通过开发和应用轨道强度指数 (TSI) 量化轨道屈曲强度的数据驱动方法

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
{"title":"通过开发和应用轨道强度指数 (TSI) 量化轨道屈曲强度的数据驱动方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Railroads are increasingly adopting advanced technologies to enhance safety and state of good repair of their track infrastructure, some of which employ artificial intelligence-based inspection methods. The objectivity of these inspection techniques, along with their detailed measuring capabilities, has created opportunities for railroads to improve both inspection and operational efficiency. This is achieved through more frequent and precise track data collections and technical data aggregations. This paper explores the potential of these track inspection methods to address one of the few drawbacks of continuous welded rail (CWR): track buckling. While track buckling mechanics and prevention have been the subject of numerous studies, the need for a practical and objective method to assess resistance to buckling remains. Numerous track health indices for geometry parameters and some for railway components have been developed and utilized in various applications. Yet, the opportunity exists to develop a metric that combines geometric parameters with the condition levels of railway components, particularly designed to quantify the resistance of track to buckling. Such a holistic view of the track and network-wide time series analyses of the proposed metric demonstrate whether the buckling resistance improves, remains in a steady state, or declines. In this study, a sensitivity analysis conducted using CWR-Risk software identified misalignment amplitude, track curvature, lateral resistance, torsional resistance, and longitudinal resistance as the main factors contributing to buckling resistance. Based on the sensitivity study and with a focus on the capacity side of the track buckling equation, a methodology was proposed for converting inspection data into 10-point scales that were combined through weighted averaging into a single Track Strength Index (TSI) to quantitatively assess the resistance to buckling at a track-system level. The influence of ballast condition on TSI output was evaluated using 15 ballast configuration scenarios, ensuring that the index accurately reflects ballast deficiencies in a proportionate manner. Lastly, the proposed metric was tested leveraging revenue service data collected from a Class I railroad mainline in the United States.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224001806/pdfft?md5=31f13c7b808e0f1517f15d4098cc9f71&pid=1-s2.0-S2214391224001806-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A data-driven approach to quantify track buckling strength through the development and application of a Track Strength Index (TSI)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Railroads are increasingly adopting advanced technologies to enhance safety and state of good repair of their track infrastructure, some of which employ artificial intelligence-based inspection methods. The objectivity of these inspection techniques, along with their detailed measuring capabilities, has created opportunities for railroads to improve both inspection and operational efficiency. This is achieved through more frequent and precise track data collections and technical data aggregations. This paper explores the potential of these track inspection methods to address one of the few drawbacks of continuous welded rail (CWR): track buckling. While track buckling mechanics and prevention have been the subject of numerous studies, the need for a practical and objective method to assess resistance to buckling remains. Numerous track health indices for geometry parameters and some for railway components have been developed and utilized in various applications. Yet, the opportunity exists to develop a metric that combines geometric parameters with the condition levels of railway components, particularly designed to quantify the resistance of track to buckling. Such a holistic view of the track and network-wide time series analyses of the proposed metric demonstrate whether the buckling resistance improves, remains in a steady state, or declines. In this study, a sensitivity analysis conducted using CWR-Risk software identified misalignment amplitude, track curvature, lateral resistance, torsional resistance, and longitudinal resistance as the main factors contributing to buckling resistance. Based on the sensitivity study and with a focus on the capacity side of the track buckling equation, a methodology was proposed for converting inspection data into 10-point scales that were combined through weighted averaging into a single Track Strength Index (TSI) to quantitatively assess the resistance to buckling at a track-system level. The influence of ballast condition on TSI output was evaluated using 15 ballast configuration scenarios, ensuring that the index accurately reflects ballast deficiencies in a proportionate manner. Lastly, the proposed metric was tested leveraging revenue service data collected from a Class I railroad mainline in the United States.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224001806/pdfft?md5=31f13c7b808e0f1517f15d4098cc9f71&pid=1-s2.0-S2214391224001806-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224001806\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224001806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铁路公司正越来越多地采用先进技术来加强轨道基础设施的安全和完好状态,其中一些技术采用了基于人工智能的检测方法。这些检测技术的客观性及其详细的测量能力为铁路公司提高检测和运营效率创造了机会。这可以通过更频繁、更精确的轨道数据收集和技术数据汇总来实现。本文探讨了这些轨道检测方法在解决连续焊接钢轨(CWR)为数不多的缺点之一--轨道弯曲--方面的潜力。虽然轨道屈曲力学和预防已成为众多研究的主题,但仍然需要一种实用、客观的方法来评估轨道屈曲阻力。针对几何参数和一些铁路部件已开发出大量轨道健康指数,并用于各种应用中。然而,我们仍有机会开发出一种将几何参数与铁路部件状况水平相结合的指标,特别是用于量化轨道的抗屈曲能力。通过对轨道的整体观察和对所建议指标的全网时间序列分析,可以证明轨道的抗弯曲性能是在提高、保持稳定状态还是在下降。在本研究中,使用 CWR-Risk 软件进行的灵敏度分析确定了错位振幅、轨道曲率、横向阻力、扭转阻力和纵向阻力是导致屈曲阻力的主要因素。在敏感性研究的基础上,以轨道屈曲等式中的能力侧为重点,提出了一种将检测数据转换为 10 点刻度的方法,通过加权平均将其合并为单一的轨道强度指数 (TSI),以定量评估轨道系统层面的抗屈曲能力。使用 15 种无砟轨道配置方案评估了无砟轨道状况对 TSI 输出的影响,确保该指数能按比例准确反映无砟轨道的缺陷。最后,利用从美国一级铁路干线收集的收入服务数据,对所提出的指标进行了测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A data-driven approach to quantify track buckling strength through the development and application of a Track Strength Index (TSI)

Railroads are increasingly adopting advanced technologies to enhance safety and state of good repair of their track infrastructure, some of which employ artificial intelligence-based inspection methods. The objectivity of these inspection techniques, along with their detailed measuring capabilities, has created opportunities for railroads to improve both inspection and operational efficiency. This is achieved through more frequent and precise track data collections and technical data aggregations. This paper explores the potential of these track inspection methods to address one of the few drawbacks of continuous welded rail (CWR): track buckling. While track buckling mechanics and prevention have been the subject of numerous studies, the need for a practical and objective method to assess resistance to buckling remains. Numerous track health indices for geometry parameters and some for railway components have been developed and utilized in various applications. Yet, the opportunity exists to develop a metric that combines geometric parameters with the condition levels of railway components, particularly designed to quantify the resistance of track to buckling. Such a holistic view of the track and network-wide time series analyses of the proposed metric demonstrate whether the buckling resistance improves, remains in a steady state, or declines. In this study, a sensitivity analysis conducted using CWR-Risk software identified misalignment amplitude, track curvature, lateral resistance, torsional resistance, and longitudinal resistance as the main factors contributing to buckling resistance. Based on the sensitivity study and with a focus on the capacity side of the track buckling equation, a methodology was proposed for converting inspection data into 10-point scales that were combined through weighted averaging into a single Track Strength Index (TSI) to quantitatively assess the resistance to buckling at a track-system level. The influence of ballast condition on TSI output was evaluated using 15 ballast configuration scenarios, ensuring that the index accurately reflects ballast deficiencies in a proportionate manner. Lastly, the proposed metric was tested leveraging revenue service data collected from a Class I railroad mainline in the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信