奔跑、躲藏、战斗 "理念对改善医院应对枪击事件有效吗?系统回顾。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Natcha Rummaneethorn, Cara Taubman, Frosso Adamakos
{"title":"奔跑、躲藏、战斗 \"理念对改善医院应对枪击事件有效吗?系统回顾。","authors":"Natcha Rummaneethorn, Cara Taubman, Frosso Adamakos","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2024.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent rise of active shootings calls for adequate preparation. Currently, the \"Run, Hide, Fight\" concept is widely accepted and adopted by many hospitals nationwide. Unfortunately, the appropriateness of this concept in hospitals is uncertain due to lack of data. To understand the \"Run, Hide, Fight\" concept application in hospitals, a review of currently available data is needed. A systematic review was done focusing on the \"Run, Hide, Fight\" concept using multiple databases from the past 12 years. The PRISMA flow diagram was used to systematically select the articles based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The measurements were subjective evaluations and survival probabilities post-concept. One agent-based modeling study suggested a high survival probability in non-medical settings. However, there is a paucity of data supporting its effectiveness and applicability in hospitals. Literature suggests a better suitable concept, the \"Secure, Preserve, Fight\" concept, as a response protocol to active shootings in hospitals. The effectiveness of the \"Run, Hide, Fight\" concept in hospitals is questionable. The \"Secure, Preserve, Fight\" concept was found to be designed more specifically for hospitals and closes the gaps on the flaws in the \"Run, Hide, Fight\" concept.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Run, Hide, Fight Concept Effective in Improving Hospital Response to Shooting Incidents? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Natcha Rummaneethorn, Cara Taubman, Frosso Adamakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/dmp.2024.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent rise of active shootings calls for adequate preparation. Currently, the \\\"Run, Hide, Fight\\\" concept is widely accepted and adopted by many hospitals nationwide. Unfortunately, the appropriateness of this concept in hospitals is uncertain due to lack of data. To understand the \\\"Run, Hide, Fight\\\" concept application in hospitals, a review of currently available data is needed. A systematic review was done focusing on the \\\"Run, Hide, Fight\\\" concept using multiple databases from the past 12 years. The PRISMA flow diagram was used to systematically select the articles based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The measurements were subjective evaluations and survival probabilities post-concept. One agent-based modeling study suggested a high survival probability in non-medical settings. However, there is a paucity of data supporting its effectiveness and applicability in hospitals. Literature suggests a better suitable concept, the \\\"Secure, Preserve, Fight\\\" concept, as a response protocol to active shootings in hospitals. The effectiveness of the \\\"Run, Hide, Fight\\\" concept in hospitals is questionable. The \\\"Secure, Preserve, Fight\\\" concept was found to be designed more specifically for hospitals and closes the gaps on the flaws in the \\\"Run, Hide, Fight\\\" concept.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.78\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.78","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,主动枪击事件增多,这要求我们做好充分准备。目前,"逃跑、躲藏、战斗 "的理念被全国许多医院广泛接受和采用。遗憾的是,由于缺乏数据,这一理念在医院的适用性尚不确定。为了了解 "跑、躲、打 "理念在医院中的应用,需要对现有数据进行回顾。我们利用过去 12 年中的多个数据库对 "跑、藏、打 "概念进行了系统回顾。根据特定的纳入和排除标准,采用 PRISMA 流程图对文章进行了系统筛选。衡量标准是主观评价和概念提出后的生存概率。一项基于代理的建模研究表明,在非医疗环境中的存活概率很高。然而,支持其在医院中的有效性和适用性的数据却很少。文献建议采用更合适的概念,即 "安全、保护、战斗 "概念,作为应对医院主动枪击事件的方案。逃跑、躲藏、战斗 "概念在医院中的有效性值得怀疑。研究发现,"安全、保护、战斗 "概念是专为医院设计的,弥补了 "逃跑、躲藏、战斗 "概念的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Run, Hide, Fight Concept Effective in Improving Hospital Response to Shooting Incidents? A Systematic Review.

The recent rise of active shootings calls for adequate preparation. Currently, the "Run, Hide, Fight" concept is widely accepted and adopted by many hospitals nationwide. Unfortunately, the appropriateness of this concept in hospitals is uncertain due to lack of data. To understand the "Run, Hide, Fight" concept application in hospitals, a review of currently available data is needed. A systematic review was done focusing on the "Run, Hide, Fight" concept using multiple databases from the past 12 years. The PRISMA flow diagram was used to systematically select the articles based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The measurements were subjective evaluations and survival probabilities post-concept. One agent-based modeling study suggested a high survival probability in non-medical settings. However, there is a paucity of data supporting its effectiveness and applicability in hospitals. Literature suggests a better suitable concept, the "Secure, Preserve, Fight" concept, as a response protocol to active shootings in hospitals. The effectiveness of the "Run, Hide, Fight" concept in hospitals is questionable. The "Secure, Preserve, Fight" concept was found to be designed more specifically for hospitals and closes the gaps on the flaws in the "Run, Hide, Fight" concept.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信