从社区老年人的角度理解虚弱及其对立面:现象学定性研究

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"从社区老年人的角度理解虚弱及其对立面:现象学定性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>the global population is ageing. As older people become more susceptible to frailty, an increase in frailty prevalence is also expected. Although frailty has been defined before in research, older peoples’ perceptions of frailty do not always coincide with those used in research or medical settings. Further exploring community-dwelling older people's viewpoints regarding frailty is essential for tailored care and policy.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>the aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of Dutch community-dwelling older people regarding frailty and its opposing concepts.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>a phenomenological qualitative study was conducted for which we carried out semi-structured interviews with independently living older people aged ≥65. Following the interviews, the participants filled out the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>the different domains of frailty: ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, and ‘social’, were recognized by participants. In addition, other aspects, such as financial capacity and digital functioning, have been identified. Four aspects of the meaning of frailty were identified in the category of other frailty definitions: ‘dependency’, ‘frailty as getting hurt’, ‘frailty as prone to deterioration’, and ‘frailty as experiences of loss and sacrifice’. Participants also described the opposites of frailty, which could also be distinguished according to the ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, and ‘social’ domains. In addition, participants mentioned the following concepts as opposing frailty: ‘vitality’, ‘resilience’, ‘independence’, ‘autonomy’, and ‘ambition’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>we found that frailty and its opposites share similar aspects, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Additionally, older people perceived cognition as an essential aspect of frailty. The psychological dimension seemed more dominant in concepts opposed to frailty, which raises opportunities to focus on the positive aspects and build on older people's (psychological) capabilities in managing frailty and its consequences. Based on these findings, policymakers and care professionals should consider the perspectives of older people regarding frailty and its opposing concepts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000651/pdfft?md5=4ca8c4072a808f90efdde1f131df01bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000651-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding frailty and its opposites from community-dwelling older peoples’ perspectives: A phenomenological qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>the global population is ageing. As older people become more susceptible to frailty, an increase in frailty prevalence is also expected. Although frailty has been defined before in research, older peoples’ perceptions of frailty do not always coincide with those used in research or medical settings. Further exploring community-dwelling older people's viewpoints regarding frailty is essential for tailored care and policy.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>the aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of Dutch community-dwelling older people regarding frailty and its opposing concepts.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>a phenomenological qualitative study was conducted for which we carried out semi-structured interviews with independently living older people aged ≥65. Following the interviews, the participants filled out the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>the different domains of frailty: ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, and ‘social’, were recognized by participants. In addition, other aspects, such as financial capacity and digital functioning, have been identified. Four aspects of the meaning of frailty were identified in the category of other frailty definitions: ‘dependency’, ‘frailty as getting hurt’, ‘frailty as prone to deterioration’, and ‘frailty as experiences of loss and sacrifice’. Participants also described the opposites of frailty, which could also be distinguished according to the ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, and ‘social’ domains. In addition, participants mentioned the following concepts as opposing frailty: ‘vitality’, ‘resilience’, ‘independence’, ‘autonomy’, and ‘ambition’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>we found that frailty and its opposites share similar aspects, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Additionally, older people perceived cognition as an essential aspect of frailty. The psychological dimension seemed more dominant in concepts opposed to frailty, which raises opportunities to focus on the positive aspects and build on older people's (psychological) capabilities in managing frailty and its consequences. Based on these findings, policymakers and care professionals should consider the perspectives of older people regarding frailty and its opposing concepts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000651/pdfft?md5=4ca8c4072a808f90efdde1f131df01bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000651-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景全球人口正在老龄化。随着老年人越来越容易体弱,预计体弱的发生率也会增加。虽然研究中已经对虚弱进行了定义,但老年人对虚弱的看法并不总是与研究或医疗环境中使用的看法一致。本研究旨在探讨荷兰社区老年人对虚弱及其对立概念的看法。研究方法我们对年龄≥65 岁、独立生活的老年人进行了半结构化访谈,开展了一项现象学定性研究。结果参与者认识到虚弱的不同领域:"身体"、"心理 "和 "社会"。此外,经济能力和数字功能等其他方面也得到了确认。在其他虚弱定义类别中,确定了虚弱含义的四个方面:依赖性"、"虚弱是受伤"、"虚弱是容易恶化 "以及 "虚弱是失去和牺牲的经历"。与会者还描述了虚弱的对立面,这些对立面也可以按照 "生理"、"心理 "和 "社会 "领域加以区分。此外,参与者还提到了以下与虚弱相对的概念:"活力"、"韧性"、"独立"、"自主 "和 "雄心"。此外,老年人认为认知是体弱的一个重要方面。在与体弱相对的概念中,心理层面似乎更占主导地位,这就为我们提供了关注积极方面的机会,并利用老年人的(心理)能力来管理体弱及其后果。基于这些发现,决策者和护理专业人员应考虑老年人对虚弱及其对立概念的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding frailty and its opposites from community-dwelling older peoples’ perspectives: A phenomenological qualitative study

Background

the global population is ageing. As older people become more susceptible to frailty, an increase in frailty prevalence is also expected. Although frailty has been defined before in research, older peoples’ perceptions of frailty do not always coincide with those used in research or medical settings. Further exploring community-dwelling older people's viewpoints regarding frailty is essential for tailored care and policy.

Aim

the aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of Dutch community-dwelling older people regarding frailty and its opposing concepts.

Methods

a phenomenological qualitative study was conducted for which we carried out semi-structured interviews with independently living older people aged ≥65. Following the interviews, the participants filled out the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.

Results

the different domains of frailty: ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, and ‘social’, were recognized by participants. In addition, other aspects, such as financial capacity and digital functioning, have been identified. Four aspects of the meaning of frailty were identified in the category of other frailty definitions: ‘dependency’, ‘frailty as getting hurt’, ‘frailty as prone to deterioration’, and ‘frailty as experiences of loss and sacrifice’. Participants also described the opposites of frailty, which could also be distinguished according to the ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, and ‘social’ domains. In addition, participants mentioned the following concepts as opposing frailty: ‘vitality’, ‘resilience’, ‘independence’, ‘autonomy’, and ‘ambition’.

Conclusion

we found that frailty and its opposites share similar aspects, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Additionally, older people perceived cognition as an essential aspect of frailty. The psychological dimension seemed more dominant in concepts opposed to frailty, which raises opportunities to focus on the positive aspects and build on older people's (psychological) capabilities in managing frailty and its consequences. Based on these findings, policymakers and care professionals should consider the perspectives of older people regarding frailty and its opposing concepts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信