17, 5.59), p = 0.02] and C [HR:2.75(95 %CI:1.15, 6.58), p = 0.03]. Previous pelvic radiation predicted lower cCR and OS. The main toxicity was G1-2 rectal bleeding (26 %) and symptoms of impaired anal sphincter function were not reported in any patients.

Conclusion

CXB treatment alone achieved a high cCR rate with satisfactory LC and DFS. Inferior oncological outcomes were observed in patients who had received prior pelvic radiotherapy. CXB alone, with its favourable toxicity profile and avoidance of general anaesthesia and surgery risks, therefore, can be considered for patients who are unsuitable for or refuse surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信