病人体重对院外心脏骤停后自主循环恢复概率的影响:探索性分析。

Michael W Hubble, Ginny R Kaplan, Melisa Martin
{"title":"病人体重对院外心脏骤停后自主循环恢复概率的影响:探索性分析。","authors":"Michael W Hubble, Ginny R Kaplan, Melisa Martin","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In addition to key interventions, including bystander CPR and defibrillation, successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is also associated with several patient-level factors, including a shockable presenting rhythm, younger age, Caucasian race and female sex. An additional patient-level factor that may influence outcomes is patient weight, yet this attribute has not been extensively studied within the context of OHCA, despite globally increasing obesity rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between patient weight and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included adult patients from a national emergency medical services (EMS) patient record, with witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival from January to December 2020. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient weight and ROSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete records were available for 9096 patients, of which 64.3% were males and 25.3% were ethnic minorities. The mean age of the participants was 65.01 years (SD = 15.8), with a mean weight of 93.52 kg (SD = 31.5). Altogether, 81.8% of arrests were of presumed cardiac aetiology and 30.3% presented with a shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) shock were performed in 30.6% and 7.3% of cases, respectively, and 44.0% experienced ROSC. ROSC was less likely with patient weight >100 kg (OR = 0.709, p <0.001), male sex (OR = 0.782, p <0.001), and increasing age and EMS response time (OR = 0.994 per year, p <0.001 and OR = 0.970 per minute, p <0.001, respectively). Patients with shockable rhythms were more likely to achieve ROSC (OR = 1.790, p <0.001), as were patients receiving bystander CPR (OR = 1.170, p <0.001) and defibrillation prior to EMS arrival (OR = 1.658, p <0.001). Although the mean first adrenaline dose (mg/kg) followed a downward trend due to its non-weight-based dosing scheme, the mean total adrenaline dose administered to achieve ROSC demonstrated an upward linear trend of 0.05 mg for every 5 kg of body weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient weight was negatively associated with ROSC and positively associated with the total adrenaline dose required to attain ROSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of patient body weight on the probability of return of spontaneous circulation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michael W Hubble, Ginny R Kaplan, Melisa Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In addition to key interventions, including bystander CPR and defibrillation, successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is also associated with several patient-level factors, including a shockable presenting rhythm, younger age, Caucasian race and female sex. An additional patient-level factor that may influence outcomes is patient weight, yet this attribute has not been extensively studied within the context of OHCA, despite globally increasing obesity rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between patient weight and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included adult patients from a national emergency medical services (EMS) patient record, with witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival from January to December 2020. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient weight and ROSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete records were available for 9096 patients, of which 64.3% were males and 25.3% were ethnic minorities. The mean age of the participants was 65.01 years (SD = 15.8), with a mean weight of 93.52 kg (SD = 31.5). Altogether, 81.8% of arrests were of presumed cardiac aetiology and 30.3% presented with a shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) shock were performed in 30.6% and 7.3% of cases, respectively, and 44.0% experienced ROSC. ROSC was less likely with patient weight >100 kg (OR = 0.709, p <0.001), male sex (OR = 0.782, p <0.001), and increasing age and EMS response time (OR = 0.994 per year, p <0.001 and OR = 0.970 per minute, p <0.001, respectively). Patients with shockable rhythms were more likely to achieve ROSC (OR = 1.790, p <0.001), as were patients receiving bystander CPR (OR = 1.170, p <0.001) and defibrillation prior to EMS arrival (OR = 1.658, p <0.001). Although the mean first adrenaline dose (mg/kg) followed a downward trend due to its non-weight-based dosing scheme, the mean total adrenaline dose administered to achieve ROSC demonstrated an upward linear trend of 0.05 mg for every 5 kg of body weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient weight was negatively associated with ROSC and positively associated with the total adrenaline dose required to attain ROSC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376325/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:除了包括旁观者心肺复苏术和除颤在内的关键干预措施外,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的成功复苏还与几个患者层面的因素有关,包括可电击心律、年龄较小、白种人和女性。另外一个可能影响抢救结果的患者层面因素是患者体重,尽管肥胖率在全球范围内不断上升,但在 OHCA 的背景下,这一因素尚未得到广泛研究:评估患者体重与 OHCA 期间自发性循环恢复(ROSC)之间的关系:这项回顾性研究纳入了全国急救医疗服务(EMS)患者记录中的成年患者,这些患者在 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间,在急救医疗服务到达之前发生了有目击者在场的非创伤性 OHCA。研究采用逻辑回归法评估患者体重与 ROSC 之间的关系:共有 9096 名患者的完整记录,其中 64.3% 为男性,25.3% 为少数民族。参与者的平均年龄为 65.01 岁(SD = 15.8),平均体重为 93.52 千克(SD = 31.5)。81.8%的心跳骤停推测为心脏原因,30.3%的心跳骤停表现为可电击心律。旁观者心肺复苏和自动体外除颤器(AED)电击的比例分别为 30.6% 和 7.3%,44.0% 的患者获得了 ROSC。体重大于 100 千克的患者出现 ROSC 的几率较低(OR = 0.709,P 结论:体重大于 100 千克的患者出现 ROSC 的几率较低):患者体重与 ROSC 呈负相关,与达到 ROSC 所需的肾上腺素总剂量呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of patient body weight on the probability of return of spontaneous circulation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory analysis.

Introduction: In addition to key interventions, including bystander CPR and defibrillation, successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is also associated with several patient-level factors, including a shockable presenting rhythm, younger age, Caucasian race and female sex. An additional patient-level factor that may influence outcomes is patient weight, yet this attribute has not been extensively studied within the context of OHCA, despite globally increasing obesity rates.

Objective: To assess the relationship between patient weight and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during OHCA.

Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients from a national emergency medical services (EMS) patient record, with witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival from January to December 2020. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient weight and ROSC.

Results: Complete records were available for 9096 patients, of which 64.3% were males and 25.3% were ethnic minorities. The mean age of the participants was 65.01 years (SD = 15.8), with a mean weight of 93.52 kg (SD = 31.5). Altogether, 81.8% of arrests were of presumed cardiac aetiology and 30.3% presented with a shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) shock were performed in 30.6% and 7.3% of cases, respectively, and 44.0% experienced ROSC. ROSC was less likely with patient weight >100 kg (OR = 0.709, p <0.001), male sex (OR = 0.782, p <0.001), and increasing age and EMS response time (OR = 0.994 per year, p <0.001 and OR = 0.970 per minute, p <0.001, respectively). Patients with shockable rhythms were more likely to achieve ROSC (OR = 1.790, p <0.001), as were patients receiving bystander CPR (OR = 1.170, p <0.001) and defibrillation prior to EMS arrival (OR = 1.658, p <0.001). Although the mean first adrenaline dose (mg/kg) followed a downward trend due to its non-weight-based dosing scheme, the mean total adrenaline dose administered to achieve ROSC demonstrated an upward linear trend of 0.05 mg for every 5 kg of body weight.

Conclusions: Patient weight was negatively associated with ROSC and positively associated with the total adrenaline dose required to attain ROSC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信