有关神经调节治疗儿童运动障碍的患者教育材料的内容和可读性。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jamie M Barnacoat, Jennifer Lewis, Kirsty Stewart, Shekeeb S Mohammad, Simon Paget
{"title":"有关神经调节治疗儿童运动障碍的患者教育材料的内容和可读性。","authors":"Jamie M Barnacoat, Jennifer Lewis, Kirsty Stewart, Shekeeb S Mohammad, Simon Paget","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2397078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess content and readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) for paediatric deep brain stimulation (DBS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content analysis of PEMs identified from top children's hospitals, institutions affiliated with published neuromodulation research, and DBS and ITB device manufacturers was conducted. PEM content was analysed using a predetermined framework. Readability was assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 109 PEMs (72 DBS; 37 ITB) identified, most (77 (71%)) originated in the United States. More ITB PEMs (27 (73%)) contained specific paediatric information than DBS PEMs (16 (22%)). PEMS more frequently described benefits (DBS: 92%; ITB: 89%) than risks (DBS: 49%; ITB: 78%). Frequent content included pre- and post-operative care, procedural details, and device information. Less common content included long-term lifestyle considerations, alternatives, patient experiences, and financial details. Median readability of PEMs was 13.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.4-14.45) for DBS and 11.8 (IQR: 11-12.9) for ITB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available ITB and DBS PEMs often miss important broader details of the treatments, and have additional shortcomings such as poor readability scores. Our findings highlight need for more holistic content within neuromodulation PEMs, improved accessibility, and more balanced representation of risks and benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content and readability of patient educational materials about neuromodulation for childhood movement disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie M Barnacoat, Jennifer Lewis, Kirsty Stewart, Shekeeb S Mohammad, Simon Paget\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2397078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess content and readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) for paediatric deep brain stimulation (DBS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content analysis of PEMs identified from top children's hospitals, institutions affiliated with published neuromodulation research, and DBS and ITB device manufacturers was conducted. PEM content was analysed using a predetermined framework. Readability was assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 109 PEMs (72 DBS; 37 ITB) identified, most (77 (71%)) originated in the United States. More ITB PEMs (27 (73%)) contained specific paediatric information than DBS PEMs (16 (22%)). PEMS more frequently described benefits (DBS: 92%; ITB: 89%) than risks (DBS: 49%; ITB: 78%). Frequent content included pre- and post-operative care, procedural details, and device information. Less common content included long-term lifestyle considerations, alternatives, patient experiences, and financial details. Median readability of PEMs was 13.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.4-14.45) for DBS and 11.8 (IQR: 11-12.9) for ITB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available ITB and DBS PEMs often miss important broader details of the treatments, and have additional shortcomings such as poor readability scores. Our findings highlight need for more holistic content within neuromodulation PEMs, improved accessibility, and more balanced representation of risks and benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2397078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2397078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估儿科脑深部刺激(DBS)和鞘内巴氯芬(ITB)在线患者教育资料(PEMs)的内容和可读性:对从顶级儿童医院、已发表神经调控研究的附属机构以及 DBS 和 ITB 设备制造商处获得的 PEM 进行了内容分析。使用预先确定的框架对 PEM 内容进行分析。可读性采用 "简单粗话测量法"(SMOG)进行评估:在已确认的 109 个 PEM(72 个 DBS;37 个 ITB)中,大多数(77 个(71%))源自美国。包含特定儿科信息的 ITB PEMs(27 份(73%))多于 DBS PEMs(16 份(22%))。与风险(DBS:49%;ITB:78%)相比,PEMS 更经常描述益处(DBS:92%;ITB:89%)。常见的内容包括术前和术后护理、程序细节和设备信息。较少见的内容包括长期生活方式注意事项、替代方案、患者经验和财务细节。DBS 和 ITB PEM 的可读性中位数分别为 13.2(四分位数间距 [IQR]:11.4-14.45)和 11.8(IQR:11-12.9):结论:现有的 ITB 和 DBS PEM 常常遗漏治疗的重要细节,并存在可读性差等缺点。我们的研究结果表明,神经调控 PEM 需要更全面的内容、更好的可读性以及更平衡的风险和益处表述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content and readability of patient educational materials about neuromodulation for childhood movement disorders.

Purpose: To assess content and readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) for paediatric deep brain stimulation (DBS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB).

Methods: A content analysis of PEMs identified from top children's hospitals, institutions affiliated with published neuromodulation research, and DBS and ITB device manufacturers was conducted. PEM content was analysed using a predetermined framework. Readability was assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).

Results: Of 109 PEMs (72 DBS; 37 ITB) identified, most (77 (71%)) originated in the United States. More ITB PEMs (27 (73%)) contained specific paediatric information than DBS PEMs (16 (22%)). PEMS more frequently described benefits (DBS: 92%; ITB: 89%) than risks (DBS: 49%; ITB: 78%). Frequent content included pre- and post-operative care, procedural details, and device information. Less common content included long-term lifestyle considerations, alternatives, patient experiences, and financial details. Median readability of PEMs was 13.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.4-14.45) for DBS and 11.8 (IQR: 11-12.9) for ITB.

Conclusions: Available ITB and DBS PEMs often miss important broader details of the treatments, and have additional shortcomings such as poor readability scores. Our findings highlight need for more holistic content within neuromodulation PEMs, improved accessibility, and more balanced representation of risks and benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信