{"title":"\"安全供应：\"这个词也会引起争议，但仍然没有定义","authors":"Alison Knopf","doi":"10.1002/adaw.34237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>ADAW</i> attempted to get a nice definition of “safe supply” last month; typically a quiet news time, August is perfect for delving into such projects. Safe supply has apparently been rejected as a phrase because even the harm reduction community recognizes that opioids are not “safe,” but that drugs which do not contain illicit fentanyl, for example, are “safer” than those that do. The entire question arises as a response to the opioid overdose epidemic which shows little sign of abating in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":100073,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly","volume":"36 34","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Safe supply:” Even the phrase stirs up controversy, still no definition\",\"authors\":\"Alison Knopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/adaw.34237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>ADAW</i> attempted to get a nice definition of “safe supply” last month; typically a quiet news time, August is perfect for delving into such projects. Safe supply has apparently been rejected as a phrase because even the harm reduction community recognizes that opioids are not “safe,” but that drugs which do not contain illicit fentanyl, for example, are “safer” than those that do. The entire question arises as a response to the opioid overdose epidemic which shows little sign of abating in the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly\",\"volume\":\"36 34\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adaw.34237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adaw.34237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Safe supply:” Even the phrase stirs up controversy, still no definition
ADAW attempted to get a nice definition of “safe supply” last month; typically a quiet news time, August is perfect for delving into such projects. Safe supply has apparently been rejected as a phrase because even the harm reduction community recognizes that opioids are not “safe,” but that drugs which do not contain illicit fentanyl, for example, are “safer” than those that do. The entire question arises as a response to the opioid overdose epidemic which shows little sign of abating in the United States.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
