比较人类与非人灵长类动物的颅缝交接:发掘与骨科头颅概念的联系。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Janice Blumer, Irisa Arney, Anna Hardin, Morgan Nichols, Luke Arsenault, John Petrucci
{"title":"比较人类与非人灵长类动物的颅缝交接:发掘与骨科头颅概念的联系。","authors":"Janice Blumer, Irisa Arney, Anna Hardin, Morgan Nichols, Luke Arsenault, John Petrucci","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Since William Garner Sutherland's inception of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine (OCMM), osteopathic physicians have practiced with the knowledge that cranial sutures exhibit motion. We hypothesize that the complexity of suture interdigitation in humans may provide clues to elucidate the concept of OCMM.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the interdigitation of sagittal, coronal (left and right), and lambdoid (left and right) sutures in computed tomography (CT) scans of humans and five nonhuman primate species (<i>Gorilla gorilla</i>, <i>Pongo pygmaeus</i>, <i>Pan troglodytes</i>, <i>Hylobates lar</i>, and <i>Nasalis larvatus</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human ages are evenly distributed between 10 and 65 years of age, with an equal number of males (n=16) and females (n=16) in the sample. Nonhuman primates are all females, and the sample includes juveniles (n=6) and adults (n=34). Sutures were evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0: fused sutures; 1: no interdigitation; 2: low complexity; and 3: representing the highest degree of interdigitation and complexity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on ordinary least squares linear regression, we found no significant relationship between suture interdigitation and age in humans. Chi-square tests were utilized to assess sex differences within humans, species-level differences, and differences between humans and nonhuman primates across all five sutures. Humans exhibited a statistically significant greater degree of suture complexity than all five nonhuman species across all five sutures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that human suture interdigitation is more complex than their closest living relatives (African apes) and other primates (Asian monkeys and apes). We theorize that this would enable subtle movement and serve to transmit forces at the cranial sutures from dietary or ethological behaviors, similar to the pattern observed in other mammals. While humans have a softer diet compared to other living primates, the uniqueness of human craniofacial growth and extended developmental period could contribute to the necessity for complex cranial sutures. More studies are needed to understand variation in human and nonhuman sutural complexity and its relationship to cranial motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept.\",\"authors\":\"Janice Blumer, Irisa Arney, Anna Hardin, Morgan Nichols, Luke Arsenault, John Petrucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2023-0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Since William Garner Sutherland's inception of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine (OCMM), osteopathic physicians have practiced with the knowledge that cranial sutures exhibit motion. We hypothesize that the complexity of suture interdigitation in humans may provide clues to elucidate the concept of OCMM.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the interdigitation of sagittal, coronal (left and right), and lambdoid (left and right) sutures in computed tomography (CT) scans of humans and five nonhuman primate species (<i>Gorilla gorilla</i>, <i>Pongo pygmaeus</i>, <i>Pan troglodytes</i>, <i>Hylobates lar</i>, and <i>Nasalis larvatus</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human ages are evenly distributed between 10 and 65 years of age, with an equal number of males (n=16) and females (n=16) in the sample. Nonhuman primates are all females, and the sample includes juveniles (n=6) and adults (n=34). Sutures were evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0: fused sutures; 1: no interdigitation; 2: low complexity; and 3: representing the highest degree of interdigitation and complexity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on ordinary least squares linear regression, we found no significant relationship between suture interdigitation and age in humans. Chi-square tests were utilized to assess sex differences within humans, species-level differences, and differences between humans and nonhuman primates across all five sutures. Humans exhibited a statistically significant greater degree of suture complexity than all five nonhuman species across all five sutures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that human suture interdigitation is more complex than their closest living relatives (African apes) and other primates (Asian monkeys and apes). We theorize that this would enable subtle movement and serve to transmit forces at the cranial sutures from dietary or ethological behaviors, similar to the pattern observed in other mammals. While humans have a softer diet compared to other living primates, the uniqueness of human craniofacial growth and extended developmental period could contribute to the necessity for complex cranial sutures. More studies are needed to understand variation in human and nonhuman sutural complexity and its relationship to cranial motion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自威廉-加纳-萨瑟兰(William Garner Sutherland)提出颅骨整骨疗法(OCMM)以来,整骨疗法医生一直以颅骨缝线表现出运动的知识为基础行医。我们假设,人类缝线相互咬合的复杂性可能为阐明 OCMM 的概念提供线索:我们比较了人类和五种非人灵长类动物(大猩猩、庞戈侏儒、潘氏灵长类、Hylobates lar 和 Nasalis larvatus)的计算机断层扫描(CT)中矢状缝、冠状缝(左侧和右侧)和蝶状缝(左侧和右侧)的相互咬合情况。方法:人类的年龄均匀分布在 10 岁到 65 岁之间,样本中男性(n=16)和女性(n=16)的数量相等。非人灵长类动物均为雌性,样本中包括幼年(n=6)和成年(n=34)。缝合线的评估范围从 0 到 3(0:融合缝合线;1:无相互咬合;2:低复杂度;3:代表最高程度的相互咬合和复杂度):结果:根据普通最小二乘法线性回归,我们发现缝线相互咬合与人类年龄之间没有显著关系。我们利用卡方检验评估了人类内部的性别差异、物种间的差异以及人类与非人灵长类动物在所有五条缝上的差异。在所有五条缝线上,人类比所有五种非人类灵长类动物的缝线复杂程度都要高,这在统计学上具有显著意义:这些研究结果表明,人类的缝合相互结合比其近亲(非洲猿)和其他灵长类动物(亚洲猴和猿)更为复杂。我们推测,这将使人类能够进行微妙的运动,并在颅缝处传递来自饮食或伦理行为的力量,这与在其他哺乳动物身上观察到的模式类似。虽然与其他灵长类动物相比,人类的饮食较为松软,但人类颅面部生长的独特性和发育期的延长可能会导致复杂颅缝的必要性。要了解人类和非人类颅缝复杂性的变化及其与颅骨运动的关系,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept.

Context: Since William Garner Sutherland's inception of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine (OCMM), osteopathic physicians have practiced with the knowledge that cranial sutures exhibit motion. We hypothesize that the complexity of suture interdigitation in humans may provide clues to elucidate the concept of OCMM.

Objectives: We compared the interdigitation of sagittal, coronal (left and right), and lambdoid (left and right) sutures in computed tomography (CT) scans of humans and five nonhuman primate species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Hylobates lar, and Nasalis larvatus).

Methods: Human ages are evenly distributed between 10 and 65 years of age, with an equal number of males (n=16) and females (n=16) in the sample. Nonhuman primates are all females, and the sample includes juveniles (n=6) and adults (n=34). Sutures were evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0: fused sutures; 1: no interdigitation; 2: low complexity; and 3: representing the highest degree of interdigitation and complexity).

Results: Based on ordinary least squares linear regression, we found no significant relationship between suture interdigitation and age in humans. Chi-square tests were utilized to assess sex differences within humans, species-level differences, and differences between humans and nonhuman primates across all five sutures. Humans exhibited a statistically significant greater degree of suture complexity than all five nonhuman species across all five sutures.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that human suture interdigitation is more complex than their closest living relatives (African apes) and other primates (Asian monkeys and apes). We theorize that this would enable subtle movement and serve to transmit forces at the cranial sutures from dietary or ethological behaviors, similar to the pattern observed in other mammals. While humans have a softer diet compared to other living primates, the uniqueness of human craniofacial growth and extended developmental period could contribute to the necessity for complex cranial sutures. More studies are needed to understand variation in human and nonhuman sutural complexity and its relationship to cranial motion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信